Wilson v. Wilson, 21 A.D.3d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Wilson v. Wilson, 21 A.D.3d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Yatauro v. Mangano (nyappdiv, 2011-08-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Yatauro v. Mangano
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · confidence medium
Corp., 39 AD3d 738, 739 [2007]; Wilson v Wilson, 21 AD3d 548, 549 [2005]).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Transaero, Inc. v. Biri Associates Corp.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · confidence medium
References in the plaintiffs brief to evidence which is dehors the record have not been considered (see Wilson v Wilson, 21 AD3d 548, 549 [2005]).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Khan v. Dolly
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · confidence medium
Under the circumstances, the Family Court’s denial of his motion was not an improvident exercise of its discretion (see Wilson v Wilson, 21 AD3d 548, 548 [2005]; Cashdan v Cashdan, supra).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Conserve Electric, Inc. v. Tulger Contracting Corp.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2006 · confidence medium
Accordingly, the appellant’s contentions are not properly before us and may not be considered (see Wilson v Wilson, 21 AD3d 548, 549 [2005]).
discussed Cited "see" Matter of A.W.-R. v. H.R.
N.Y. Fam. Ct., Nassau Cty. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cashdan v Brodansky, 243 AD2d 598 (2d Dept 1997), Frevola v Frevola , 260 AD2d 480 (2d Dept 1999), Wilson v Wilson, ___ AD3d ___, 799 NYS2d 906 (2d Dept 2005) and LeMin v Central Suffolk Hospital (wherein counsel's application to be relieved was denied, where there was no proof of service in the record upon the client), 169 AD2d 821 (2d Dept 1991).
Margaret Kestler Wilson
v.
Bruce L. Wilson, Law Firm of Jerome A. Wisselman, P.C., Nonparty
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Aug 22, 2005.
21 A.D.3d 548
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the nonparty, Law Firm of Jerome A. Wisselman, PC., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated August 13, 2004, as denied its motion for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant, Bruce L. Wilson, and (2) an order of the same court dated December 23, 2004, as denied its motion for leave to renew.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the nonparty appellant’s motion for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant (see Matter of Frevola v Frevola, 260 AD2d 480 [1999]; Cashdan v Cashdan, 243 AD2d 598[*549] [1997]), and in denying its subsequent motion for leave to renew (see CPLR 2221 [e] [2], [3]).

The references in the briefs on appeal to evidence not considered by the Supreme Court, events occurring subsequent to the date of the orders appealed from, and other matter dehors the record are not properly before us and may not be considered (see Smith v Smith, 277 AD2d 531, 532 [2000]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are also not properly before us on this appeal and have not been considered. Adams, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ., concur.