Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 776.1 (2026)

Fraudulent electronic mail messages

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. It shall be unlawful for a person to initiate an electronic mail message that the sender knows, or has reason to know: 1. Misrepresents any information in identifying the point of origin or the transmission path of the electronic mail message; 2. Does not contain information identifying the point of origin or the transmission path of the electronic mail message; 3. Contains false, malicious, or misleading information which purposely or negligently injures a person; 4. Falsely represents that it is being sent by a legitimate online business; 5. Refers or links the recipient of the message to a web page that is represented as being associated with a legitimate online business with the intent to engage in conduct involving the fraudulent use or possession of identifying information; or 6. Directly or indirectly induces, requests, or solicits the recipient of the electronic mail message to provide identifying information for a purpose the recipient believes is legitimate. B. Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00). C. All acts and practices declared to be unlawful by subsections A and E of this section shall, in addition, be violations of the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act. D. For purposes of this section, an electronic mail message which is declared to be unlawful by subsection A of this section shall be considered a fraudulent electronic mail message or a fraudulent bulk electronic mail message and shall be deemed a Class D1 felony offense punishable by imprisonment as provided for in subsections B through F of Section 20N of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes.

E. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, give, or otherwise distribute or possess with the intent to sell, give or distribute software which: 1. Is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of facilitating or enabling the falsification of electronic mail transmission information or other routing information; 2. Has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to facilitate or enable the falsification of electronic mail transmission information or other routing information; or 3. Is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person and with that person’s knowledge for use in facilitating or enabling the falsification of electronic mail transmission information or other routing information. Any person who violates the provisions of this subsection shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a Class D1 felony offense and shall be punished by imprisonment as provided for in subsections B through F of Section 20N of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes. Added by Laws 1999, c. 337, § 1, eff. July 1, 1999. Amended by Laws 2006, c. 56, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 2006; Laws 2025, c. 486, § 350, eff. Jan. 1, 2026.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2009–2009 · leading case: Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc., 575 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir. 2009).
Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc., 575 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 4× “In Omega, Mummagraphics alleged violations of the CAN-SPAM Act and Oklahoma law, see Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 776.1 (A), [18] based on e-mail messages that contained a variety of inaccuracies.”
Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “In Omega, Mummagraphics alleged violations of the CAN- SPAM Act and Oklahoma law, see Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 776.1 (A),18 based on e-mail messages that contained a vari- ety of inaccuracies.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.