Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412

Case plans

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) Each public children services agency and private child placing agency shall prepare and maintain a case plan for any child to whom the agency is providing services and to whom any of the following applies:

(1) The agency filed a complaint pursuant to section 2151.27 of the Revised Code alleging that the child is an abused, neglected, or dependent child;

(2) The agency has temporary or permanent custody of the child;

(3) The child is living at home subject to an order for protective supervision;

(4) The child is in a planned permanent living arrangement.

Except as provided by division (A)(2) of section 5103.153 of the Revised Code, a private child placing agency providing services to a child who is the subject of a voluntary permanent custody surrender agreement entered into under division (B)(4) of section 5103.15 of the Revised Code is not required to prepare and maintain a case plan for that child.

(B) Each public children services agency shall prepare and maintain a case plan for any child for whom the agency is providing in-home services pursuant to an alternative response.

(C)(1) The director of children and youth shall adopt rules pursuant to Chapter 119. of the Revised Code setting forth the content and format of case plans required by division (A) of this section and establishing procedures for developing, implementing, and changing the case plans. The rules shall at a minimum comply with the requirements of Title IV-E of the "Social Security Act," 42 U.S.C. 670, et seq. (1980).

(2) The director of children and youth shall adopt rules pursuant to Chapter 119. of the Revised Code requiring public children services agencies and private child placing agencies to maintain case plans for children and their families who are receiving services in their homes from the agencies and for whom case plans are not required by division (A) of this section. The rules for public children services agencies shall include the requirements for case plans maintained for children and their families who are receiving services in their homes from public children services agencies pursuant to an alternative response. The agencies shall maintain case plans as required by those rules; however, the case plans shall not be subject to any other provision of this section except as specifically required by the rules.

(D) Each public children services agency and private child placing agency that is required by division (A) of this section to maintain a case plan shall file the case plan with the court prior to the child's adjudicatory hearing but no later than thirty days after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care. If the agency does not have sufficient information prior to the adjudicatory hearing to complete any part of the case plan, the agency shall specify in the case plan the additional information necessary to complete each part of the case plan and the steps that will be taken to obtain that information. All parts of the case plan shall be completed by the earlier of thirty days after the adjudicatory hearing or the date of the dispositional hearing for the child.

(E) Any agency that is required by division (A) of this section to prepare a case plan shall attempt to obtain an agreement among all parties, including, but not limited to, the parents, guardian, or custodian of the child and the guardian ad litem of the child regarding the content of the case plan. If all parties agree to the content of the case plan and the court approves it, the court shall journalize it as part of its dispositional order. If the agency cannot obtain an agreement upon the contents of the case plan or the court does not approve it, the parties shall present evidence on the contents of the case plan at the dispositional hearing. The court, based upon the evidence presented at the dispositional hearing and the best interest of the child, shall determine the contents of the case plan and journalize it as part of the dispositional order for the child.

(F)(1) All parties, including the parents, guardian, or custodian of the child, are bound by the terms of the journalized case plan. A party that fails to comply with the terms of the journalized case plan may be held in contempt of court.

(2) Any party may propose a change to a substantive part of the case plan, including, but not limited to, the child's placement and the visitation rights of any party. A party proposing a change to the case plan shall file the proposed change with the court and give notice of the proposed change in writing before the end of the day after the day of filing it to all parties and the child's guardian ad litem. All parties and the guardian ad litem shall have seven days from the date the notice is sent to object to and request a hearing on the proposed change.

(a) If it receives a timely request for a hearing, the court shall schedule a hearing pursuant to section 2151.417 of the Revised Code to be held no later than thirty days after the request is received by the court. The court shall give notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing to all parties and the guardian ad litem. The agency may implement the proposed change after the hearing, if the court approves it. The agency shall not implement the proposed change unless it is approved by the court.

(b) If it does not receive a timely request for a hearing, the court may approve the proposed change without a hearing. If the court approves the proposed change without a hearing, it shall journalize the case plan with the change not later than fourteen days after the change is filed with the court. If the court does not approve the proposed change to the case plan, it shall schedule a hearing to be held pursuant to section 2151.417 of the Revised Code no later than thirty days after the expiration of the fourteen-day time period and give notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing to all parties and the guardian ad litem of the child. If, despite the requirements of division (F)(2) of this section, the court neither approves and journalizes the proposed change nor conducts a hearing, the agency may implement the proposed change not earlier than fifteen days after it is submitted to the court.

