Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214 (2026)

Petition for protection order in menacing by stalking cases

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) As used in this section:

(1) "Court" means the court of common pleas of the county in which the person to be protected by the protection order resides.

(2) "Victim advocate" means a person who provides support and assistance for a person who files a petition under this section.

(3) "Family or household member" means any of the following:

(a) Any of the following who is residing with or has resided with the petitioner:

(i) A spouse, a person living as a spouse, or a former spouse of the petitioner;

(ii) A parent, a foster parent, or a child of the petitioner, or another person related by consanguinity or affinity to the petitioner;

(iii) A parent or a child of a spouse, person living as a spouse, or former spouse of the petitioner, or another person related by consanguinity or affinity to a spouse, person living as a spouse, or former spouse of the petitioner.

(b) The natural parent of any child of whom the petitioner is the other natural parent or is the putative other natural parent.

(4) "Person living as a spouse" means a person who is living or has lived with the petitioner in a common law marital relationship, who otherwise is cohabiting with the petitioner, or who otherwise has cohabited with the petitioner within five years prior to the date of the alleged occurrence of the act in question.

(5) "Protection order issued by a court of another state" has the same meaning as in section 2919.27 of the Revised Code.

(6) "Sexually oriented offense" has the same meaning as in section 2950.01 of the Revised Code.

(7) "Electronic monitoring" has the same meaning as in section 2929.01 of the Revised Code.

(8) "Companion animal" has the same meaning as in section 959.131 of the Revised Code.

(B) The court has jurisdiction over all proceedings under this section.

(C) A person may seek relief under this section for the person, or any parent or adult household member may seek relief under this section on behalf of any other family or household member, by filing a petition with the court. The petition shall contain or state all of the following:

(1) An allegation that the respondent is eighteen years of age or older and engaged in a violation of section 2903.211 of the Revised Code against the person to be protected by the protection order or committed a sexually oriented offense against the person to be protected by the protection order, including a description of the nature and extent of the violation;

(2) If the petitioner seeks relief in the form of electronic monitoring of the respondent, an allegation that at any time preceding the filing of the petition the respondent engaged in conduct that would cause a reasonable person to believe that the health, welfare, or safety of the person to be protected was at risk, a description of the nature and extent of that conduct, and an allegation that the respondent presents a continuing danger to the person to be protected;

(3) A request for relief under this section.

(D)(1) If a person who files a petition pursuant to this section requests an ex parte order, the court shall hold an ex parte hearing as soon as possible after the petition is filed, but not later than the next day that the court is in session after the petition is filed. The court, for good cause shown at the ex parte hearing, may enter any temporary orders, with or without bond, that the court finds necessary for the safety and protection of the person to be protected by the order. Immediate and present danger to the person to be protected by the protection order constitutes good cause for purposes of this section. Immediate and present danger includes, but is not limited to, situations in which the respondent has threatened the person to be protected by the protection order with bodily harm or in which the respondent previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a violation of section 2903.211 of the Revised Code or a sexually oriented offense against the person to be protected by the protection order.

(2)(a) If the court, after an ex parte hearing, issues a protection order described in division (E) of this section, the court shall schedule a full hearing for a date that is within ten court days after the ex parte hearing. The court shall give the respondent notice of, and an opportunity to be heard at, the full hearing. The court shall hold the full hearing on the date scheduled under this division unless the court grants a continuance of the hearing in accordance with this division. Under any of the following circumstances or for any of the following reasons, the court may grant a continuance of the full hearing to a reasonable time determined by the court:

(i) Prior to the date scheduled for the full hearing under this division, the respondent has not been served with the petition filed pursuant to this section and notice of the full hearing.

(ii) The parties consent to the continuance.

(iii) The continuance is needed to allow a party to obtain counsel.

(iv) The continuance is needed for other good cause.

(b) An ex parte order issued under this section does not expire because of a failure to serve notice of the full hearing upon the respondent before the date set for the full hearing under division (D)(2)(a) of this section or because the court grants a continuance under that division.

(3) If a person who files a petition pursuant to this section does not request an ex parte order, or if a person requests an ex parte order but the court does not issue an ex parte order after an ex parte hearing, the court shall proceed as in a normal civil action and grant a full hearing on the matter.

