Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2152 - Ohio Revised Code | Ohio Laws

Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.84

Hearing to review effectiveness of disposition and of any treatment

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
January 1, 2008
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 10 - 127th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A)(1) When a juvenile court judge issues an order under section 2152.82 or division (A) or (B) of section 2152.83 of the Revised Code that classifies a delinquent child a juvenile offender registrant and specifies that the child has a duty to comply with sections 2950.04, 2950.041, 2950.05, and 2950.06 of the Revised Code, upon completion of the disposition of that child made for the sexually oriented offense or the child-victim oriented offense on which the juvenile offender registrant order was based, the judge or the judge's successor in office shall conduct a hearing to review the effectiveness of the disposition and of any treatment provided for the child, to determine the risks that the child might re-offend, to determine whether the prior classification of the child as a juvenile offender registrant should be continued or terminated as provided under division (A)(2) of this section, and to determine whether its prior determination made at the hearing held pursuant to section 2152.831 of the Revised Code as to whether the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender should be continued or modified as provided under division (A)(2) of this section.

(2) Upon completion of a hearing under division (A)(1) of this section, the judge, in the judge's discretion and after consideration of all relevant factors, including but not limited to, the factors listed in division (D) of section 2152.83 of the Revised Code, shall do one of the following as applicable:

(a) Enter an order that continues the classification of the delinquent child as a juvenile offender registrant made in the prior order issued under section 2152.82 or division (A) or (B) of section 2152.83 of the Revised Code and the prior determination included in the order that the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender, whichever is applicable;

(b) If the prior order was issued under division (B) of section 2152.83 of the Revised Code, enter an order that contains a determination that the delinquent child no longer is a juvenile offender registrant and no longer has a duty to comply with sections 2950.04, 2950.041, 2950.05, and 2950.06 of the Revised Code. An order issued under division (A)(2)(b) of this section also terminates all prior determinations that the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender, whichever is applicable. Division (A)(2)(b) of this section does not apply to a prior order issued under section 2152.82 or division (A) of section 2152.83 of the Revised Code.

(c) If the prior order was issued under section 2152.82 or division (A) or (B) of section 2152.83 of the Revised Code, enter an order that continues the classification of the delinquent child as a juvenile offender registrant made in the prior order issued under section 2152.82 or division (A) or (B) of section 2152.83 of the Revised Code, and that modifies the prior determination made at the hearing held pursuant to section 2152.831 of the Revised Code that the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender, whichever is applicable. An order issued under division (A)(2)(c) of this section shall not include a determination that increases to a higher tier the tier classification of the delinquent child. An order issued under division (A)(2)(c) of this section shall specify the new determination made by the court at a hearing held pursuant to division (A)(1) of this section as to whether the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender, whichever is applicable.

(B)(1) If a judge issues an order under division (A)(2)(a) of this section that continues the prior classification of the delinquent child as a juvenile offender registrant and the prior determination included in the order that the child is a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender, a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender, or a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender, whichever is applicable, the prior classification and the prior determination shall remain in effect.

(2) A judge may issue an order under division (A)(2)(c) of this section that contains a determination that reclassifies a child from a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender classification to a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender classification or to a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender classification.

A judge may issue an order under division (A)(2)(c) of this section that contains a determination that reclassifies a child from a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender classification. A judge may not issue an order under that division that contains a determination that reclassifies a child from a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender classification to a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender classification.

A judge may not issue an order under division (A)(2)(c) of this section that contains a determination that reclassifies a child from a tier I sex offender/child-victim offender classification to a tier II sex offender/child-victim offender classification or to a tier III sex offender/child-victim offender classification.

If a judge issues an order under this division that contains a determination that reclassifies a child, the judge shall provide a copy of the order to the delinquent child and the bureau of criminal identification and investigation, and the bureau, upon receipt of the copy of the order, promptly shall notify the sheriff with whom the child most recently registered under section 2950.04 or 2950.041 of the Revised Code of the determination and reclassification.

(3) If a judge issues an order under division (A)(2)(b) of this section that declassifies the delinquent child as a juvenile offender registrant, the judge shall provide a copy of the order to the bureau of criminal identification and investigation, and the bureau, upon receipt of the copy of the order, promptly shall notify the sheriff with whom the child most recently registered under section 2950.04 or 2950.041 of the Revised Code of the declassification.

