Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7115
Renumbered as § 843.5 of Title 21 by Laws 2009, c. 233, §
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
207, emerg. eff. May 21, 2009.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 45
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1996–2026 · leading case: Gilson v. State
Gilson v. State (2000)
“CF-96-245; five counts of Injury to a Minor Child (10 O.S.Supp.1995, § 7115), Case No. CF-96-256; Conspiracy to Unlawfully Remove a Dead Body (21 O.”
Mitchell v. State (2005)
“7(C) (Count 1), Child Abuse, in violation of 10 O.S.Supp.1999, § 7115 (Count 3), and Child Sexual Abuse, in violation of 10 O.”
Fairchild v. State (2000)
“The mens rea element of child abuse murder, like other enumerated felonies, is supplied by the underlying felony which in this case is child abuse (10 O.S.Supp.1999, § 7115 formerly 21 O.S.”
Baker Ex Rel. Baker v. Saint Francis Hospital (2005)
“[4] For conviction under the criminal statute (10 O.S. § 7115) to which Amy Davis pled guilty it is not required that a specific intent to injure or harm be shown, only an intent or purpose to do the act.”
Ball v. State (2007)
“7(C); and Count II, child neglect, in violation of 10 O.S.Supp.2002, § 7115(C). The jury sentenced Appellant to life imprisonment without possibility of parole in Count I and life imprisonment in Count II.”
Huskey v. State (1999)
“SUMMARY OPINION CHAPEL, Presiding Judge: ¶ 1 Jim Ann Huskey and John Huskey were jointly tried by jury and convicted of Child Abuse in violation of 10 O.S.Supp.1995, § 7115, in the District Court of Bryan County, Case Nos.”
Parker v. Scott (2005)
“21, § 843 (1991), replaced by Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7115 (Supp.”
Ibarra v. Holder, Jr. (2013)
“Code § 14-09-22 (Michie, Westlaw through 1995 legislation); Oklahoma: Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7115 (Westlaw through 1996 legislation); Pennsylvania: 18 Pa.”
Gilson v. Sirmons (2008)
“Gilson notes that the jury in his case "was instructed that `permitting' child abuse could be committed by `a person responsible for a child's health or welfare' which was the new language of 10 O.S. § 7115, effective 11/1/1995." Aplt.”
United States v. Vaughan (2003)
“” Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 7115 (1997).”
Smith v. Dinwiddie (2007)
“in violation of Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7115 . 3 Several months later, after the deprived-child action had concluded, the state was ready to begin the criminal trial.”
A.O. v. STATE (2019)
“5 The defendant in Huskey was convicted of Child Sexual Abuse pursuant to 10 O.S.Supp.1995, § 7115. In 2009, HB 2028 recodified the statute prohibiting Child Sexual Abuse as 21 O.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7115(A) — 3 cases
Mitchell v. State (2005)
“7(C) (Count 1), Child Abuse, in violation of 10 O.S.Supp.1999, § 7115 (Count 3), and Child Sexual Abuse, in violation of 10 O.”
Messick v. State (2004)
State v. Gatewood (2026)
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7115(C) — 1 case
Ball v. State (2007)
“7(C); and Count II, child neglect, in violation of 10 O.S.Supp.2002, § 7115(C). The jury sentenced Appellant to life imprisonment without possibility of parole in Count I and life imprisonment in Count II.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7115(E) — 2 cases
BREWER v. STATE (2019)
STATE v. VINCENT (2016)
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7115(F) — 1 case
DONALDSON v. CITY OF EL RENO (2025)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.