Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2743 - Ohio Revised Code | Ohio Laws
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75 (2026)

Jurisdiction over claims alleging denial of access to public records

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 354 cases (265 in the last 5 years), 2017–2026 · leading case: Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). · cites it 43× “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
Hurt v. Liberty Twp., 2017 Ohio 7820 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 9× “{¶ 14} On November 21, 2016, Requesters filed a complaint against the Township under R.C. 2743.75 alleging denial of access to a public record in violation of R.”
Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 2185 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024). · cites it 15× “{¶12} Cases brought under R.C. 2743.75 are controlled by the same principles as mandamus actions.”
Doe v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 5891 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 25× “{¶ 9} On July 25, 2023, Doe filed a complaint in the Court of Claims against Ohio State pursuant to R.C. 2743.75. The complaint alleged that Ohio State had denied Doe access to public records in violation of R.”
Grant v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2022 Ohio 1619 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2022). · cites it 22× “) The Special Master also states: On review, the special master concludes that resolution of this dispute is unlikely to be expeditiously litigated under the procedures available in R.C. 2743.75. The public records law sophistication of the parties suggests that mediation is…”
Anthony v. Columbus City Schs., 2021 Ohio 3241 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2021). · cites it 18× “03(D) (providing that the “Rules of Civil Procedure shall govern practice and procedure in all actions in the court of claims, except insofar as inconsistent with this chapter”).”
Matis v. Toledo Police Dept., 2023 Ohio 4878 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023). · cites it 12× “75(A) (R.C. 2743.75 proceedings are intended to provide “an expeditious *** procedure *** to resolve disputes alleging a denial of access to public records”).”
Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 2625 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024). · cites it 12× “If, as a matter of course, the Court were to permit additional motion practice after the issuance of a report and recommendation, this would delay the adjudication of public-records disputes that are brought in this forum under R.C. 2743.75, thereby frustrating the expeditious…”
Viola v. Ohio Atty. Gen., Pub. Record Unit, 2021 Ohio 3828 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 15× “{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Anthony Viola, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims of Ohio adopting a special master's report and recommendation in favor of defendant-appellee, the Ohio Attorney General's Office, Public Records Unit, on appellant's public-records dispute…”
Meros v. Off. of Ohio Atty. Gen. Yost, 2023 Ohio 1861 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023). · cites it 35× “2023-00146PQ -2- DECISION AND ENTRY {¶4} Requester essentially maintains in his objections that the Special Master prejudicially erred because the Special Master failed to refer this case to mediation and because he failed to contact Requester before recommending dismissal of…”
Hicks v. Union Twp., 2023 Ohio 874 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 13× “{¶1} Appellant, Christopher Richard Hicks, appeals from a decision rendered by the Court of Claims of Ohio which adopted a special master's report and recommendation in favor of appellee, the Union Township, Clermont County Board of Trustees ("the Township"), on a public-records…”
Doe v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 565 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024). · cites it 17× “In response, Requester filed a Memorandum Contra OSU’s Motion for Leave to Amend Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike said Motion for Leave, and Motion for Sanctions, to which OSU replied.”
Show all 354 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(2) — 1 case
Welsh-Huggins v. Off. of the Pros. Atty., 2019 Ohio 964 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(A) — 82 cases
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 2625 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024). “If, as a matter of course, the Court were to permit additional motion practice after the issuance of a report and recommendation, this would delay the adjudication of public-records disputes that are brought in this forum under R.C. 2743.75, thereby frustrating the expeditious…”
Grant v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2022 Ohio 1619 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2022). “) The Special Master also states: On review, the special master concludes that resolution of this dispute is unlikely to be expeditiously litigated under the procedures available in R.C. 2743.75. The public records law sophistication of the parties suggests that mediation is…”
Viola v. Ohio Atty. Gen., Pub. Record Unit, 2021 Ohio 3828 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Anthony Viola, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims of Ohio adopting a special master's report and recommendation in favor of defendant-appellee, the Ohio Attorney General's Office, Public Records Unit, on appellant's public-records dispute…”
Matis v. Toledo Police Dept., 2023 Ohio 4878 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023). “75(A) (R.C. 2743.75 proceedings are intended to provide “an expeditious *** procedure *** to resolve disputes alleging a denial of access to public records”).”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(A)(1) — 6 cases
Sell v. Trumbull Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 2023 Ohio 1174 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
Webb v. Buckeye Schs., 2024 Ohio 1267 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024).
