People v. Tatum, 2020 NY Slip Op 05783 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Tatum, 2020 NY Slip Op 05783 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Brown (Donald) (nyappterm, 2024-06-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Brown (Donald)
N.Y. App. Term. · 2024 · confidence medium
"The information conveyed by the declarant during the 911 call was for the purpose of seeking police intervention and did not result from structured questioning" ( People v Long , 222 AD3d 881 , 882 [2023]; see People v Gittens , 214 AD3d 670, 671 [2023]; People v Thomas , 187 AD3d 949, 950 [2020]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Barreno (Yenson)
N.Y. App. Term. · 2022 · confidence medium
In any event, the challenged remarks were fair comment on the evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, fair response to defense counsel's summation, or permissible rhetorical comment ( see People v Thomas , 187 AD3d 949, 950 [2020]; People v Jagota , 178 AD3d 852 , 853 [2019]).
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Omar G.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
The mother made the call immediately after a startling and disturbing event, while she was still concerned for the safety of the two children in the apartment, and her demeanor indicated that the statements represented "impulsive and unreflecting responses" to the startling event ( People v Caviness , 38 NY2d 227, 231 ; see People v Thomas , 187 AD3d 949, 950 ; People v Jaber , 172 AD3d 1227 , 1230).
People
v.
Tatum
Ind. No. 377/18.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Oct 14, 2020.
2020 NY Slip Op 05783
Published
People v Tatum (2020 NY Slip Op 05783)
People v Tatum
2020 NY Slip Op 05783
Decided on October 14, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 14, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JEFFREY A. COHEN
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

2019-02724
(Ind. No. 377/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Kenneth J. Tatum, appellant.




Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Amanda E. Schaeffer of counsel), for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Marion Tang of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Richard Ambro, J.), imposed January 23, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).

BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN, CONNOLLY and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court