(A) No person, in attempting or committing a theft offense or in fleeing immediately after the attempt or offense, shall do any of the following:
(1) Have a deadly weapon on or about the offender's person or under the offender's control;
(2) Inflict, attempt to inflict, or threaten to inflict physical harm on another;
(3) Use or threaten the immediate use of force against another.
(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of robbery. A violation of division (A)(1) or (2) of this section is a felony of the second degree. A violation of division (A)(3) of this section is a felony of the third degree.
(C) As used in this section:
(1) "Deadly weapon" has the same meaning as in section 2923.11 of the Revised Code.
(2) "Theft offense" has the same meaning as in section 2913.01 of the Revised Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 969
cases (268 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: State v. Tolliver (Slip Opinion), 2014-Ohio-3744, 19 N.E.3d 870.
State v. Tolliver (Slip Opinion), 2014-Ohio-3744, 19 N.E.3d 870. · cites it 56דBecause R.C. 2911.02 defines every robbery to include the culpable mental states of the predicate theft offense, R.”
United States v. Willie Yates, 866 F.3d 723 (6th Cir. 2017). · cites it 22דYates’s conviction under Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2911.02 (A)(3) does not qualify as a crime of violence under U.”
State v. Colon, 885 N.E.2d 917 (Ohio 2008). · cites it 13ד21(B) addresses both strict-liability statutes and those statutes, like the robbery statute (R.C. 2911.02), that do not expressly state a culpable mental state.”
State v. Lester, 2009-Ohio-4225, 916 N.E.2d 1038. · cites it 27ד2d 172 , paragraph one of the syllabus, this court held that “[t]he deadly weapon element of R.C. 2911.02(A)(1) * * * does not require the mens rea of recklessness.”
State v. Horner, 2010-Ohio-3830, 935 N.E.2d 26. · cites it 10דThe court held that the statute plainly indicated a purpose to impose strict liability, thus precluding the application of recklessness as the culpable mental state.”
State v. Harris, 2009-Ohio-3323, 911 N.E.2d 882. · cites it 15דRobbery defined in R.C. 2911.02(A)(2) and aggravated robbery defined in R.”
State v. Harper (Slip Opinion), 2020-Ohio-2913, 159 N.E.3d 248. · cites it 4ד{¶ 41} In this case, Harper was indicted on two counts of robbery in violation of R.C. 2911.02(A)(2) and 2911.02(A)(3), which are second- and third- degree felonies, respectively, pursuant to R.”
State v. Wharf, 715 N.E.2d 172 (Ohio 1999). · cites it 18ד” As previously mentioned, the offense of robbery is defined in R.C. 2911.02. Appellant was convicted of violating R.”
State v. Evans, 2009-Ohio-2974, 911 N.E.2d 889. · cites it 7דFor the reasons that follow, robbery as defined in R.C. 2911.02(A)(2) is a lesser included offense of aggravated robbery as defined in R.”
State v. Watson, 796 N.E.2d 578 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 2003). · cites it 22דR.C. 2911.02(A) states: {¶ 5} “(A) No person, in attempting or committing a theft offense or in fleeing immediately after the attempt or offense, shall do any of the following: {¶ 6} “(1) Have a deadly weapon on or about the offender’s person or under the offender’s control; {¶…”
State v. Frazier, 2016-Ohio-727. · cites it 7ד{¶ 35} R.C. 2911.02, the robbery statute, provides: (A) No person, in attempting or committing a theft offense or in fleeing immediately after the attempt or offense, shall do any of the following: (1) Have a deadly weapon on or about the offender’s person or under the…”
State v. V.M.D., 2016-Ohio-8090, 71 N.E.3d 274. · cites it 8ד01(A)(9)(a) defines a violation of R.C. 2911.02, robbery, as an offense of violence; R.”