(E)(1)(a) After an ex parte or full hearing, the court may issue any protection order, with or without bond, that contains terms designed to ensure the safety and protection of the person to be protected by the protection order, including, but not limited to, a requirement that the respondent refrain from entering the residence, school, business, or place of employment of the petitioner or family or household member. If the court includes a requirement that the respondent refrain from entering the residence, school, business, or place of employment of the petitioner or family or household member in the order, it also shall include in the order provisions of the type described in division (E)(5) of this section. The court may include within a protection order issued under this section a term requiring that the respondent not remove, damage, hide, harm, or dispose of any companion animal owned or possessed by the person to be protected by the order, and may include within the order a term authorizing the person to be protected by the order to remove a companion animal owned by the person to be protected by the order from the possession of the respondent.

(b) After a full hearing, if the court considering a petition that includes an allegation of the type described in division (C)(2) of this section, or the court upon its own motion, finds upon clear and convincing evidence that the petitioner reasonably believed that the respondent's conduct at any time preceding the filing of the petition endangered the health, welfare, or safety of the person to be protected and that the respondent presents a continuing danger to the person to be protected, the court may order that the respondent be electronically monitored for a period of time and under the terms and conditions that the court determines are appropriate. Electronic monitoring shall be in addition to any other relief granted to the petitioner.

(2)(a) Any protection order issued pursuant to this section shall be valid until a date certain but not later than five years from the date of its issuance.

(b) Any protection order issued pursuant to this section may be renewed in the same manner as the original order was issued.

(3) A court may not issue a protection order that requires a petitioner to do or to refrain from doing an act that the court may require a respondent to do or to refrain from doing under division (E)(1) of this section unless all of the following apply:

(a) The respondent files a separate petition for a protection order in accordance with this section.

(b) The petitioner is served with notice of the respondent's petition at least forty-eight hours before the court holds a hearing with respect to the respondent's petition, or the petitioner waives the right to receive this notice.

(c) If the petitioner has requested an ex parte order pursuant to division (D) of this section, the court does not delay any hearing required by that division beyond the time specified in that division in order to consolidate the hearing with a hearing on the petition filed by the respondent.

(d) After a full hearing at which the respondent presents evidence in support of the request for a protection order and the petitioner is afforded an opportunity to defend against that evidence, the court determines that the petitioner has committed a violation of section 2903.211 of the Revised Code against the person to be protected by the protection order issued pursuant to division (E)(3) of this section, has committed a sexually oriented offense against the person to be protected by the protection order issued pursuant to division (E)(3) of this section, or has violated a protection order issued pursuant to section 2903.213 of the Revised Code relative to the person to be protected by the protection order issued pursuant to division (E)(3) of this section.

(4) No protection order issued pursuant to this section shall in any manner affect title to any real property.

(5)(a) If the court issues a protection order under this section that includes a requirement that the alleged offender refrain from entering the residence, school, business, or place of employment of the petitioner or a family or household member, the order shall clearly state that the order cannot be waived or nullified by an invitation to the alleged offender from the complainant to enter the residence, school, business, or place of employment or by the alleged offender's entry into one of those places otherwise upon the consent of the petitioner or family or household member.

(b) Division (E)(5)(a) of this section does not limit any discretion of a court to determine that an alleged offender charged with a violation of section 2919.27 of the Revised Code, with a violation of a municipal ordinance substantially equivalent to that section, or with contempt of court, which charge is based on an alleged violation of a protection order issued under this section, did not commit the violation or was not in contempt of court.

(F)(1) The court shall cause the delivery of a copy of any protection order that is issued under this section to the petitioner, to the respondent, and to all law enforcement agencies that have jurisdiction to enforce the order. The court shall direct that a copy of the order be delivered to the respondent on the same day that the order is entered.

(2) Upon the issuance of a protection order under this section, the court shall provide the parties to the order with the following notice orally or by form:

"NOTICE

As a result of this order, it may be unlawful for you to possess or purchase a firearm, including a rifle, pistol, or revolver, or ammunition pursuant to federal law under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) for the duration of this order. If you have any questions whether this law makes it illegal for you to possess or purchase a firearm or ammunition, you should consult an attorney."