(C) If a judge issues an order under division (A)(2)(a), (b), or (c) of this section, the judge shall provide to the delinquent child and to the delinquent child's parent, guardian, or custodian a copy of the order and, if applicable, a notice containing the information described in divisions (A) and (B) of section 2950.03 of the Revised Code. The judge shall provide the notice at the time of the issuance of the order and shall comply with divisions (B) and (C) of that section regarding that notice and the provision of it.

(D) An order issued under division (A)(2)(a) or (c) of this section and any determinations included in the order shall remain in effect for the period of time specified in section 2950.07 of the Revised Code, subject to a modification or termination of the order under section 2152.85 of the Revised Code, and section 2152.851 of the Revised Code applies regarding the order and the determinations. If an order is issued under division (A)(2)(a) or (c) of this section, the child's attainment of eighteen or twenty-one years of age does not affect or terminate the order, and the order remains in effect for the period of time described in this division.

(E) The provisions of this section do not apply to a delinquent child who is classified as both a juvenile offender registrant and a public registry-qualified juvenile offender registrant pursuant to section 2152.86 of the Revised Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44 cases (18 in the last 5 years), 2009–2026 · leading case: In re R.B. (Slip Opinion)
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re R.B. (Slip Opinion) (2020) ohio · cites it 30× “] Juvenile law—Sex-offender-classification hearing—A juvenile court does not lose jurisdiction to enter an order pursuant to R.C. 2152.84 once the juvenile reaches the age of 21—While a juvenile court’s failure to hold a hearing in compliance with R.”
In re D.R. (2022) ohio · cites it 31× “The First District Court of Appeals followed this instruction when it found R.C. 2152.84 unconstitutional as applied to appellee, D.”
In re D.R. (2021) ohioctapp · cites it 12× “’s Tier I classification and remand this cause for a new completion-of-disposition hearing under R.C. 2152.84, during which the juvenile court may exercise its discretion to continue D.”
State v. Amos (2017) ohioctapp · cites it 16× “The court’s entry stated, “Upon completion of the dispositions that were made for the sexually oriented offense upon which the order is based, a hearing will be conducted, and the order and any determinations included in the order are subject to modification or termination…”
In Re D.S. (2016) ohio · cites it 4× “Under R.C. 2152.84(A)(1), when a child is classified as a juvenile-offender registrant before the completion of disposition for the sexually oriented offense, the juvenile court judge “shall conduct a hearing” upon the completion of the child’s disposition “to determine whether…”
In re Z.M. (2022) ohioctapp · cites it 13× “The trial court did not, however, hold a completion-of-disposition hearing as required by R.C. 2152.84. On August 3, 2020, Z.”
In re C.P. (2012) ohio · cites it 2× “R.C. 2152.84(A)(1). Additionally, a JOR may file a petition for reclassification three years after the court issues its order pursuant to that mandatory hearing, a second petition three years later, and further petitions every five years thereafter.”
In re K.K. (2022) ohio · cites it 2× “This court held that a provision of R.C. 2152.84 that sets the time for holding a review hearing when a juvenile completes his disposition, is mandatory 29 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO based upon the use of “shall” in the statute but nevertheless found that the provision is not…”
In Re I.A. (2014) ohio · cites it 2× “{¶ 17} Under R.C. 2152.84(A), any child classified as a juvenile-offender registrant pursuant to R.”
In re Antwon C. (2009) ohioctapp · cites it 2× “Second, under R.C. 2152.84, when a child completes all aspects of the disposition, including probation and any ordered treatment, the trial court “shall conduct a hearing” to consider the risk of reoffending so that the trial court can determine whether the order to register as…”
In re Raheem L. (2013) ohioctapp · cites it 2× “See R.C. 2152.84 and 2152.85. Given the length of his 2 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS suspended commitment, his first opportunity for declassification will, therefore, occur when he is approximately 24 years old.”
In re M.I. (2017) ohioctapp · cites it 2× “R.C. 2152.84(A)(2)(c). Nor may the court increase the classification.”
Show all 44 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.84(A) — 6 cases
In Re I.A. (2014) ohio “{¶ 17} Under R.C. 2152.84(A), any child classified as a juvenile-offender registrant pursuant to R.”
