Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
The People v. Ramon Cabrera
NY · 2023 · confidence medium
Other cases reach a similar conclusion (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982] [same]; People v Gates, 24 NY2d 666, 669-670 [1969] [not reaching unpreserved claim under Davis v Mississippi, 394 US 721 (1969), because failure to timely object deprived People of opportunity to establish lawful grounds for arrest]; People v Friola, 11 NY2d 157, 158-160 [1962] [not reaching unpreserved claim under Mapp v Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961), because record contained no inquiry as to lawfulness of alleged search and seizure]).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
The People v. Nadine Panton
NY · 2016 · confidence medium
Because defendant did not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpre-served for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Turner
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · confidence medium
“Because that contention was not raised in defendant’s pretrial omnibus motion or at the suppression hearing, it has not been preserved for our review” (People v King, 284 AD2d 941 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 920 [2001]; see People v Coleman, 56 NY2d 269, 274 [1982]; People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Turner
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · confidence medium
“Because that contention was not raised in defendant’s pretrial omnibus motion or at the suppression hearing, it has not been preserved for our review” (People v King, 284 AD2d 941 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 920 [2001]; see People v Coleman, 56 NY2d 269, 274 [1982]; People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re Demitrus B.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · confidence medium
Respondent failed to preserve for our review his contention that the police improperly conducted a body cavity search without first obtaining a warrant to do so (see generally People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]; People v Fuentes, 52 AD3d 1297, 1298 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 736 [2008]; People v Ricks, 49 AD3d 1265, 1266 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 869 [2008], reconsideration denied 11 NY3d 740 [2008]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Robinson
N.Y. App. Div. · 2004 · confidence medium
Defendant failed to move to suppress evidence seized from his aunt’s apartment, where he ultimately was apprehended, and therefore failed to preserve for our review the contention in his pro se supplemental brief that the seizure of that evidence violated his constitutional right against unlawful search and seizure (see generally People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]; People v Dickerson, 148 AD2d 970 [1989], rearg granted on other grounds 149 AD2d 985 [1989], lv denied 74 NY2d 739 [1989]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Diggs
N.Y. App. Div. · 2004 · confidence medium
The defendant’s further contention that these showup identifications, made subsequent to an initial showup identification by another witness, should have been suppressed in the absence of exigent circumstances is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]; People v Martin, 50 NY2d 1029, 1031 [1980]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Campbell
N.Y. App. Div. · 1995 · confidence medium
We note that defendant has not claimed, either below or on appeal, that her arrest was invalid because it was made without a warrant, and the issue is clearly unpreserved (see, People v Claudio, 64 NY2d 858 ; People v Smith, 55 NY2d 888, 890; People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888).