(3) All law enforcement agencies shall establish and maintain an index for the protection orders delivered to the agencies pursuant to division (F)(1) of this section. With respect to each order delivered, each agency shall note on the index the date and time that it received the order.

(4) Regardless of whether the petitioner has registered the protection order in the county in which the officer's agency has jurisdiction pursuant to division (M) of this section, any officer of a law enforcement agency shall enforce a protection order issued pursuant to this section by any court in this state in accordance with the provisions of the order, including removing the respondent from the premises, if appropriate.

(G)(1) Any proceeding under this section shall be conducted in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure, except that a protection order may be obtained under this section with or without bond. An order issued under this section, other than an ex parte order, that grants a protection order, or that refuses to grant a protection order, is a final, appealable order. The remedies and procedures provided in this section are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other available civil or criminal remedies.

(2) If as provided in division (G)(1) of this section an order issued under this section, other than an ex parte order, refuses to grant a protection order, the court, on its own motion, shall order that the ex parte order issued under this section and all of the records pertaining to that ex parte order be sealed after either of the following occurs:

(a) No party has exercised the right to appeal pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

(b) All appellate rights have been exhausted.

(H) The filing of proceedings under this section does not excuse a person from filing any report or giving any notice required by section 2151.421 of the Revised Code or by any other law.

(I) Any law enforcement agency that investigates an alleged violation of section 2903.211 of the Revised Code or an alleged commission of a sexually oriented offense shall provide information to the victim and the family or household members of the victim regarding the relief available under this section and section 2903.213 of the Revised Code.

(J)(1) Subject to division (J)(2) of this section and regardless of whether a protection order is issued or a consent agreement is approved by a court of another county or by a court of another state, no court or unit of state or local government shall charge the petitioner any fee, cost, deposit, or money in connection with the filing of a petition pursuant to this section, in connection with the filing, issuance, registration, modification, enforcement, dismissal, withdrawal, or service of a protection order, consent agreement, or witness subpoena or for obtaining a certified copy of a protection order or consent agreement.

(2) Regardless of whether a protection order is issued or a consent agreement is approved pursuant to this section, the court may assess costs against the respondent in connection with the filing, issuance, registration, modification, enforcement, dismissal, withdrawal, or service of a protection order, consent agreement, or witness subpoena or for obtaining a certified copy of a protection order or consent agreement.

(K)(1) A person who violates a protection order issued under this section is subject to the following sanctions:

(a) Criminal prosecution for a violation of section 2919.27 of the Revised Code, if the violation of the protection order constitutes a violation of that section;

(b) Punishment for contempt of court.

(2) The punishment of a person for contempt of court for violation of a protection order issued under this section does not bar criminal prosecution of the person for a violation of section 2919.27 of the Revised Code. However, a person punished for contempt of court is entitled to credit for the punishment imposed upon conviction of a violation of that section, and a person convicted of a violation of that section shall not subsequently be punished for contempt of court arising out of the same activity.

(L) In all stages of a proceeding under this section, a petitioner may be accompanied by a victim advocate.

(M)(1) A petitioner who obtains a protection order under this section or a protection order under section 2903.213 of the Revised Code may provide notice of the issuance or approval of the order to the judicial and law enforcement officials in any county other than the county in which the order is issued by registering that order in the other county pursuant to division (M)(2) of this section and filing a copy of the registered order with a law enforcement agency in the other county in accordance with that division. A person who obtains a protection order issued by a court of another state may provide notice of the issuance of the order to the judicial and law enforcement officials in any county of this state by registering the order in that county pursuant to section 2919.272 of the Revised Code and filing a copy of the registered order with a law enforcement agency in that county.

(2) A petitioner may register a protection order issued pursuant to this section or section 2903.213 of the Revised Code in a county other than the county in which the court that issued the order is located in the following manner:

(a) The petitioner shall obtain a certified copy of the order from the clerk of the court that issued the order and present that certified copy to the clerk of the court of common pleas or the clerk of a municipal court or county court in the county in which the order is to be registered.

(b) Upon accepting the certified copy of the order for registration, the clerk of the court of common pleas, municipal court, or county court shall place an endorsement of registration on the order and give the petitioner a copy of the order that bears that proof of registration.

