NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 62-153 (2026)

Contracts of public utilities with certain companies and for services

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 62 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) All public utilities shall file with the Commission copies of contracts with any affiliated or subsidiary holding, managing, operating, constructing, engineering, financing or purchasing company or agency, and when requested by the Commission, copies of contracts with any person selling service of any kind. The Commission may disapprove, after hearing, any such contract if it is found to be unjust or unreasonable, and made for the purpose or with the effect of concealing, transferring or dissipating the earnings of the public utility. Such contracts so disapproved by the Commission shall be void and shall not be carried out by the public utility which is a party thereto, nor shall any payments be made thereunder. Provided, however, that in the case of motor carriers of passengers this subsection shall apply only to such contracts as the Commission shall request such carriers to file.

(b) No public utility shall pay any fees, commissions or compensation of any description whatsoever to any affiliated or subsidiary holding, managing, operating, constructing, engineering, financing or purchasing company or agency for services rendered or to be rendered without first filing copies of all proposed agreements and contracts with the Commission and obtaining its approval. Provided, however, that this subsection shall not apply to (i) motor carriers of passengers or (ii) power purchase agreements entered into pursuant to the competitive renewable energy procurement process established pursuant to G.S. 62-110.8. (1931, c. 455; 1933, c. 134, s. 8; c. 307, s. 17; 1941, c. 97; 1963, c. 1165, s. 1; 2017-192, s. 2(b).)

 

§ 62-154.  Surplus power rates.

The Commission is authorized to investigate the sale of surplus electric power and the rates made for such energy, and to prescribe reasonable rules and rates for such sales. (1963, c. 1165, s. 1.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1970–1982 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Gen. Tel. Co. of the Se., 189 S.E.2d 705 (N.C. 1972).
State Ex Rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Gen. Tel. Co. of the Se., 189 S.E.2d 705 (N.C. 1972). · cites it 3× “G.S. § 62-153, which authorizes the Commission, after hearing, to disapprove and declare void contracts between a public utility and certain types of affiliated corporations is not before us in the present case and nothing herein may be deemed to limit the powers granted to the…”
State Ex Rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Intervenor Residents of Bent Creek/Mt. Carmel Subdivisions, 286 S.E.2d 770 (N.C. 1982). · cites it 4× “I Intervenor/Residents’ first argument before the Court of Appeals was the the Commission, in establishing new rates, should not have considered certain expenses allocated to the Company because they reflected charges for services rendered by affiliated companies pursuant to…”
State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Intervenor Residents of Bent Creek/Mt. Carmel Subdivisions, 278 S.E.2d 761 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 4× “Intervenors’ first argument is that the Utilities Commission should not have considered the expenses allocated from CWS and WSC in establishing new rates because they reflected charges for services rendered by affiliated corporations pursuant to contracts not filed with an…”
State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Morgan, 173 S.E.2d 479 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970). “The Commission cannot permit parent holding companies to use affiliate companies as a device for transmitting an unreasonable level of profits to such parent holding company from goods or services supplied the operating company by way of an affiliate company (G.S. 62-153). It is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.