State v. Amos (2017) ohioctapp “The court’s entry stated, “Upon completion of the dispositions that were made for the sexually oriented offense upon which the order is based, a hearing will be conducted, and the order and any determinations included in the order are subject to modification or termination…”
In re T.U. (2016) ohioctapp
In re A.J. (2022) ohioctapp
In re D.F. (2022) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.84(A)(1) — 21 cases
In Re D.S. (2016) ohio “Under R.C. 2152.84(A)(1), when a child is classified as a juvenile-offender registrant before the completion of disposition for the sexually oriented offense, the juvenile court judge “shall conduct a hearing” upon the completion of the child’s disposition “to determine whether…”
In re R.B. (Slip Opinion) (2020) ohio “] Juvenile law—Sex-offender-classification hearing—A juvenile court does not lose jurisdiction to enter an order pursuant to R.C. 2152.84 once the juvenile reaches the age of 21—While a juvenile court’s failure to hold a hearing in compliance with R.”
In re C.P. (2012) ohio “R.C. 2152.84(A)(1). Additionally, a JOR may file a petition for reclassification three years after the court issues its order pursuant to that mandatory hearing, a second petition three years later, and further petitions every five years thereafter.”
In re D.R. (2021) ohioctapp “’s Tier I classification and remand this cause for a new completion-of-disposition hearing under R.C. 2152.84, during which the juvenile court may exercise its discretion to continue D.”
In re D.R. (2022) ohio “The First District Court of Appeals followed this instruction when it found R.C. 2152.84 unconstitutional as applied to appellee, D.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.84(A)(2) — 9 cases
In re D.R. (2022) ohio “The First District Court of Appeals followed this instruction when it found R.C. 2152.84 unconstitutional as applied to appellee, D.”
In re R.B. (Slip Opinion) (2020) ohio “] Juvenile law—Sex-offender-classification hearing—A juvenile court does not lose jurisdiction to enter an order pursuant to R.C. 2152.84 once the juvenile reaches the age of 21—While a juvenile court’s failure to hold a hearing in compliance with R.”
In re D.R. (2021) ohioctapp “’s Tier I classification and remand this cause for a new completion-of-disposition hearing under R.C. 2152.84, during which the juvenile court may exercise its discretion to continue D.”
In re Z.M. (2022) ohioctapp “The trial court did not, however, hold a completion-of-disposition hearing as required by R.C. 2152.84. On August 3, 2020, Z.”
In re Raheem L. (2013) ohioctapp “See R.C. 2152.84 and 2152.85. Given the length of his 2 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS suspended commitment, his first opportunity for declassification will, therefore, occur when he is approximately 24 years old.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.84(A)(2)(a) — 4 cases
In re D.R. (2021) ohioctapp “’s Tier I classification and remand this cause for a new completion-of-disposition hearing under R.C. 2152.84, during which the juvenile court may exercise its discretion to continue D.”
In re N.D. (2021) ohioctapp
In re N.D. (2021) ohioctapp
In re D.F. (2022) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.84(A)(2)(b) — 6 cases
In re D.R. (2022) ohio “The First District Court of Appeals followed this instruction when it found R.C. 2152.84 unconstitutional as applied to appellee, D.”
In re N.Z. (2014) ohioctapp
In re C.R. (2014) ohioctapp
In re J.O. (2014) ohioctapp
In re B.W. (2025) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.84(A)(2)(c) — 3 cases
In re M.I. (2017) ohioctapp “R.C. 2152.84(A)(2)(c). Nor may the court increase the classification.”
In re N.D. (2021) ohioctapp
In re N.D. (2021) ohioctapp
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.84(B)(2) — 2 cases
In re D.R. (2021) ohioctapp “’s Tier I classification and remand this cause for a new completion-of-disposition hearing under R.C. 2152.84, during which the juvenile court may exercise its discretion to continue D.”
In re M.I. (2017) ohioctapp “R.C. 2152.84(A)(2)(c). Nor may the court increase the classification.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.84(C) — 1 case
State v. Amos (2017) ohioctapp “The court’s entry stated, “Upon completion of the dispositions that were made for the sexually oriented offense upon which the order is based, a hearing will be conducted, and the order and any determinations included in the order are subject to modification or termination…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2152.84(D) — 2 cases
In re Q.J. (2012) ohioctapp
In re M.B.E. (2025) ohioctapp
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.