(3) The clerk of each court of common pleas, municipal court, or county court shall maintain a registry of certified copies of protection orders that have been issued by courts in other counties pursuant to this section or section 2903.213 of the Revised Code and that have been registered with the clerk.

(N) If the court orders electronic monitoring of the respondent under this section, the court shall direct the sheriff's office or any other appropriate law enforcement agency to install the electronic monitoring device and to monitor the respondent. Unless the court determines that the respondent is indigent, the court shall order the respondent to pay the cost of the installation and monitoring of the electronic monitoring device.

Last updated March 2, 2023 at 12:56 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 247 cases (102 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: State v. Smith, 2013 Ohio 1698 (Ohio 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Smith, 2013 Ohio 1698 (Ohio 2013). · cites it 70× “On April 12, 2010, Pickens filed a petition in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, pursuant to R.C. 2903.214,1 for an ex parte SSOOPO against Smith.”
Bey v. Rasawehr (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3301 (Ohio 2020). · cites it 12× “] First Amendment—Prior restraints—R.C. 2903.214—Civil-stalking protection order enjoining future Internet postings about a person imposes an unconstitutional prior restraint on protected speech in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution—Court of…”
Curry v. Bettison, 2023 Ohio 1911 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 20× “Discussion {¶ 9} Under R.C. 2903.214, persons are allowed to seek protection orders against any person who is over the age of 18 and has engaged in a violation of R.”
J.S. v. D.E., 2017 Ohio 7507 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 5× “The civil stalking protection order was issued under R.C. 2903.214, which cites R.C. 3113.31 for the definition of family or household member.”
Baldwin v. Buckles, 2020 Ohio 2759 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 43× “{¶ 2} On December 17, 2018, petitioner-appellee Angela Baldwin sought an ex parte civil stalking protection order (“CSPO” or “SCPO”) against respondent-appellant Kobi Buckles pursuant to R.C. 2903.214. Appellee is the minor victim’s custodial grandmother.”
Danison v. Blinco, 2019 Ohio 2767 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 5× “{¶2} On September 25, 2018, Danison filed a petition for an ex parte CSPO under R.C. 2903.214. (Doc. No. 1). The trial court granted Danison’s ex parte petition on September 26, 2018.”
Tucker v. Uhl, 2023 Ohio 3680 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 15× “{¶ 15} R.C. 2903.214 governs both civil stalking and sexually oriented offense protection orders.”
T.O. v. T.G., 2024 Ohio 4510 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 36× “filed a petition for a sexually oriented offense civil protection order pursuant to R.C. 2903.214. As part of her petition, T.”
Cyran v. Cyran (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 24 (Ohio 2018). · cites it 2× “An SCPO is granted pursuant to R.C. 2903.214, and the underlying allegation in the petition must be that the respondent has engaged in a violation of R.”
Mather v. Hilfinger, 2021 Ohio 2812 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 9× “{¶ 1} Appellant, Shauna Wang Walker Hilfinger, appeals the decision of the Warren County Court of Common Pleas granting appellee, Kelly Mather, a civil stalking protection order against her in accordance with R.C. 2903.214(C)(1). For the reasons outlined below, we affirm the…”
Moyer v. Robinson, 2023 Ohio 764 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 10× “Moyer filed a pro se petition in the Lake County Court of Common Pleas requesting a CSPO pursuant to R.C. 2903.214 in favor of herself and her children.”
Harris v. Miami Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 827 N.E.2d 807 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 16× “This temporary restraining order, pursuant to R.C. 2903.214, was eventually dismissed when the court entered an order pursuant'to a consent agreement on December 4, 2000.”
Show all 247 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(A)(1) — 7 cases
M.W. v. D.M., 2018 Ohio 392 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
W.E. v. C.E., 2019 Ohio 4818 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Harris v. Miami Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 827 N.E.2d 807 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). “This temporary restraining order, pursuant to R.C. 2903.214, was eventually dismissed when the court entered an order pursuant'to a consent agreement on December 4, 2000.”
Baldwin v. Buckles, 2020 Ohio 2759 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “{¶ 2} On December 17, 2018, petitioner-appellee Angela Baldwin sought an ex parte civil stalking protection order (“CSPO” or “SCPO”) against respondent-appellant Kobi Buckles pursuant to R.C. 2903.214. Appellee is the minor victim’s custodial grandmother.”
