State v. . Webb (Sup. Ct. N.C. 1794). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. . Webb (Sup. Ct. N.C. 1794). Book View Copy Cite
“no man shall be prejudiced by evidence which he had not the liberty to cross-examine”
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Lewis (ncctapp, 2004-10-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) State v. Lewis
N.C. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
no man shall be prejudiced by evidence which he had not the liberty to cross-examine
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Lester
N.C. Ct. App. · 2023 · confidence medium
Crawford, 541 U.S. at 42 , 158 L.Ed.2d at 187 ; State v. Webb, 2 N.C. 103, 104 (1794) (per curiam) (“no man shall be prejudiced by evidence which he had not the liberty to cross-examine”). 4.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Doe v. Brandeis University
D. Mass. · 2016 · confidence medium
XII (“[Ejvery subject shall have a right ... to meet the witnesses against him face to face ....”); see generally Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 43-45 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004); State v. Webb, 2 N.C. 103, 104 (Super.L. & Eq.1794) ("[I]t is a rule of the common law, founded on natural justice, that no man shall be prejudiced by evidence which he had not the liberty to cross examine.”). .Such a limitation is expressly set out in the April 2011 "Dear Colleague Letter”: OCR strongly discourages schools from allowing the parties personally to question or cross-examine …
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rankins v. Commonwealth (2×)
Ky. · 2007 · confidence medium
These issues were not appealed by either side. [4] "[I]t is a rule of the common law, founded on natural justice, that no man shall be prejudiced by evidence which he had not the liberty to cross examine." Crawford, 541 U.S. at 49 , 124 S.Ct. at 1363 , 158 L.Ed.2d at 191 (quoting State v. Webb, 2 N.C. 103, 104 (Super.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
SCOTUS · 2006 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
Cf. Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36, 49 (2004) (“ ‘It is a rule of the common law, founded on natural justice, that no man shall be prejudiced by evidence which he had not the liberty to cross examine’ ” (quoting State v. Webb, 2 N. C. 103, 104 (Super.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Davis v. Washington (2×)
SCOTUS · 2006 · confidence medium
As in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (2004), therefore, our holding today makes it unnecessary to consider whether and when statements made to someone other than law enforcement personnel are "testimonial." [3] See, e. g., State v. Webb, 2 N. C. 103, 103-104 (Super.
State
v.
Webb.
Superior Court of North Carolina.
Sep 5, 1794.
ASHE and WILLIAMS, JJ..
Cited by 17 opinions  |  Published

(104) These authorities do not say that depositions taken in the absence of the prisoner shall be read, and our act of Assembly, 1715, ch. 16, clearly implies the depositions to be read must be taken in his presence. It is a rule of the common law, founded on natural justice, that no man shall be prejudiced by evidence which he had not the liberty to cross-examine; and though it be insisted that the act intended to make an exception, in this instance, to the rule of the common law, yet the act has not expressly said so, and we will not, by implication, derogate from the salutory rules established by the common law.

So the deposition was rejected.