green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Betancourt
Moreover, there is no evidence that the defendant’s physical condition impaired or undermined his ability to freely choose whether to make a statement (see People v Williams, 97 AD3d 769, 770 [2012]; People v Legere, 81 AD3d 746, 747-748 [2011]; People v Timmons, 54 AD3d 883, 884-885 [2008]; People v Braithwaite, 286 AD2d 507, 507 [2001]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Betancourt
Moreover, there is no evidence that the defendant’s physical condition impaired or undermined his ability to freely choose whether to make a statement (see People v Williams, 97 AD3d 769, 770 [2012]; People v Legere, 81 AD3d 746, 747-748 [2011]; People v Timmons, 54 AD3d 883, 884-885 [2008]; People v Braithwaite, 286 AD2d 507, 507 [2001]).
The People of the State of New York
v.
Hugo Arias
v.
Hugo Arias
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Aug 27, 2001.
Published
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 14, 1994, which dismissed an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September, 18, 1990, and, in effect, to reinstate the appeal.
Ordered that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was . denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745). Bracken, P. J., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.