(3) If an agency has reasonable cause to believe that a child is suffering from illness or injury and is not receiving proper care and that an appropriate change in the child's case plan is necessary to prevent immediate or threatened physical or emotional harm, to believe that a child is in immediate danger from the child's surroundings and that an immediate change in the child's case plan is necessary to prevent immediate or threatened physical or emotional harm to the child, or to believe that a parent, guardian, custodian, or other member of the child's household has abused or neglected the child and that the child is in danger of immediate or threatened physical or emotional harm from that person unless the agency makes an appropriate change in the child's case plan, it may implement the change without prior agreement or a court hearing and, before the end of the next day after the change is made, give all parties, the guardian ad litem of the child, and the court notice of the change. Before the end of the third day after implementing the change in the case plan, the agency shall file a statement of the change with the court and give notice of the filing accompanied by a copy of the statement to all parties and the guardian ad litem. All parties and the guardian ad litem shall have ten days from the date the notice is sent to object to and request a hearing on the change.

(a) If it receives a timely request for a hearing, the court shall schedule a hearing pursuant to section 2151.417 of the Revised Code to be held no later than thirty days after the request is received by the court. The court shall give notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing to all parties and the guardian ad litem. The agency shall continue to administer the case plan with the change after the hearing, if the court approves the change. If the court does not approve the change, the court shall make appropriate changes to the case plan and shall journalize the case plan.

(b) If it does not receive a timely request for a hearing, the court may approve the change without a hearing. If the court approves the change without a hearing, it shall journalize the case plan with the change within fourteen days after receipt of the change. If the court does not approve the change to the case plan, it shall schedule a hearing under section 2151.417 of the Revised Code to be held no later than thirty days after the expiration of the fourteen-day time period and give notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing to all parties and the guardian ad litem of the child.

(G)(1) All case plans for children in temporary custody shall have the following general goals:

(a) Consistent with the best interest and special needs of the child, to achieve a safe out-of-home placement in the least restrictive, most family-like setting available and in close proximity to the home from which the child was removed or the home in which the child will be permanently placed;

(b) To eliminate with all due speed the need for the out-of-home placement so that the child can safely return home.

(2) The director of children and youth shall adopt rules pursuant to Chapter 119. of the Revised Code setting forth the general goals of case plans for children subject to dispositional orders for protective supervision, a planned permanent living arrangement, or permanent custody.

(H) In the agency's development of a case plan and the court's review of the case plan, the child's health and safety shall be the paramount concern. The agency and the court shall be guided by the following general priorities:

(1) A child who is residing with or can be placed with the child's parents within a reasonable time should remain in their legal custody even if an order of protective supervision is required for a reasonable period of time;

(2) If both parents of the child have abandoned the child, have relinquished custody of the child, have become incapable of supporting or caring for the child even with reasonable assistance, or have a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and best interest of the child, the child should be placed in the legal custody of a suitable member of the child's extended family;

(3) If a child described in division (H)(2) of this section has no suitable member of the child's extended family to accept legal custody, the child should be placed in the legal custody of a suitable nonrelative who shall be made a party to the proceedings after being given legal custody of the child;

(4) If the child has no suitable member of the child's extended family to accept legal custody of the child and no suitable nonrelative is available to accept legal custody of the child and, if the child temporarily cannot or should not be placed with the child's parents, guardian, or custodian, the child should be placed in the temporary custody of a public children services agency or a private child placing agency;

(5) If the child cannot be placed with either of the child's parents within a reasonable period of time or should not be placed with either, if no suitable member of the child's extended family or suitable nonrelative is available to accept legal custody of the child, and if the agency has a reasonable expectation of placing the child for adoption, the child should be committed to the permanent custody of the public children services agency or private child placing agency;

(6) If the child is to be placed for adoption or foster care, the placement shall not be delayed or denied on the basis of the child's or adoptive or foster family's race, color, or national origin.

(I) The case plan for a child in temporary custody shall include at a minimum the following requirements if the child is or has been the victim of abuse or neglect or if the child witnessed the commission in the child's household of abuse or neglect against a sibling of the child, a parent of the child, or any other person in the child's household:

(1) A requirement that the child's parents, guardian, or custodian participate in mandatory counseling;

(2) A requirement that the child's parents, guardian, or custodian participate in any supportive services that are required by or provided pursuant to the child's case plan.

(J)(1) Prior to January 1, 2023, a case plan for a child in temporary custody may include, as a supplement, a plan for locating a permanent family placement. The supplement shall not be considered part of the case plan for purposes of division (E) of this section.

