Aiken v. Cnty. of Onondaga, 266 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Aiken v. Cnty. of Onondaga, 266 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Jackson (nyappdiv, 2007-08-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Jackson
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · confidence medium
The review of the recordings by the Cl— who wore the transmitter and participated in the recorded conversations with defendant and reviewed the tapes for the first time just prior to testifying—constituted trial preparation and not identification procedures within the ambit of CPL 710.30 and, thus, no notice regarding the Cl’s review was required (see People v Herner, 85 NY2d 877, 879 [1995]; People v Hopkins, 284 AD2d 223, 223 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 902 [2001]; People v Glover, 266 AD2d 862, 863 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 862 [1999]; People v Clark, 203 AD2d 935, 936 [1994], lv denied…
In the Matter of James Aiken
v.
County of Onondaga
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 12, 1999.
266 A.D.2d 862
Published

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Major, J. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Major, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Pine,-J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.