NC General Statutes
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-4 (2026)
Kinds of actions
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NCLEGncleg.gov (official)
JustiaChapter 1
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Actions are of two kinds -
(1) Civil.
(2) Criminal. (C.C.P., s. 4; Code, s. 128; Rev., s. 349; C.S., s. 394.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1954–2017 · leading case: Harris v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 420 S.E.2d 124 (N.C. 1992).
Harris v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 420 S.E.2d 124 (N.C. 1992). “NOTES [1] Under N.C.G.S. § 20-279.21(b)(4), as it existed at the time of the accident, the UIM limits in any given policy were identical to the liability limits.”
Bass v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mut. Ins., 418 S.E.2d 221 (N.C. 1992). “646, §§ 1-4. However, the amendments do not affect claims arising or litigation pending prior to the amendments.”
State v. Santifort, 809 S.E.2d 213 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017). “2 Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-4 , "actions" are either civil or criminal.”
In Re Clark, 281 S.E.2d 47 (N.C. 1981). “1-3, G.S. 1-4. If this is a civil action, the Rules apply, G.”
State v. Gamez, 745 S.E.2d 876 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013). “Session Law 2011-317 was signed by the Governor on 27 June 2011. Based upon the amendment-to Session Law 2011-283, the amendments to Rule 702 became effective 1 October 2011 and apply to actions arising on or after that date.”
State v. Patterson, 220 S.E.2d 600 (N.C. 1975). “299, §§ 1-4. This proviso remained in effect until this Court in State v.”
First Nat. Bank of Anson Cty. v. Nationwide Ins., 278 S.E.2d 507 (N.C. 1981). “58-30.2. The type of group life insurance involved in this case is defined in G.”
Stikeleather Realty & Invs. Co. v. Broadway, 775 S.E.2d 373 (N.C. Ct. App. 2015). “92, § 1-4 (replacing the word "detector" with "alarm" throughout provisions of the Residential Rental Agreements Act).”
Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Alcan Aluminum Corp., 921 F. Supp. 2d 488 (E.D.N.C. 2013). “16-17, 27-28, 31, 47-48, 51, 81-82; infra sections 1-4. Plaintiffs’ evidence consists of testimony of Ward employees about how all types of transformers were drained there and the residual oil that resulted, and not on the double pumping method used by Georgia Power.”
Nationwide Mut. Ins. v. Silverman, 423 S.E.2d 68 (N.C. 1992). “646, §§ 1-4. However, the amendments do not affect claims arising or litigation pending prior to the amendments.”
Mahan v. Read, 83 S.E.2d 706 (N.C. 1954). “Sections 52A-27 through 52A-30 of our statute correspond to sections 1-4 of the 1950 Uniform Act, which appear under caption, “Part I — General Provisions.”
Matter of Custody of Bhatti, 391 S.E.2d 201 (N.C. Ct. App. 1990). “§ 50A-3, subsections 1-4 and 28 U.S.C.A. § 1738A(c); see also Schrock v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.