Hayberg v. Tamburello, 2013 Ohio 3451 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(A)(3) — 3 cases
J.S. v. D.E., 2017 Ohio 7507 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “The civil stalking protection order was issued under R.C. 2903.214, which cites R.C. 3113.31 for the definition of family or household member.”
Baldwin v. Buckles, 2020 Ohio 2759 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “{¶ 2} On December 17, 2018, petitioner-appellee Angela Baldwin sought an ex parte civil stalking protection order (“CSPO” or “SCPO”) against respondent-appellant Kobi Buckles pursuant to R.C. 2903.214. Appellee is the minor victim’s custodial grandmother.”
Griga v. DiBenedetto, 2012 Ohio 6097 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(A)(5) — 1 case
Spahr v. Martin, 2019 Ohio 962 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(A)(6) — 1 case
Tucker v. Uhl, 2023 Ohio 3680 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “{¶ 15} R.C. 2903.214 governs both civil stalking and sexually oriented offense protection orders.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(B) — 4 cases
W.E. v. C.E., 2019 Ohio 4818 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Baldwin v. Buckles, 2020 Ohio 2759 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “{¶ 2} On December 17, 2018, petitioner-appellee Angela Baldwin sought an ex parte civil stalking protection order (“CSPO” or “SCPO”) against respondent-appellant Kobi Buckles pursuant to R.C. 2903.214. Appellee is the minor victim’s custodial grandmother.”
Zielinski-Barnwell v. Prewitt, 2014 Ohio 3761 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
Hayberg v. Tamburello, 2013 Ohio 3451 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(C) — 31 cases
T.O. v. T.G., 2024 Ohio 4510 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “filed a petition for a sexually oriented offense civil protection order pursuant to R.C. 2903.214. As part of her petition, T.”
J.S. v. D.E., 2017 Ohio 7507 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “The civil stalking protection order was issued under R.C. 2903.214, which cites R.C. 3113.31 for the definition of family or household member.”
Baldwin v. Buckles, 2020 Ohio 2759 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “{¶ 2} On December 17, 2018, petitioner-appellee Angela Baldwin sought an ex parte civil stalking protection order (“CSPO” or “SCPO”) against respondent-appellant Kobi Buckles pursuant to R.C. 2903.214. Appellee is the minor victim’s custodial grandmother.”
Bey v. Rasawehr (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3301 (Ohio 2020). “] First Amendment—Prior restraints—R.C. 2903.214—Civil-stalking protection order enjoining future Internet postings about a person imposes an unconstitutional prior restraint on protected speech in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution—Court of…”
Fondessy v. Simon (Slip Opinion), 2014 Ohio 4638 (Ohio 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(C)(1) — 45 cases
Mather v. Hilfinger, 2021 Ohio 2812 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “{¶ 1} Appellant, Shauna Wang Walker Hilfinger, appeals the decision of the Warren County Court of Common Pleas granting appellee, Kelly Mather, a civil stalking protection order against her in accordance with R.C. 2903.214(C)(1). For the reasons outlined below, we affirm the…”
Tucker v. Uhl, 2023 Ohio 3680 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “{¶ 15} R.C. 2903.214 governs both civil stalking and sexually oriented offense protection orders.”
Schussheim v. Schussheim, 2013 Ohio 4529 (Ohio 2013).
J.S. v. D.E., 2017 Ohio 7507 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “The civil stalking protection order was issued under R.C. 2903.214, which cites R.C. 3113.31 for the definition of family or household member.”
Dunn v. Clark, 2016 Ohio 641 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(C)(2) — 1 case
Ellis v. Skinner, 2022 Ohio 4793 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(C)(3) — 1 case
Tucker v. Uhl, 2023 Ohio 3680 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “{¶ 15} R.C. 2903.214 governs both civil stalking and sexually oriented offense protection orders.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(D) — 3 cases
Lloyd v. Thornsbery, 2018 Ohio 2893 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
A.A. v. S.P., 2025 Ohio 3081 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
Walker v. Walker, 2011 Ohio 3933 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(D)(1) — 14 cases
Disciplinary Couns. v. Pullins, 2010 Ohio 6241 (Ohio 2010).
T.O. v. T.G., 2024 Ohio 4510 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “filed a petition for a sexually oriented offense civil protection order pursuant to R.C. 2903.214. As part of her petition, T.”
