Notes of Decisions
Thomasson v. Thomasson (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-2417, 106 N.E.3d 1239.
· cites it 20× “Instead, R.C. 3109.01 provides Carol a 15 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO substantial right that is affected by the trial court’s order appointing a guardian ad litem in the divorce action.”
Carnes v. Kemp, 2004-Ohio-7107, 821 N.E.2d 180.
· cites it 4× “As stated by the able author of the well-reasoned and practical appellate court opinion, once a child reaches the age of majority, it is presumed that the child had received adequate support during minority; any action filed 1. Effective March 22, 2001, R.”
Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (1990).
· cites it 2× “Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 3109.01 (1989). [10] The Ohio court reached this conclusion because "when the `proper purposes' exceptions set forth in R.”
Abbas v. Abbas, 715 N.E.2d 613 (Ohio Ct. App. 7th Dist. 1998).
· cites it 9× “Appellant claimed therein that James never reached the age of majority as that term is defined in R.C. 3109.01 because he has always been disabled.”
State v. Johnson, 695 N.W.2d 165 (Neb. 2005).
· cites it 2× “Supreme Court found no merit in the defendant's claim that the Ohio Supreme Court's resorting to Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 3109.01 (Anderson 1989) could not save the statute from his vagueness claim.”
Ayers v. Ayers, 2024-Ohio-1833, 255 N.E.3d 1.
· cites it 2× “The court of appeals disagreed, concluding that the trial court determined that David was voluntarily unemployed by considering several factors enumerated in R.C. 3109.01(C)(17)(a) to impute 4 January Term, 2024 potential income.”
Cramer v. Petrie, 637 N.E.2d 882 (Ohio 1994).
· cites it 2× ““(B) Notwithstanding section 3109.01 of the Revised Code, the parental duty of support to children, including the duty of a parent to pay support pursuant to a child support order, shall continue beyond the age of majority as long as the child continuously attends on a full-time…”
In re Dissolution of Marriage of Lazor, 572 N.E.2d 66 (Ohio 1991).
· cites it 3× “03 requires all parents, whether their marriage has been dissolved or not, to support their children so long as they are regularly attending high school, even if they are over the “age of majority” as defined by R.C. 3109.01. Appellee, primarily relying on Meyer v.”
Mazzuckelli v. Mazzuckelli, 666 N.E.2d 620 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1995).
· cites it 5× “’ (R.C. 3109.01, construed.)” In Lazor, the court held that the noncustodial father’s obligation to pay child support pursuant to a separation agreement incorporated into a decree of dissolution terminated on the child’s eighteenth birthday even though the child was attending an…”
Swanson v. Swanson, 671 N.E.2d 1333 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 1996).
· cites it 5× “” R.C. 3109.01 provides that the age of majority in Ohio is eighteen years of age.”
Verplatse v. Verplatse, 477 N.E.2d 648 (Ohio Ct. App. 3d Dist. 1984).
· cites it 3× “If he is unable to do so, the wife must assist him so far as she is able.”
In re Palcisco, 2012-Ohio-6134.
· cites it 4× “01, which defines persons as “of full age” if they have reached the age of eighteen and are “under no legal disability,” “reflects the principle that mentally or physically disabled children should be excepted from a strictly age-based emancipation rule.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 3109.01(B)(19): 1 case
Ohio Rev. Code § 3109.01(C)(17): 1 case
Ohio Rev. Code § 3109.01(C)(17)(1): 1 case
Ohio Rev. Code § 3109.01(C)(17)(a): 3 cases
Ayers v. Ayers, 2024-Ohio-1833, 255 N.E.3d 1.
“The court of appeals disagreed, concluding that the trial court determined that David was voluntarily unemployed by considering several factors enumerated in R.C. 3109.01(C)(17)(a) to impute 4 January Term, 2024 potential income.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 3109.01(E)(1)(a): 1 case
Ohio Rev. Code § 3109.01(F)(1)(a): 1 case
Ohio Rev. Code § 3109.01(F)(1)(c): 1 case
Ohio Rev. Code § 3109.01(F)(1)(d): 1 case
Ohio Rev. Code § 3109.01(F)(1)(j): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.