(2) On and after January 1, 2023, a case plan for a child in temporary custody shall include a permanency plan for the child unless it is documented that such a plan would not be in the best interest of the child. The permanency plan shall describe the services the agency shall provide to achieve permanency for the child if reasonable efforts to return the child to the child's home, or eliminate the continued removal from that home, are unsuccessful. Those services shall be provided concurrently with reasonable efforts to return the child home or eliminate the child's continued removal from home.

(3) The director of children and youth, pursuant to Chapter 119. of the Revised Code, shall adopt rules necessary to carry out the purposes of division (J) of this section.

(K)(1) A public children services agency may request that the superintendent of the bureau of criminal identification and investigation conduct a criminal records check with respect to a parent, guardian, custodian, prospective custodian, or prospective placement whose actions result in a finding after the filing of a complaint as described in division (A)(1) of this section that a child is an abused, neglected, or dependent child. The public children services agency shall request that the superintendent obtain information from the federal bureau of investigation as part of the criminal records check.

(2) At any time on or after the date that is ninety days after September 10, 2012, a prosecuting attorney, or an assistant prosecuting attorney appointed under section 309.06 of the Revised Code, may request that the superintendent of the bureau of criminal identification and investigation conduct a criminal records check with respect to each parent, guardian, custodian, prospective custodian, or prospective placement whose actions resulted in a finding after the filing of a complaint described in division (A)(1) of this section that a child is an abused, neglected, or dependent child. Each prosecuting attorney or assistant prosecuting attorney who makes such a request shall request that the superintendent obtain information from the federal bureau of investigation as part of the criminal records check for each parent, guardian, custodian, prospective custodian, or prospective placement who is a subject of the request.

(3) A public children services agency, prosecuting attorney, or assistant prosecuting attorney that requests a criminal records check under division (K)(1) or (2) of this section shall do both of the following:

(a) Provide to each parent, guardian, custodian, prospective custodian, or prospective placement for whom a criminal records check is requested a copy of the form prescribed pursuant to division (C)(1) of section 109.572 of the Revised Code and a standard fingerprint impression sheet prescribed pursuant to division (C)(2) of that section and obtain the completed form and impression sheet from the parent, guardian, custodian, prospective custodian, or prospective placement;

(b) Forward the completed form and impression sheet to the superintendent of the bureau of criminal identification and investigation.

(4) A parent, guardian, custodian, prospective custodian, or prospective placement who is given a form and fingerprint impression sheet under division (K)(3)(a) of this section and who fails to complete the form or provide fingerprint impressions may be held in contempt of court.

