N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-4
Broad construction
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NCLEGncleg.gov (official)
JustiaChapter 153A
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
It is the policy of the General Assembly that the counties of this State should have adequate authority to exercise the powers, rights, duties, functions, privileges, and immunities conferred upon them by law. To this end, the provisions of this Chapter and of local acts shall be broadly construed and grants of power shall be construed to include any powers that are reasonably expedient to the exercise of the power. (1973, c. 822, s. 1.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2023 · leading case: Lanvale Properties, LLC v. County of Cabarrus
Lanvale Properties, LLC v. County of Cabarrus (2012)
“2d at 658 ), or when its application is necessary to give effect to “any powers that are reasonably expedient to [a county’s] exercise of the power,” see N.C.G.S. § 153A-4. 8 Sections 153A-340(a) and 153A-341 express in unambiguous language the General Assembly’s intent to…”
Durham Land Owners Ass'n v. County of Durham (2006)
“2d 475, 482 (1990) (quotations and citations omitted), and its enabling legislation is to be read broadly, see N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-4 (2005). Determining whether the County’s impact fees are supported by the authority granted to it in N.”
Williams v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of NC (2003)
“Counterclaim defendants also cite to N.C.G.S. § 153A-4 (“Broad construction"), N.”
Maready v. City of Winston-Salem (1996)
“N.C.G.S. § 153A-4 contains similar language applicable to counties.”
Point S. Props., LLC v. Cape Fear Pub. Util. Auth. (2015)
“Defendants direct our attention to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 153A-4, which states that: *524 It is the policy of the General Assembly that the counties of this State should have adequate authority to exercise the powers, rights, duties, functions, privileges, and immunities conferred…”
County of Lancaster v. Mecklenburg County (1993)
“While N.C.G.S. §§ 153A-4 and 160A-4 mandate that grants of authority to local governments be broadly interpreted, zoning authority cannot be exercised in a manner contrary to the express provisions of the zoning enabling authority.”
Huntington Properties, LLC v. Currituck County (2002)
“” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-4 (2001) states: It is the policy of the General Assembly that the counties of this State should have adequate authority to exercise the powers, rights, duties, functions, privileges, and immunities conferred upon them by law.”
Three Guys Real Estate v. Harnett County (1997)
“Defendants further argue that the statutory mandate that this chapter of the General Statutes should be construed broadly, see N.C.G.S. § 153A-4 (1991), requires a holding that plaintiffs plat is not exempt so that the purpose is not circumvented.”
Town of Green Level v. Alamance County (2007)
“Further, although N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-4 “mandate[s] that grants of authority to local governments be broadly interpreted, zoning authority cannot be exercised in a manner contrary to the express provisions of the zoning enabling authority.”
Five C's, Inc. v. County of Pasquotank (2009)
“N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-4 (2001) states: It is the policy of the General Assembly that the counties of this State should have adequate authority to exercise the powers, rights, duties, functions, privileges, and immunities conferred upon them by law.”
Berger v. New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs (2013)
“N.C.G.S. § 153A-4 directs that: It is the policy of the General Assembly that the counties of this State should have adequate authority to exercise the powers, rights, duties, functions, privileges, and immunities conferred upon them by law.”
Summey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. County of Henderson (1989)
“Our Legislature, in G.S. 153A-4, mandated that Chapter 153A and local acts “shall be broadly construed and grants of power shall be construed to include any powers that are reasonably expedient to the exercise of that power.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.