green
Positive treatment
17.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Giacopelli
(2×)
"Further, the [complainant's] basis of knowledge was sufficiently established by her familiarity with the defendant, his home, and his family, and the detailed description of the criminal activity which took place . . . at the defendant's home" ( People v Corr , 28 AD3d at 575).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Giacopelli
(2×)
"Further, the [complainant's] basis of knowledge was sufficiently established by her familiarity with the defendant, his home, and his family, and the detailed description of the criminal activity which took place . . . at the defendant's home" ( People v Corr , 28 AD3d at 575).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Bruno
To establish probable cause, "a search warrant application must provide the magistrate with information sufficient to support a reasonable belief that evidence of illegal activity will be present at the specific time and place" (People v Edwards, 69 NY2d 814, 816 [1987]; see People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 423 [1985]; People v Lambey, 176 AD3d 1232 , 1233 [2d Dept 2019]; People v Murray, 136 AD3d 714 [2d Dept 2016], Iv. denied 27 NY3d 1003 [2016] People v Leggio, 84 AD3d 11 _16, 1117 [2d Dept 2011]; People v Griffin, 28 AD3d 578, 578-579 [2d Dept 2006], Iv. denied 7 NY3d 789 [2006]; People v Co…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Suarez
To establish probable cause, "a search warrant application must provide the magistrate with information sufficient to- support a reasonable belief that evidence of illegal activity will be present at the specific time and place" (People v Edwards, 69 NY2d 814,816 [1987]; see People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417,423 [1985]; People v Lambey, 176 AD3d 1232 , 1233 [2d Dept 2019]; People v Murray, 136 AD3d 714 [2d Dept 2016], Iv .. denied 27 NY3d 1003 [2016] People v Leggio, 84 AD3d 1116, 1117 [2d Dept 2011]; People v Griffin, 28 AD3d 578, 578-579 [2d Dept 2006], lv. denied 7 NY3d 789 [2006]; People v Cor…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Cazeau
Further, the very detailed and specific information provided by MZ regarding the drugs and the gun, which was based on her firsthand observations, is sufficient to satisfy the second prong of the Aguilar-Spinelli test ( see People v Corr , 28 AD3d 574, 575 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 787 [2006]; People v Slater , 173 AD2d at 1026 ; People v Hitt , 61 AD2d at 857-858 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Cassese
The County Court did not err in denying suppression of the physical evidence that the police seized when they searched the defendant’s residence pursuant to a warrant based on probable cause (see People v Corr, 28 AD3d 574, 575 [2006]; People v Andujar, 187 AD2d 436, 437 [1992]; People v Sharpe, 157 AD2d 808, 809 [1990]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. LaFontant
Rather, the police had reasonable cause to forcibly stop and detain him, based upon the report of an identified citizen, a park employee, who saw him display a handgun in a public park (see People v Corr, 28 AD3d 574, 575 [2006]; People v Richards, 32 AD3d 545, 547 [2006]; People v Armsworth, 27 AD3d 571 [2006]; People v Green, 10 AD3d 664 [2004]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Pierre
It is understood that the “search warrant application must provide the court with sufficient information to support a reasonable belief that evidence of illegal activity will be present at the specific time and place of the search” (People v Williams, 249 AD2d 343 , 344 [2d Dept 1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 883 [1998]; see also People v Corr, 28 AD3d 574 [2d Dept 2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 787 [2006]).
The People of the State of New York
v.
Tyrone Cook, Also Known as Tyrone Cooke
v.
Tyrone Cook, Also Known as Tyrone Cooke
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 11, 2006.
Published
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), rendered November 15, 2004, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.