Martin v. New Philadelphia Police Dept., 2023 Ohio 1862 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
Knapp v. Lorain Cty. Dom. Court Juv. Div., 2023 Ohio 3621 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
Sell v. Trumbull Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 2023 Ohio 627 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(B) — 1 case
Hunt Eng., L.L.C. v. Ohio Env't Prot. Agency, 2022 Ohio 3141 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(C) — 4 cases
Grant v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2022 Ohio 1619 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2022). “) The Special Master also states: On review, the special master concludes that resolution of this dispute is unlikely to be expeditiously litigated under the procedures available in R.C. 2743.75. The public records law sophistication of the parties suggests that mediation is…”
Advance Local Media, L.L.C. v. Ohio State Univ., 2022 Ohio 321 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2022).
Sandusky Register v. Cedar Point Police Dept., 2022 Ohio 1615 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2022).
Hicks v. Court of Claims, 2024 Ohio 2999 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(C)(1) — 3 cases
Hurt v. Liberty Twp., 2017 Ohio 7820 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “{¶ 14} On November 21, 2016, Requesters filed a complaint against the Township under R.C. 2743.75 alleging denial of access to a public record in violation of R.”
Bello v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2020 Ohio 4559 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2020).
Crenshaw v. E. Cleveland, 2019 Ohio 1614 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(C)(2) — 15 cases
Grant v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2022 Ohio 1619 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2022). “) The Special Master also states: On review, the special master concludes that resolution of this dispute is unlikely to be expeditiously litigated under the procedures available in R.C. 2743.75. The public records law sophistication of the parties suggests that mediation is…”
State ex rel. Sultaana v. Mansfield Corr. Inst., 2023 Ohio 1177 (Ohio 2023).
Tingler v. Ottawa Cty. Prosecutor's Off., 2017 Ohio 8451 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2017).
Meros v. Off. of Ohio Atty. Gen. Yost, 2023 Ohio 1861 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023). “2023-00146PQ -2- DECISION AND ENTRY {¶4} Requester essentially maintains in his objections that the Special Master prejudicially erred because the Special Master failed to refer this case to mediation and because he failed to contact Requester before recommending dismissal of…”
Lavar v. Accel Schs. Ohio, 2025 Ohio 3150 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(D) — 51 cases
Ryan v. Ashtabula, 2023 Ohio 621 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
Hicks v. Union Twp., 2023 Ohio 874 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “{¶1} Appellant, Christopher Richard Hicks, appeals from a decision rendered by the Court of Claims of Ohio which adopted a special master's report and recommendation in favor of appellee, the Union Township, Clermont County Board of Trustees ("the Township"), on a public-records…”
Hicks v. Union Twp. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Trs., 2024 Ohio 5449 (Ohio 2024).
Viola v. Ohio Atty. Gen., Pub. Record Unit, 2021 Ohio 3828 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Anthony Viola, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims of Ohio adopting a special master's report and recommendation in favor of defendant-appellee, the Ohio Attorney General's Office, Public Records Unit, on appellant's public-records dispute…”
Phelps v. Ohio Parole Bd., 2023 Ohio 284 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(D)(1) — 20 cases
Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 2185 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024). “{¶12} Cases brought under R.C. 2743.75 are controlled by the same principles as mandamus actions.”
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
Myers v. Paint Twp., 2024 Ohio 4784 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024).
Hunt Eng., L.L.C. v. Ohio Env't Prot. Agency, 2022 Ohio 3141 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2022).
Kovach v. Walder, 2019 Ohio 5455 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(D)(2) — 47 cases
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
Meros v. Off. of Ohio Atty. Gen. Yost, 2023 Ohio 1861 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023). “2023-00146PQ -2- DECISION AND ENTRY {¶4} Requester essentially maintains in his objections that the Special Master prejudicially erred because the Special Master failed to refer this case to mediation and because he failed to contact Requester before recommending dismissal of…”
Schaffer v. Sheets, 2025 Ohio 1007 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2025).
Grant v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2022 Ohio 1619 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2022). “) The Special Master also states: On review, the special master concludes that resolution of this dispute is unlikely to be expeditiously litigated under the procedures available in R.C. 2743.75. The public records law sophistication of the parties suggests that mediation is…”
Isreal v. Franklin Cty. Clerk, 2019 Ohio 2630 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(E) — 6 cases
Doe v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 565 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024). “In response, Requester filed a Memorandum Contra OSU’s Motion for Leave to Amend Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike said Motion for Leave, and Motion for Sanctions, to which OSU replied.”
Mentch v. Cleveland, 2021 Ohio 1567 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2021).
Sandusky Register v. Cedar Point Police Dept., 2022 Ohio 1193 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2022).
Gardner v. Mantua (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2026).
