N.J. Stat. » Title 2B — COURT ORGANIZATION AND CIVIL CODE

N.J. Stat. § 2B:8-1

Interpreters

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaN.J. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

2B:8-1. Interpreters. Each county shall provide interpreting services necessary for cases from that county in the Law Division and the Family Part of the Chancery Division. A county may provide interpreting services through the use of persons hired for that purpose. If interpreters are employed, they shall be appointed and shall perform their duties in the manner established by the Chief Justice, and shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing authority. For the purpose of determining their compensation, these employees shall be considered county employees.

As used in this section "interpreting services" shall include the provision of services to assist a developmentally disabled person, as that term is defined in section 3 of P.L.1977, c.82 (C.30:6D-3), and to assist a hearing impaired person to understand questions and to frame and express answers in a criminal proceeding; provided that the person is not otherwise disqualified as a witness.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2001–2020 · leading case: Ronald Chisolm v. Patrick McManimon Jr., Director of Mercer County Detention Center Mercer County Court, United States o
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ronald Chisolm v. Patrick McManimon Jr., Director of Mercer County Detention Center Mercer County Court, United States o (2001) ca3 “See N.J. Stat. § 2B:8-1 (2001). 5 . The case was captioned improperly as "Ronald Chisolm v.”
JOHN H. ECHEVERRY VS. RON BELLO (SC-000036-19, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (2019) njsuperctappdiv “" N.J.S.A. 2B:8-1. Standard 1.2 of the Language Access Plan requires interpreters "for all court proceedings, programs, services or court-ordered events that take place inside the courthouse .”
R.T. VS. T.N. (FV-09-2547-18, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) (2020) njsuperctappdiv “N.J.S.A. 2B:8-1 requires each county to "provide interpreting services necessary for cases from that county in the Law Division and the Family Part of the Chancery Division" and that such interpreters "shall (continued) A-2593-18T2 8 Finally, although we acknowledge defendant's…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.