State v. Tolliver (Slip Opinion), 2014-Ohio-3744, 19 N.E.3d 870. “Because R.C. 2911.02 defines every robbery to include the culpable mental states of the predicate theft offense, R.”
State v. Frazier, 2016-Ohio-727. “{¶ 35} R.C. 2911.02, the robbery statute, provides: (A) No person, in attempting or committing a theft offense or in fleeing immediately after the attempt or offense, shall do any of the following: (1) Have a deadly weapon on or about the offender’s person or under the…”
State v. Lester, 2009-Ohio-4225, 916 N.E.2d 1038. “2d 172 , paragraph one of the syllabus, this court held that “[t]he deadly weapon element of R.C. 2911.02(A)(1) * * * does not require the mens rea of recklessness.”
State v. Wharf, 715 N.E.2d 172 (Ohio 1999). “” As previously mentioned, the offense of robbery is defined in R.C. 2911.02. Appellant was convicted of violating R.”
State v. Horner, 2010-Ohio-3830, 935 N.E.2d 26. “The court held that the statute plainly indicated a purpose to impose strict liability, thus precluding the application of recklessness as the culpable mental state.”
State v. Haney, 906 N.E.2d 472 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2009).
State v. Colon, 885 N.E.2d 917 (Ohio 2008). “21(B) addresses both strict-liability statutes and those statutes, like the robbery statute (R.C. 2911.02), that do not expressly state a culpable mental state.”
State v. Harris, 2009-Ohio-3323, 911 N.E.2d 882. “Robbery defined in R.C. 2911.02(A)(2) and aggravated robbery defined in R.”
State v. Evans, 2009-Ohio-2974, 911 N.E.2d 889. “For the reasons that follow, robbery as defined in R.C. 2911.02(A)(2) is a lesser included offense of aggravated robbery as defined in R.”
State v. Horner, 2010-Ohio-3830, 935 N.E.2d 26. “The court held that the statute plainly indicated a purpose to impose strict liability, thus precluding the application of recklessness as the culpable mental state.”
State v. Lester, 2009-Ohio-4225, 916 N.E.2d 1038. “2d 172 , paragraph one of the syllabus, this court held that “[t]he deadly weapon element of R.C. 2911.02(A)(1) * * * does not require the mens rea of recklessness.”
State v. Tolliver (Slip Opinion), 2014-Ohio-3744, 19 N.E.3d 870. “Because R.C. 2911.02 defines every robbery to include the culpable mental states of the predicate theft offense, R.”
State v. V.M.D., 2016-Ohio-8090, 71 N.E.3d 274. “01(A)(9)(a) defines a violation of R.C. 2911.02, robbery, as an offense of violence; R.”
State v. Watson, 796 N.E.2d 578 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 2003). “R.C. 2911.02(A) states: {¶ 5} “(A) No person, in attempting or committing a theft offense or in fleeing immediately after the attempt or offense, shall do any of the following: {¶ 6} “(1) Have a deadly weapon on or about the offender’s person or under the offender’s control; {¶…”
State v. Hughey, 685 N.E.2d 1318 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 1996).
Ohio Rev. Code § 2911.02(B): 29 cases
State v. Harper (Slip Opinion), 2020-Ohio-2913, 159 N.E.3d 248. “{¶ 41} In this case, Harper was indicted on two counts of robbery in violation of R.C. 2911.02(A)(2) and 2911.02(A)(3), which are second- and third- degree felonies, respectively, pursuant to R.”
State v. Frazier, 2016-Ohio-727. “{¶ 35} R.C. 2911.02, the robbery statute, provides: (A) No person, in attempting or committing a theft offense or in fleeing immediately after the attempt or offense, shall do any of the following: (1) Have a deadly weapon on or about the offender’s person or under the…”
State v. Tolliver (Slip Opinion), 2014-Ohio-3744, 19 N.E.3d 870. “Because R.C. 2911.02 defines every robbery to include the culpable mental states of the predicate theft offense, R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.