State v. Houston, 617 S.E.2d 281 (N.C. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Houston, 617 S.E.2d 281 (N.C. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Sevilla-Briones (ncctapp, 2014-10-07)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Sevilla-Briones
N.C. Ct. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
Id. at 372, 610 S.E.2d at 781 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Doe
N.C. Ct. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
“The only requirement for a valid consent search is the voluntary consent given by a party who had reasonably apparent authority to grant or withhold such consent.” Id. at 371, 610 S.E.2d at 780 (citing N.C.
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Santiago Montez HOUSTON.
219P05.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 30, 2005.
617 S.E.2d 281
Published

Brian Michael Aus, Durham, for Santiago Montez Houston.

W. Dale Talbert, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

[*282] ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 26th day of April 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th day of April 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."