Clyde v. Mantua (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(E)(1) — 11 cases
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
Meros v. Off. of Ohio Atty. Gen. Yost, 2023 Ohio 1861 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023). “2023-00146PQ -2- DECISION AND ENTRY {¶4} Requester essentially maintains in his objections that the Special Master prejudicially erred because the Special Master failed to refer this case to mediation and because he failed to contact Requester before recommending dismissal of…”
Isreal v. Franklin Cty. Commrs., 2021 Ohio 3824 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
Parks v. Colburn, 2018 Ohio 4595 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2018).
Ferrise v. Berea City Sch. Dist., 2024 Ohio 5968 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(E)(2) — 33 cases
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
Dillingham v. Butler Cty. Prosecutor's Off., 2018 Ohio 3654 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2018).
Parks v. Colburn, 2018 Ohio 4595 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2018).
Kovach v. Walder, 2019 Ohio 5455 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2019).
Bello v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2020 Ohio 4559 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(E)(3) — 1 case
Law Off. of Josh Brown, L.L.C. v. Ohio Secy. of State, 2025 Ohio 2130 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(E)(3)(a) — 9 cases
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
Speros v. Secy. of State, 2017 Ohio 8453 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2017).
Grant v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2022 Ohio 1619 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2022). “) The Special Master also states: On review, the special master concludes that resolution of this dispute is unlikely to be expeditiously litigated under the procedures available in R.C. 2743.75. The public records law sophistication of the parties suggests that mediation is…”
Meros v. Off. of Ohio Atty. Gen. Yost, 2023 Ohio 1861 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023). “2023-00146PQ -2- DECISION AND ENTRY {¶4} Requester essentially maintains in his objections that the Special Master prejudicially erred because the Special Master failed to refer this case to mediation and because he failed to contact Requester before recommending dismissal of…”
Advance Local Media, L.L.C. v. Ohio State Univ., 2022 Ohio 321 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(E)(3)(b) — 2 cases
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
White v. Ross Corr. Inst., 2026 Ohio 1002 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(E)(3)(c) — 19 cases
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 2185 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024). “{¶12} Cases brought under R.C. 2743.75 are controlled by the same principles as mandamus actions.”
Ryan v. Ashtabula, 2023 Ohio 621 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
Schaffer v. Sheets, 2025 Ohio 1007 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2025).
Kirk v. Coshocton Cty. Sheriff's Off., 2019 Ohio 1825 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(E)(3)(e) — 1 case
Geauga Cty. Prosecutor's Off. v. Munson Fire Dept., 2023 Ohio 3958 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(F) — 53 cases
Doe v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 5891 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “{¶ 9} On July 25, 2023, Doe filed a complaint in the Court of Claims against Ohio State pursuant to R.C. 2743.75. The complaint alleged that Ohio State had denied Doe access to public records in violation of R.”
Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 2185 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024). “{¶12} Cases brought under R.C. 2743.75 are controlled by the same principles as mandamus actions.”
Matis v. Toledo Police Dept., 2023 Ohio 4878 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023). “75(A) (R.C. 2743.75 proceedings are intended to provide “an expeditious *** procedure *** to resolve disputes alleging a denial of access to public records”).”
Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 2625 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024). “If, as a matter of course, the Court were to permit additional motion practice after the issuance of a report and recommendation, this would delay the adjudication of public-records disputes that are brought in this forum under R.C. 2743.75, thereby frustrating the expeditious…”
Anthony v. Columbus City Schs., 2021 Ohio 3241 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2021). “03(D) (providing that the “Rules of Civil Procedure shall govern practice and procedure in all actions in the court of claims, except insofar as inconsistent with this chapter”).”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(F)(1) — 52 cases
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
Staton v. Timberlake, 2023 Ohio 1860 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
Speros v. Secy. of State, 2017 Ohio 8453 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2017).
Hicks v. Union Twp., 2023 Ohio 874 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “{¶1} Appellant, Christopher Richard Hicks, appeals from a decision rendered by the Court of Claims of Ohio which adopted a special master's report and recommendation in favor of appellee, the Union Township, Clermont County Board of Trustees ("the Township"), on a public-records…”
Cleveland Firefighters Assn. IAFF Local 93 v. Cleveland Dept. of Law, 2021 Ohio 3602 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(F)(2) — 285 cases
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
Anthony v. Columbus City Schs., 2021 Ohio 3241 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2021). “03(D) (providing that the “Rules of Civil Procedure shall govern practice and procedure in all actions in the court of claims, except insofar as inconsistent with this chapter”).”
Matis v. Toledo Police Dept., 2023 Ohio 4878 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023). “75(A) (R.C. 2743.75 proceedings are intended to provide “an expeditious *** procedure *** to resolve disputes alleging a denial of access to public records”).”
Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 2625 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024). “If, as a matter of course, the Court were to permit additional motion practice after the issuance of a report and recommendation, this would delay the adjudication of public-records disputes that are brought in this forum under R.C. 2743.75, thereby frustrating the expeditious…”
Geauga Cty. Pros. Off. v. Munson Fire Dept., 2023 Ohio 4437 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(F)(2)(a) — 1 case
Reigert v. State of Ohio Med. Bd., 2023 Ohio 1172 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(F)(3) — 24 cases
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
Doe v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 5891 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “{¶ 9} On July 25, 2023, Doe filed a complaint in the Court of Claims against Ohio State pursuant to R.C. 2743.75. The complaint alleged that Ohio State had denied Doe access to public records in violation of R.”
Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 2185 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024). “{¶12} Cases brought under R.C. 2743.75 are controlled by the same principles as mandamus actions.”
Ryan v. Ashtabula, 2023 Ohio 621 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
Anthony v. Columbus City Schs., 2021 Ohio 3241 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2021). “03(D) (providing that the “Rules of Civil Procedure shall govern practice and procedure in all actions in the court of claims, except insofar as inconsistent with this chapter”).”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(F)(3)(a) — 3 cases
Anthony v. Columbus City Schs., 2021 Ohio 3241 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2021). “03(D) (providing that the “Rules of Civil Procedure shall govern practice and procedure in all actions in the court of claims, except insofar as inconsistent with this chapter”).”
Fairley v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor, 2020 Ohio 1426 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2020).
Spehar v. Opportunities for Ohioans with Disabilities, 2020 Ohio 4901 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(F)(3)(b) — 51 cases
Hurt v. Liberty Twp., 2017 Ohio 7820 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “{¶ 14} On November 21, 2016, Requesters filed a complaint against the Township under R.C. 2743.75 alleging denial of access to a public record in violation of R.”
Doe v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 5891 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “{¶ 9} On July 25, 2023, Doe filed a complaint in the Court of Claims against Ohio State pursuant to R.C. 2743.75. The complaint alleged that Ohio State had denied Doe access to public records in violation of R.”
Staton v. Timberlake, 2023 Ohio 1860 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
Matis v. Toledo Police Dept., 2023 Ohio 4878 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023). “75(A) (R.C. 2743.75 proceedings are intended to provide “an expeditious *** procedure *** to resolve disputes alleging a denial of access to public records”).”
Speros v. Secy. of State, 2017 Ohio 8453 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(F)(3)(c) — 1 case
Maleky v. Ohio State Univ., Off. of Compliance & Integrity, 2026 Ohio 890 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(G) — 1 case
Viola v. Ohio Atty. Gen., Pub. Record Unit, 2021 Ohio 3828 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Anthony Viola, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims of Ohio adopting a special master's report and recommendation in favor of defendant-appellee, the Ohio Attorney General's Office, Public Records Unit, on appellant's public-records dispute…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(G)(1) — 136 cases
Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Off. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5371 (Ohio 2020). “In proceedings brought pursuant to R.C. 2743.75, the Court of Claims determined that competent evidence had not been presented to establish the security-record exemption and consequently ordered the video’s public release subject to certain redactions for undercover-officer…”
Hicks v. Union Twp., 2023 Ohio 874 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “{¶1} Appellant, Christopher Richard Hicks, appeals from a decision rendered by the Court of Claims of Ohio which adopted a special master's report and recommendation in favor of appellee, the Union Township, Clermont County Board of Trustees ("the Township"), on a public-records…”
Hicks v. Union Twp. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Trs., 2024 Ohio 5449 (Ohio 2024).
Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 2185 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2024). “{¶12} Cases brought under R.C. 2743.75 are controlled by the same principles as mandamus actions.”
Ryan v. Ashtabula, 2023 Ohio 621 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(G)(2) — 4 cases
Doe v. Ohio State Univ., 2024 Ohio 5891 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “{¶ 9} On July 25, 2023, Doe filed a complaint in the Court of Claims against Ohio State pursuant to R.C. 2743.75. The complaint alleged that Ohio State had denied Doe access to public records in violation of R.”
Cleveland Firefighters Assn. IAFF Local 93 v. Cleveland Dept. of Law, 2021 Ohio 3602 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
Smith v. OSU Off. of Univ. Compliance & Integrity, 2020 Ohio 5593 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2020).
Clyde v. Mantua (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2743.75(H) — 2 cases
Morrison v. Mt. Vernon, Saf. Serv. Dir. Off., 2025 Ohio 470 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2025).
Clyde v. Mantua (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.