Curry v. Bettison, 2023 Ohio 1911 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “Discussion {¶ 9} Under R.C. 2903.214, persons are allowed to seek protection orders against any person who is over the age of 18 and has engaged in a violation of R.”
Clements v. Brown, 2022 Ohio 1959 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Copas v. Luikart, 2025 Ohio 1694 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(D)(2) — 3 cases
Trammell v. Powell, 2011 Ohio 2978 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
Chrysler Fin. Servs. v. Henderson, 2011 Ohio 6813 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
N.S. v. M.S., 2024 Ohio 6020 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(D)(2)(a) — 11 cases
State v. Smith, 2013 Ohio 1698 (Ohio 2013). “On April 12, 2010, Pickens filed a petition in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, pursuant to R.C. 2903.214,1 for an ex parte SSOOPO against Smith.”
State v. Schell, 2017 Ohio 2641 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
M.H. v. J.P., 2017 Ohio 33 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
Losey v. Diersing, 2013 Ohio 1108 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
Echemann v. Echemann, 2016 Ohio 3212 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(D)(2)(a)(i) — 2 cases
State v. Smith, 2013 Ohio 1698 (Ohio 2013). “On April 12, 2010, Pickens filed a petition in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, pursuant to R.C. 2903.214,1 for an ex parte SSOOPO against Smith.”
McWilliam v. Dickey, 2013 Ohio 4036 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(D)(2)(a)(ii) — 1 case
State v. Schell, 2017 Ohio 2641 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(D)(2)(a)(iv) — 2 cases
Sweet v. Hunt, 2014 Ohio 631 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
Losey v. Diersing, 2013 Ohio 1108 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(D)(2)(b) — 1 case
State v. Smith, 2013 Ohio 1698 (Ohio 2013). “On April 12, 2010, Pickens filed a petition in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, pursuant to R.C. 2903.214,1 for an ex parte SSOOPO against Smith.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(D)(3) — 6 cases
L.M.W. v. B.A., 2022 Ohio 2416 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Rufener v. Hutson, 2012 Ohio 5061 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
Elkins v. Manley, 2016 Ohio 8307 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
Clements v. Brown, 2022 Ohio 1959 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
N.P. v. T.N., 2018 Ohio 2647 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(D)(3)(b) — 1 case
T.O. v. T.G., 2024 Ohio 4510 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “filed a petition for a sexually oriented offense civil protection order pursuant to R.C. 2903.214. As part of her petition, T.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(E) — 4 cases
Boals v. Miller, 2011 Ohio 1470 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
Sheerer v. Billak, 2017 Ohio 1556 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
Elkins v. Reed, 2014 Ohio 1216 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
Elkins v. Reed, 2014 Ohio 1217 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(E)(1) — 7 cases
Lazor v. Souders, 2024 Ohio 774 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
Boals v. Miller, 2011 Ohio 1470 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
Coleman v. Razete, 2019 Ohio 2106 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Harris v. Miami Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 827 N.E.2d 807 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). “This temporary restraining order, pursuant to R.C. 2903.214, was eventually dismissed when the court entered an order pursuant'to a consent agreement on December 4, 2000.”
Tucker v. Uhl, 2023 Ohio 3680 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “{¶ 15} R.C. 2903.214 governs both civil stalking and sexually oriented offense protection orders.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(E)(1)(a) — 9 cases
Bey v. Rasawehr (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3301 (Ohio 2020). “] First Amendment—Prior restraints—R.C. 2903.214—Civil-stalking protection order enjoining future Internet postings about a person imposes an unconstitutional prior restraint on protected speech in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution—Court of…”
R.G. v. R.M., 2017 Ohio 8918 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
Curry v. Bettison, 2023 Ohio 1911 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “Discussion {¶ 9} Under R.C. 2903.214, persons are allowed to seek protection orders against any person who is over the age of 18 and has engaged in a violation of R.”
Bey v. Rasawehr, 2019 Ohio 57 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Clements v. Brown, 2022 Ohio 1959 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(E)(1)(b) — 1 case
Ellis v. Skinner, 2022 Ohio 4793 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(E)(2) — 1 case
State v. McGrath, 2012 Ohio 816 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(E)(2)(a) — 6 cases