Last updated February 4, 2025 at 10:23 AM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 298 cases (97 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: In re K.B.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re K.B. (2024) ohioctapp · cites it 15× “For example, R.C. 2151.412 requires the agency to prepare and maintain a case plan for children in temporary custody with the goal ‘to eliminate with all due speed the need for the out-of-home placement so that the child can safely return home.”
In re D.M. (2020) ohioctapp · cites it 6× “See R.C. 2151.412; In re S.D-M., 9th Dist. Summit No.”
In Re Hiatt (1993) ohioctapp · cites it 7× “Appellant initially argues that the trial court failed to properly apply R.C. 2151.412(G), which provides: “(G) In the agency’s development of a case plan and the court’s review' of the case plan, the agency and the court shall be guided by the following general priorities: “(1)…”
In Re Awkal (1994) ohioctapp · cites it 4× “412(G)(2) and R.C. 2151.412(D)(5).” The facts that are relevant to the issues raised in this appeal are as follows.”
In re S.D-M. (2014) ohioctapp · cites it 12× “See R.C. 2151.412. Because the journalized case plan binds “[a]ll parties,” the terms of the case plan bind not only the parents, but also the state.”
In re L.W. (2017) ohioctapp · cites it 3× “was a “suitable” relative pursuant to R.C. 2151.412(H)(2)1 before granting permanent custody to CCDCFS.”
Ward v. Summa Health System (2010) ohio · cites it 4× “{¶ g} “(b) In any civil action concerning court-ordered treatment or services received by a patient, if the court-ordered treatment or services were ordered as part of a case plan journalized under section 2151.412 of the Revised Code or the court-ordered treatment or services…”
In Re Smith (1991) ohioctapp · cites it 3× “The trial court committed reversible error in failing to dismiss the complaint requesting permanent custody of the Smith children in violation of § 2151.412 of the Ohio Rev.Code. This statute requires termination of temporary custody of public children service agencies which…”
In re K.J. (2021) ohioctapp · cites it 6× “R.C. 2151.412, which addresses case plans, further directs the director of job and family services to adopt rules regarding the content, format, development, implementation, and 7 modification of case plans.”
In Re Smart (1984) ohioctapp · cites it 10× “353(A)(2) or (3), a comprehensive reunification plan is required by R.C. 2151.412. And the court will make a determination to see whether there has been a good faith effort to implement the reunification plan if the agency moves to change the order of temporary custody to…”
In re I.H. (2020) ohioctapp · cites it 4× “Appellee reinstated supervised visitations because during the period of the unsupervised visits, I.”
Elmer v. Lucas County Children Services Board (1987) ohioctapp · cites it 6× “2d 257 , paragraph two of the syllabus, where it was held that “R.C. 2151.412 does not require a juvenile court to order a reunification plan when it makes a dispositional order pursuant to R.”
Show all 298 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(1) — 1 case
In re T.R. (2008) ohio
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(A) — 13 cases
In re K.J. (2021) ohioctapp “R.C. 2151.412, which addresses case plans, further directs the director of job and family services to adopt rules regarding the content, format, development, implementation, and 7 modification of case plans.”
In re Baby Girl Baxter (1985) ohio
In re D.M. (2020) ohioctapp “See R.C. 2151.412; In re S.D-M., 9th Dist. Summit No.”
In re S.H. (2020) ohioctapp
In Re Lucas (1985) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(A)(1) — 7 cases
In re A.D. (2023) ohioctapp
In re S.R. (2014) ohioctapp
In re C.W. (2010) ohioctapp
In re E.C. (2022) ohioctapp
In re J.H. (2019) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(A)(2) — 8 cases
Abdulsalaam v. Franklin County Board of Commissioners (2009) ohsd
In Re Brown (2001) ohioctapp
In re T.R. (2008) ohio
In re L.F. (2021) ohioctapp
In re M.O. (2011) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(A)(3) — 1 case
In re M.B. (2019) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(B) — 1 case
In Re Pachin (1988) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(B)(1) — 1 case
In Re Smith (1982) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(B)(1)(b)(i) — 1 case
In Re Jones (1985) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(C) — 8 cases
In re C.W. (2010) ohioctapp
In Re Vickers Children (1983) ohioctapp
In Re Patterson (1984) ohioctapp
In Re Lucas (1985) ohioctapp
In Re Smith (1982) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(C)(1) — 4 cases
In re S.R. (2014) ohioctapp
In re J.H. (2019) ohioctapp
In re T.Z. (2017) ohioctapp
In re A.L. (2020) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(D) — 17 cases
Pittman v. Cuyahoga County Department of Children & Family Services (2011) ca6
In re Murray (1990) ohio
In re I.K.-W. (2019) ohioctapp
In re P.C. (2021) ohioctapp
In re Y.R. (2021) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(D)(4) — 1 case
In Re Jones (1985) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(D)(5) — 1 case
In Re Awkal (1994) ohioctapp “412(G)(2) and R.C. 2151.412(D)(5).” The facts that are relevant to the issues raised in this appeal are as follows.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(E) — 18 cases
In re J.H. (2016) ohioctapp
In re S.H. (2020) ohioctapp
In re I.H. (2020) ohioctapp “Appellee reinstated supervised visitations because during the period of the unsupervised visits, I.”
In re I.K.-W. (2019) ohioctapp
In re N.R. (2021) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(E)(1) — 3 cases
In Re Moore (2003) ohioctapp
Spears v. Bush (2010) ohioctapp
