green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re New York Asbestos Litigation
Smith & Sons, Inc., 751 F.Supp. 1052, 1055-56 (N.D.N.Y.1990) (interest calculated for purposes of E.P.T.L. § 5-4.3(a) after deducting amounts to which recovering plaintiff is not entitled); accord Duffy v. New York, 7 A.D.2d 988 , 183 N.Y.S.2d 863, 864 (1959) (interest should be calculated on difference between verdict and settlement amount) (interpreting Decedent Estate Law § 132, later re-enacted as E.P.T.L. § 5-4.3).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Toledo v. IGLESIA NI CHRISTO
(2×)
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 245 AD2d 326, 327 [2d Dept 1997]), and that such interest should run from the *368 date of death to the date of verdict ( see Alfieri v Cabot Corp., 17 AD2d 455, 461 [1st Dept 1962] ["interest from the date of the wrongful death is an element of damages"]; see also Duffy v City of New York, 7 AD2d 988, 988 [1st Dept 1959]).
In the Matter of 236-40 W. 27th St. Corporation, against William E. Boyland, Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Mar 31, 1959.
Published
Order unanimously modified on the facts so as to fix the values for the property designated as 236-40 West 27th Street, Manhattan, for the tax years 1955-1956, 1956-1957 and 1957-1958, as follows:
Land —$75,000, Building — $350,000, Total—• $425,000; and as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to appellant. The values fixed by Special Term, on this record, are not justified. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., M. M. Prank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.