Tatum v. Tatum, 348 S.E.2d 813 (N.C. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Tatum v. Tatum, 348 S.E.2d 813 (N.C. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“plaintiff failed to move for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence. therefore, plaintiff failed to preserve her right to move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.”
21 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rcjj, LLC v. Rcwil Enters., LLC (ncbizct, 2017-03-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Rcjj, LLC v. Rcwil Enters., LLC (2×) also: Cited as authority (quoted)
N.C. Bus. Ct. · 2017 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
plaintiff failed to move for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence. therefore, plaintiff failed to preserve her right to move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
cited Cited as authority (rule) City of Charlotte v. Hurlahe
N.C. Ct. App. · 2006 · confidence medium
Therefore, plaintiff failed to preserve [the] right to move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.” Tatum v. Tatum, 318 N.C. 407, 408 , 348 S.E.2d 813, 813 (1986) (citation omitted).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Word v. Jones Ex Rel. Moore
N.C. · 1999 · confidence medium
Tatum v. Tatum, 318 N.C. 407, 408 , 348 S.E.2d 813, 813 (1986); Graves v. Walston, 302 N.C. 332, 338 , 275 S.E.2d 485, 488-89 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Boone Ford, Inc. v. IME Scheduler, Inc. (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
App. ----, ----, 811 S.E.2d 191 , 195 (2018) ; see also Tatum v. Tatum , 318 N.C. 407 , 408, 348 S.E.2d 813 , 813 (1986) ("Plaintiff failed to move for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence.
Jean S. Tatum
v.
Frank Tatum
161A86.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 7, 1986.
348 S.E.2d 813
Arthur Vann for plaintiff-appellant. , Bryant, Drew & Patterson, P.A., by Victor S. Bryant, Jr., for defendant-appellee.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: North Carolina Business Court (2)
PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff assigns as error the denial by the trial judge of her motion to set aside the verdict of the jury on the issue of contributory negligence. This motion was in effect a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict pursuant to Rule 50(b)(1) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff failed to move for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence. Therefore, plaintiff failed to preserve her right to move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Graves v. Walston, 302 N.C. 332, 275 S.E. 2d 485 (1981).

Modified and affirmed.