green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Torrico v. International Business MacHines Corp.
(2×)
See Jacoubovitch v. Jacoubovitch, 279 A.D. 1027 , 112 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1 (2d Dep’t 1952) (holding that non-U.S. citizens who entered United States on non-immigrant visas in connection with employment within the state were not precluded on that basis from establishing domicile in New York); Taubenfeld v. Taubenfeld, 276 A.D. 873 , 93 N.Y.S.2d 757 , 759 (2d Dep’t 1949) (holding that “the mere fact that plaintiff entered the United States on a transit visa does not establish as a matter of law that she may not acquire a domicile [in New York]”); Cocron v. Cocron, 84 Misc.2d 335 , 375 N.Y.S.2d …
discussed
Cited "see"
Grabowski v. Borucinska-Grabowska, No. Fa 93 54413 S (Feb. 10, 1994)
(2×)
See Jacoubovitch v. Jacoubovitch, 112 N.Y.S.2d 1 , 279 App.Div. 1027 , App. den. 113 N.Y.S.2d 446 , 279 App.Div. 1078 (1952) and Cocran v. Cocran, 375 N.Y.S.2d 797 (1975).
Anna Jacoubovitch
v.
Armand Jacoubovitch
v.
Armand Jacoubovitch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 21, 1952.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
Johnston, Acting J. P., Adel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur; Wenzel, J., concurs on the authority of Taubenfeld v. Taubenfeld (276 App. Div. 873) but adheres to the views expressed in his dissenting memorandum in that case. [See post, p. 1078.]