State v. Smith, 2013 Ohio 1698 (Ohio 2013). “On April 12, 2010, Pickens filed a petition in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, pursuant to R.C. 2903.214,1 for an ex parte SSOOPO against Smith.”
Curry v. Bettison, 2023 Ohio 1911 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “Discussion {¶ 9} Under R.C. 2903.214, persons are allowed to seek protection orders against any person who is over the age of 18 and has engaged in a violation of R.”
Taylor v. Taylor, 2012 Ohio 6190 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).
D.F. v. Starkey (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
W.P.C. v. S.R., 2020 Ohio 3178 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(F)(1) — 6 cases
State v. Smith, 2013 Ohio 1698 (Ohio 2013). “On April 12, 2010, Pickens filed a petition in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, pursuant to R.C. 2903.214,1 for an ex parte SSOOPO against Smith.”
State v. Hart, 2024 Ohio 2037 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Terrell, 2014 Ohio 4344 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
Cleveland v. K.C., 2018 Ohio 3567 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Pittman, 2026 Ohio 703 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(G) — 7 cases
Curry v. Bettison, 2023 Ohio 1911 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “Discussion {¶ 9} Under R.C. 2903.214, persons are allowed to seek protection orders against any person who is over the age of 18 and has engaged in a violation of R.”
State v. Smith, 2013 Ohio 1698 (Ohio 2013). “On April 12, 2010, Pickens filed a petition in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, pursuant to R.C. 2903.214,1 for an ex parte SSOOPO against Smith.”
Preston v. Shutway, 2013 Ohio 185 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
J.P. v. T.H., 2017 Ohio 233 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
Erdman v. Williams, 2013 Ohio 980 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(G)(1) — 6 cases
Curry v. Bettison, 2023 Ohio 1911 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “Discussion {¶ 9} Under R.C. 2903.214, persons are allowed to seek protection orders against any person who is over the age of 18 and has engaged in a violation of R.”
Bey v. Rasawehr (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3301 (Ohio 2020). “] First Amendment—Prior restraints—R.C. 2903.214—Civil-stalking protection order enjoining future Internet postings about a person imposes an unconstitutional prior restraint on protected speech in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution—Court of…”
Coleman v. Razete, 2019 Ohio 2106 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Tucker v. Uhl, 2023 Ohio 3680 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). “{¶ 15} R.C. 2903.214 governs both civil stalking and sexually oriented offense protection orders.”
N.S. v. M.S., 2024 Ohio 6020 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(G)(2) — 5 cases
N.S. v. M.S., 2024 Ohio 6020 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
Smith v. Neff, 2024 Ohio 1881 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
Lakewood v. Smith, 2025 Ohio 2447 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
Givens v. Loeffler, 2023 Ohio 3987 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Lakewood v. Smith (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(J) — 3 cases
Curtin v. McCulley, 2022 Ohio 2482 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Sheerer v. Billak, 2017 Ohio 1556 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
Robson v. Mason, 2025 Ohio 5385 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(J)(1) — 1 case
D.F. v. Starkey (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(J)(2) — 1 case
S.B. v. L.S., 2025 Ohio 1681 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(K) — 4 cases
Bey v. Rasawehr (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 3301 (Ohio 2020). “] First Amendment—Prior restraints—R.C. 2903.214—Civil-stalking protection order enjoining future Internet postings about a person imposes an unconstitutional prior restraint on protected speech in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution—Court of…”
Bey v. Rasawehr, 2019 Ohio 57 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Harris v. Miami Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 827 N.E.2d 807 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). “This temporary restraining order, pursuant to R.C. 2903.214, was eventually dismissed when the court entered an order pursuant'to a consent agreement on December 4, 2000.”
Walker v. Walker, 2011 Ohio 3933 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(K)(1) — 1 case
C.L. v. Weiler, 2023 Ohio 13 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(K)(1)(b) — 1 case
C.L. v. Weiler, 2023 Ohio 13 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.214(L) — 1 case
Disciplinary Couns. v. O'Neill, 815 N.E.2d 286 (Ohio 2004).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.