NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-50 (2026)

Review by superior court without jury

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 150B CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The review by a superior court of administrative decisions under this Chapter shall be conducted by the court without a jury. (1973, c. 1331, s. 1; 1983, c. 919, s. 2; 1985, c. 746, s. 1; 1987, c. 878, s. 18; 2011-398, s. 26.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases, 1992–2006 · leading case: Peace v. Emp. SEC. Com'n of North Carolina, 507 S.E.2d 272 (N.C. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Peace v. Emp. SEC. Com'n of North Carolina, 507 S.E.2d 272 (N.C. 1998). · cites it 6× “The ESC petitioned for judicial review of the SPC decision and the ALJ decision separately, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 150B-50. In a 12 August 1994 order, Superior Court Judge Narley L.”

Amanini v. N.C. Dep't of Human Resources, 443 S.E.2d 114 (N.C. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 3× “”), and stating review by the superior court shall be conducted without a jury, see N.C.G.S. § 150B-50 (1991), the APA sets forth the permissible dispositions upon judicial review of a final agency decision: [T]he court reviewing a final decision may affirm the decision of the…”

Huang v. North Carolina State Univ., 421 S.E.2d 812 (N.C. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 3× “N.C.G.S. § 150B-50 (1991). Huang specifically requested a jury trial.”

Hedgepeth v. North Carolina Div. of Servs. for the Blind, 543 S.E.2d 169 (N.C. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “However, final agency decisions pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act are not exempt from review under section 150B-50(b), which states, in pertinent part: [T]he court reviewing a final decision may affirm the decision of the agency or remand the case for further proceedings.”

Emp. Sec. Comm'n v. Peace, 493 S.E.2d 466 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “ESC appealed SPC's final decision and the ALJ's final decision separately, pursuant to N.C.Gen.Stat. § 150B-50 (1987). In a 13 August 1994 order, Judge Narley L.”

Vulcan Materials Co. v. Guilford Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 444 S.E.2d 639 (N.C. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 3× “The court then reversed the denial of the special use permits and ordered the Board to issue permits for the entire 235 acre tract of land.”

Hardee v. North Carolina Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, 596 S.E.2d 324 (N.C. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “, the person seeking review must file a petition in the Superior Court of Wake County. . . .” N.”

In Re Lustgarten, 629 S.E.2d 886 (N.C. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-50 (2005). [T]he court may affirm the decision .”

Emp. Sec. Comm'n v. Peace, 470 S.E.2d 63 (N.C. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “ESC appealed the State Personnel Commission order and the AU final decision separately, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-50 (1995). In a 13 August 1994 order, Judge Narley L.”

— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-50(b) — 1 case

Hedgepeth v. North Carolina Div. of Servs. for the Blind, 543 S.E.2d 169 (N.C. Ct. App. 2001). “However, final agency decisions pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act are not exempt from review under section 150B-50(b), which states, in pertinent part: [T]he court reviewing a final decision may affirm the decision of the agency or remand the case for further proceedings.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.