The superior court division is the proper division, without regard to the amount in controversy, for the hearing and trial of all special proceedings except proceedings under the Protection of the Abused, Neglected or Exploited Disabled Adult Act (Article 6 of Chapter 108A of the General Statutes), proceedings for the protection of disabled and older adults from financial exploitation (Article 6A of Chapter 108A of the General Statutes), proceedings for involuntary commitment to treatment facilities (Article 5 of Chapter 122C of the General Statutes), adoption proceedings (Chapter 48 of the General Statutes), and of all proceedings involving the appointment of guardians and the administration by legal guardians and trustees of express trusts of the estates of their wards and beneficiaries, according to the practice and procedure provided by law for the particular proceeding. (1965, c. 310, s. 1; 1973, c. 726, s. 5; c. 1378, s. 3; 1981, c. 682, s. 1; 1985, c. 689, s. 4; 1995, c. 88, s. 7; 2014-115, s. 44(c).)
Notes of Decisions
In Re the Investigation of the Death of Miller, 584 S.E.2d 772 (N.C. 2003).
· cites it 3× “§ 1-3 (2001), and we note that while this action was not commenced in strict accord with the usual process as set forth in the North Carolina General Statutes, N.”
Johns v. Welker, 744 S.E.2d 486 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 2× “§ 7A-244 (2011), and jurisdiction over contested adoptions, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 7A-246, 48-2-601(1a) (2011).”
In the Matter of Legitimation of Locklear by Jones, 334 S.E.2d 46 (N.C. 1985).
“Furthermore, G.S. 7A-246 provides: The superior court division is the proper division, without regard to the amount in controversy, for the hearing and trial of all special proceedings except proceedings under the Protection of the Abused or Neglected Elderly Act (Chapter 108,…”
In Re Albemarle Mental Health Ctr., 256 S.E.2d 818 (N.C. Ct. App. 1979).
“See G.S. 7A-246. The judicial power of the superior court is that which is granted by the Constitution and laws of the State.”
In Re: Wash. Cty. Sheriff's Off., No. 18-653 (N.C. Ct. App. May 5, 2020).
“Occasionally, however, the proscribed (sic) procedures of a statutory scheme fail to embrace the unanticipated and extraordinary proceeding such as that disclosed by the record before us.”
In Re: Wash. Cty. Sheriff's Off., No. 18-653 (N.C. Ct. App. May 5, 2020).
“Occasionally, however, the proscribed (sic) procedures of a statutory scheme fail to embrace the unanticipated and extraordinary proceeding such as that disclosed by the record before us.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.