green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Dumond v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
The fact that defendant is aggrieved by the prior summary judgment order is of no moment because the "Stipulation and Order" is not a final order or judgment, and it thus does not bring up for review that prior order ( see Crystal v Manes, 130 AD2d 979, 979 [4th Dept 1987]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Hayden
Moreover, Hayden's appeal from the July Order does not bring up for review prior orders in this action, because it is not "[a]n appeal from a final judgment" (CPLR 5501[a]; see also Crystal v Manes, 130 AD2d 979 [4th Dept 1987]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Hayden
Moreover, Hayden's appeal from the July Order does not bring up for review prior orders in this action, because it is not "[a]n appeal from a final judgment" (CPLR 5501[a]; see also Crystal v Manes, 130 AD2d 979 [4th Dept 1987]).
In the Matter of Warren Jones
v.
Walter R. Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility
v.
Walter R. Kelly, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 22, 1987.
Published
Judgment unanimously affirmed (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 125 AD2d 923, Iv granted 69 NY2d 608). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.—art 78.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.