New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 62-1-1 (2026)

[Incorporation.]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Corporations for the generation, production, transmission, distribution, sale or utilization of gas, electricity or steam for lighting, heating, power, manufacturing or other purposes may be organized under the general incorporation laws of this state.

History: Laws 1909, ch. 141, § 1; 1912, ch. 50, § 1; Code 1915, § 1021; C.S. 1929, § 32-401; 1941 Comp., § 72-101; 1953 Comp., § 68-1-1.

ANNOTATIONS

Compiler's notes. — Sections 62-1-1 to 62-1-7 of the Public Utility Act are still effective as the repeal of Chapter 62, Article 1 by Laws 1998, Chapter 108, Section 82, effective July 1, 2003 was repealed prior to taking effect by Chapter 23, Section 1, Laws 2003. Although Laws 2003, Chapter 336, Section 8, amended Laws 1998, Chapter 82, as amended, an amendment of a repealed section is ineffective. See Quintana v. N.M. Dep’t of Corrs., 100 N.M. 224, 668 P.2d 1101 (1983). Laws 2003, Chapter 416, Section 5 also repealed Laws 1998, Chapter 108, Section 82, as amended, a second time, however, that repeal is of no effect as the section had previously been repealed by Chapter 23, Section 1, Laws 2003.

Cross references. — For requirement of certificate of public convenience and necessity before new utility construction or operation, see 62-9-1 NMSA 1978.

For municipal utilities, see 3-23-1 to 3-23-10, 3-24-1 to 3-24-10, 3-25-1 to 3-25-6, 3-26-1 to 3-26-3, 3-27-1 to 3-27-9 and 3-28-1 to 3-28-20 NMSA 1978.

For municipal franchises, see 3-42-1 and 3-42-2 NMSA 1978.

For powers of counties, see 4-37-1 NMSA 1978.

For Uniform Unclaimed Property Act, see Chapter 7, Article 8A NMSA 1978.

For Business Corporation Act, see Chapter 53, Articles 11 to 18 NMSA 1978 NMSA 1978.

For certification of telephone and telegraph companies, see 63-9-1 to 63-9-19 NMSA 1978. Provisions applicable to telephone and telegraph companies. — Telephone and telegraph companies are subject to the provisions of this section, Sections 62-1-2, 62-1- 3 and 3-42-2 NMSA 1978. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Town of Belen, 1952- NMSC-053, 56 N.M. 415, 244 P.2d 1112.

A telephone company which generates electricity for the conduct of its business comes within the purview of Sections 62-1-1 to 62-1-3 NMSA 1978. City of Roswell v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co., 78 F.2d 379 (10th Cir. 1935).

Power of eminent domain. — Corporation, engaged as a public utility in furnishing telephone service to the public, has the power of eminent domain. State Hwy. Comm'n v. Ruidoso Tel. Co., 1963-NMSC-150, 73 N.M. 487, 389 P.2d 606.

Authorized foreign public utility may exercise eminent domain. — Under Sections 53-17-2 and 62-1-4 NMSA 1978 and this section, a foreign public utility authorized to do business in this state has the same right as a domestic public utility to exercise the power of eminent domain in this state. El Paso Elec. Co. v. Real Estate Mart, Inc., 1979- NMSC-023, 92 N.M. 581, 592 P.2d 181.

Supervision of foreign public utilities. — Foreign public utilities authorized to do business in this state are subject to the same supervision as utilities incorporated under the laws of this state. El Paso Elec. Co. v. Real Estate Mart, Inc., 1979-NMSC-023, 92 N.M. 581, 592 P.2d 181.

Sanitary projects association not public utility. — A sanitary projects association (see Article 29 of Chapter 3 NMSA 1978) was not transformed into a public utility by selling water to a limited number of nonmember water haulers and was not subject to the public service commission's (now public regulation commission's) regulatory jurisdiction. El Vadito De Los Cerrillos Water Ass'n v. N.M. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 1993- NMSC-041, 115 N.M. 784, 858 P.2d 1263.

Provisions applicable to telephone and telegraph companies. — Sections 62-1-1 to 62-1-3 NMSA 1978 are applicable to telephone utilities. 1963 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 63-66.

Application of provisions to pipeline companies. 1973 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 73-26 and 1957 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 57-124 (rendered prior to 1996 amendment of N.M. Const., art. XI, §2).

Law reviews. — For article, "The Regulation of Public Utilities," see 10 Nat. Res. J. 827 (1970).

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 18A Am. Jur. 2d Corporations § 150; 64 Am. Jur. 2d Public Utilities §§ 1, 2, 4, 82; 74 Am. Jur. 2d Telecommunications §§ 4, 8.

Authority from public official as affecting responsibility of public service corporation infringing property rights, 1 A.L.R. 403. Perpetual franchise, 2 A.L.R. 1105.

Bank which has acquired a public service plant bound to continue its operation, 8 A.L.R. 248.

Irrigation company as a public utility, 8 A.L.R. 268, 15 A.L.R. 1227.

What are "public utilities" within provisions relating to municipal purchase, construction or repair of public utility, 9 A.L.R. 1033, 35 A.L.R. 592.

Municipal corporations owning or operating a public utility as within public utility acts, 10 A.L.R. 1432, 18 A.L.R. 946.

Right of public utility company to discontinue its entire service, 11 A.L.R. 252.

Contract for service by public utility in consideration of conveyance of property as affected by public utility acts, 11 A.L.R. 460, 41 A.L.R. 257.

Regaining of private status by a corporation after having become subject to the duties and obligations of a public utility, 34 A.L.R. 175.

