People v. Stanley, 21 A.D.3d 1289 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Stanley, 21 A.D.3d 1289 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Ippolito (nyappdiv, 2011-11-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Ippolito
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · confidence medium
In light of our decision, we need not address defendant’s further contention that the verdict with respect to those counts is against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Lawhorn, 21 AD3d 1289, 1291 [2005]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Chiarappa
N.Y. App. Div. · 2010 · confidence medium
County Court properly refused to consider the testimony of defendant concerning matters extraneous to the issue whether he failed to report to his probation officer (see generally People v Grace, 60 AD3d 432, 433 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 854 [2009]; People v Lawhorn, 21 AD3d 1289, 1291 [2005]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Garrison
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · confidence medium
In view of our determination, we need not address the contention of defendant that the verdict finding him guilty of depraved indifference murder is against the weight of the evidence on the elements of recklessness and depraved indifference (see People v Lawhorn, 21 AD3d 1289, 1291 [2005]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Richardson
N.Y. App. Div. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
The court therefore properly excluded the video on the ground that it did not "tend[] to prove the existence or non-existence of a material fact, i.e., a fact directly at issue in the case" ( People v Primo , 96 NY2d 351, 355 [2001]; see People v Lawhorn , 21 AD3d 1289, 1291 [4th Dept 2005]).
The People of the State of New York
v.
Carlos Stanley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Sep 30, 2005.
21 A.D.3d 1289
Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Timothy J. Drury, J.), rendered May 27, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Pine and Hayes, JJ.