Matter of Nowak (1999) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(F) — 1 case
Spears v. Bush (2010) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(F)(1) — 17 cases
In re D.M. (2020) ohioctapp “See R.C. 2151.412; In re S.D-M., 9th Dist. Summit No.”
In re C.C. (2010) ohioctapp
In re I.H. (2020) ohioctapp “Appellee reinstated supervised visitations because during the period of the unsupervised visits, I.”
In re I.K.-W. (2019) ohioctapp
In re M.B. (2023) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(F)(1)(a) — 1 case
In re J.R. (2009) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(F)(1)(b) — 3 cases
In re James (2007) ohio
In Re Nevaeh J., Unpublished Decision (12-15-2006) (2006) ohioctapp
In Re Moore (2003) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(F)(1)(b)(ii) — 1 case
In re Young Children (1996) ohio
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(F)(2) — 31 cases
In re X.S. (2021) ohioctapp
In re D.M. (2020) ohioctapp “See R.C. 2151.412; In re S.D-M., 9th Dist. Summit No.”
In re J.H. (2016) ohioctapp
In re I.H. (2020) ohioctapp “Appellee reinstated supervised visitations because during the period of the unsupervised visits, I.”
In re S.D-M. (2014) ohioctapp “See R.C. 2151.412. Because the journalized case plan binds “[a]ll parties,” the terms of the case plan bind not only the parents, but also the state.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(F)(2)(a) — 5 cases
In re S.D-M. (2014) ohioctapp “See R.C. 2151.412. Because the journalized case plan binds “[a]ll parties,” the terms of the case plan bind not only the parents, but also the state.”
In re X.S. (2021) ohioctapp
In re M.B. (2019) ohioctapp
In re N.F. (2018) ohioctapp
In re K.T. (2022) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(F)(2)(b) — 10 cases
In re D.T. (2021) ohioctapp
In re L.A. (2023) ohioctapp
In re S.D-M. (2014) ohioctapp “See R.C. 2151.412. Because the journalized case plan binds “[a]ll parties,” the terms of the case plan bind not only the parents, but also the state.”
In re X.S. (2021) ohioctapp
In re L.P. (2021) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(F)(3) — 2 cases
In re S.D-M. (2014) ohioctapp “See R.C. 2151.412. Because the journalized case plan binds “[a]ll parties,” the terms of the case plan bind not only the parents, but also the state.”
In re A.M. (2017) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(F)(3)(a) — 1 case
In re S.D-M. (2014) ohioctapp “See R.C. 2151.412. Because the journalized case plan binds “[a]ll parties,” the terms of the case plan bind not only the parents, but also the state.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(F)(l)(b)(ii) — 1 case
In re Young Children (1996) ohio
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(G) — 21 cases
In Re Hiatt (1993) ohioctapp “Appellant initially argues that the trial court failed to properly apply R.C. 2151.412(G), which provides: “(G) In the agency’s development of a case plan and the court’s review' of the case plan, the agency and the court shall be guided by the following general priorities: “(1)…”
In Re Awkal (1994) ohioctapp “412(G)(2) and R.C. 2151.412(D)(5).” The facts that are relevant to the issues raised in this appeal are as follows.”
In re C.H. (2016) ohioctapp
In re A.F. (2021) ohioctapp
In re S.R. (2014) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(G)(1) — 4 cases
In re L.H. (2024) ohioctapp
In re I.N. (2024) ohioctapp
In re L.D. (2025) ohioctapp
In re A.H. (2025) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(G)(1)(b) — 1 case
In re E.C. (2022) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(G)(2) — 5 cases
In re M.O. (2011) ohioctapp
In Re Awkal (1994) ohioctapp “412(G)(2) and R.C. 2151.412(D)(5).” The facts that are relevant to the issues raised in this appeal are as follows.”
In re G.M. (2011) ohioctapp
In Re Z.Y., Unpublished Decision (1-19-2006) (2006) ohioctapp
In re M.H. (2011) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(H) — 10 cases
In re K.B. (2024) ohioctapp “For example, R.C. 2151.412 requires the agency to prepare and maintain a case plan for children in temporary custody with the goal ‘to eliminate with all due speed the need for the out-of-home placement so that the child can safely return home.”
In re D.B. (2024) ohioctapp
In re W.H. (2016) ohioctapp
In re J.R. (2016) ohioctapp
In re M.A.P. (2013) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(H)(1) — 3 cases
In re W.H. (2016) ohioctapp
In re M.G. (2023) ohioctapp
In re C.C (2016) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(H)(2) — 16 cases
In re L.W. (2017) ohioctapp “was a “suitable” relative pursuant to R.C. 2151.412(H)(2)1 before granting permanent custody to CCDCFS.”
In re K.B. (2024) ohioctapp “For example, R.C. 2151.412 requires the agency to prepare and maintain a case plan for children in temporary custody with the goal ‘to eliminate with all due speed the need for the out-of-home placement so that the child can safely return home.”
In re D.B. (2024) ohioctapp
In re M.B. (2017) ohioctapp
In re Tr.T. (2018) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(H)(3) — 1 case
In re P.G. (2016) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(H)(5) — 1 case
In re C.S. (2021) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(J) — 1 case
In re A.C. (2022) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(c) — 1 case
In Re Snider (1984) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.412(h) — 1 case
In re K.B. (2024) ohioctapp “For example, R.C. 2151.412 requires the agency to prepare and maintain a case plan for children in temporary custody with the goal ‘to eliminate with all due speed the need for the out-of-home placement so that the child can safely return home.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.