Competition by grantor of nonexclusive franchise as violation of constitutional rights of franchise holder, 114 A.L.R. 192.

Right of public utility not having an exclusive franchise to protection against, or damages for, interference with its operations, property or plant by a competitor, 119 A.L.R. 432.

Conclusiveness of charter as regards character of corporation as a public utility corporation, 119 A.L.R. 1019.

Right of public utility to discontinue line or branch on ground that it is unprofitable, 10 A.L.R.2d 1121.

Special requirements of consumer as giving rise to liability, based on implied contract, for failure to furnish particular amount of electricity, gas or water, 13 A.L.R.2d 1233.

Incidental provision of utility services, by party not in that business, as subject to regulation by state regulatory authority, 85 A.L.R.4th 894.

Liability of owner of wires, poles, or structures struck by aircraft for resulting injury or damage, 49 A.L.R.5th 659.

18 C.J.S. Corporations § 25 et seq.; 29 C.J.S. Electricity § 10(1); 38A C.J.S. Gas §§ 56, 57; 73B C.J.S. Public Utilities § 15; 82 C.J.S. Steam § 2; 86 C.J.S. Telecommunications § 18.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: Pub. Serv. Co. of New Mexico v. NEW MEXICO Pub. Util. Comm'n, 992 P.2d 860 (N.M. 1999).
Pub. Serv. Co. of New Mexico v. NEW MEXICO Pub. Util. Comm'n, 992 P.2d 860 (N.M. 1999). · cites it 2× “lack the authority under the New Mexico Public Utilities Act (NMPUA), NMSA 1978, §§ 62-1-1 to 62-6-26.1, 62-8-1 to 62-13-15 (1941, as amended through 1997, prior to 1998 amendment), 2 to seek a wheeling order from the Commission.”
State Ex Rel. Sandel v. New Mexico Pub. Util. Comm'n, 980 P.2d 55 (N.M. 1999). · cites it 2× “84 (codified in its present form at NMSA 1978, §§ 62-1-1 to 62-6-26.1, 62-8-1 to 62-13-14) (1941, as amended through 1997, prior to 1998 amendment).”
El Vadito De Los Cerrillos Water Ass'n v. New Mexico Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 858 P.2d 1263 (N.M. 1993). · cites it 2× “1984) ("[t]he commission shall have general and exclusive power and jurisdiction to regulate and supervise every public utility.”
El Paso Elec. Co. v. Real Est. Mart, Inc., 592 P.2d 181 (N.M. 1979). · cites it 4× “Defendants argue that EPEC and CPS do not have the power to condemn real property in New Mexico under § 62-1-4 because they are not “organized under the general incorporation laws of this state” pursuant to § 62-1-1, N.M.S.A.1978 (formerly § 68-1-1, N.”
Plains Elec. Generation & Transmission Coop. v. New Mexico Pub. Util. Comm'n, 967 P.2d 827 (N.M. 1998). · cites it 2× “The Commission fined Plains $8000 and suspended an additional fine of $72,000, subject to compliance with the Pinal Order, for violations of specific provisions of the New Mexico Public Utility Act (PUA), NMSA 1978, §§ 62-1-1 to 62-13-14 (1984, as amended through 1996, prior to…”
Fleming v. Town of Silver City, 992 P.2d 308 (N.M. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “On appeal to this Court, Appellants assert that the district court erred by failing to require that the Town comply with the requirements of the New Mexico Public Utility Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 62-1-1 to 62-13-14 (1887, as amended through 1996) (PUA), and the regulations of the New…”
El Paso Elec. Co. v. New Mexico Pub. Reg. Comm'n, 246 P.3d 443 (N.M. 2010). “Commission Jurisdiction Over Public Utility Rate Making {8} The Legislature mandated public utility regulation in the Public Utility Act (PUA), NMSA 1978, Sections 62-1-1 to -6-26.1 and -8-1 to -13-14 (1953, as amended through 2009).”
In Re Adjustments to Franchise Fees, 14 P.3d 525 (N.M. 2000). · cites it 2× “The Public Utility Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 62-1-1 to 62-13-14 (1887, as amended through 2000), "shall be liberally construed to carry out its purposes.”
Doña Ana Mut. Dom. Water Consumers Ass'n v. City of Las Cruces, 516 F.3d 900 (10th Cir. 2008). “Moongate is a public utility organized under the New Mexico Public Utilities Act, N.M. Stat. Ann. § 62-1-1 et seq. As a public utility, Moongate falls under the jurisdiction of the New Mexico Public Regulatory Commission (“PRC”).”
United Water New Mexico, Inc. v. New Mexico Pub. Util. Comm'n, 910 P.2d 906 (N.M. 1996). “Section 62-6-4(A) of the Act provides in relevant part, “The [PUC] shall have general and exclusive power and jurisdiction to regulate and supervise every public utility in respect to its rates and service regulations____” However, the Act also states that the PUC has no…”
Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. N.M. Pub. Reg. Com'n, 2015 NMSC 13 (N.M. 2015). · cites it 2× “” The Commission asks us to affirm its Order denying Tri-State’s interim rates because Tri-State 1 The entire PUA is set forth in NMSA 1978, §§ 62-1-1 to -7 (1909, as amended through 1993), 62-2-1 to -22 (1884, as amended through 2013), 62-3-1 to -5 (1967, as amended through…”
El Paso Elec. v. Real Est. Mart, Inc., 650 P.2d 12 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982). “141, now § 62-1-1 et seq., N.M.S.A.1978. The 1909 Act relates to corporations such as utilities who generate, produce, transmit, etc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.