Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537 (2026)

Repealed by Laws 2016, c. 366, § 169, eff. Oct. 1, 2018

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by Laws 2016, c. 366, § 169, eff. Oct. 1, 2018.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1962–2023 · leading case: Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. Todd, 813 P.2d 508 (Okla. 1991).
Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. Todd, 813 P.2d 508 (Okla. 1991). · cites it 9× “The purpose or intent of Article 28, § 5 is not limited to the protection of sober third persons nor is it limited to the prevention of injury to third persons caused by drunken driving.”
Busby v. Quail Creek Golf & Country Club, 885 P.2d 1326 (Okla. 1994). · cites it 8× “The adult brought suit against the bar alleging that the tavern served him alcoholic *1330 beverages although he was noticeably intoxicated in violation of 37 O.S.1991 § 537. 12 Following the reasoning of the majority of states, we refused to extend the duty of the tavern owner…”
Rife v. Oklahoma Dep't of Pub. Saf., 854 F.3d 637 (10th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “Trooper Jefferson reported that the arrest had been for public intoxication under Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537 , but this statute involves intoxication from alcohol rather than medication.”
Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enf't Comm'n, 764 P.2d 172 (Okla. 1988). · cites it 3× “4 *177 After receiving a Notice of Contemplated Suspension or Revocation of License for purported violation of 37 O.S.Supp.1985, § 537(A)(2), Appellee was afforded a hearing before an ABLE Commission hearing officer on March 4, 1986.”
Johnson v. Mid-South Sports, Inc., 806 P.2d 1107 (Okla. 1991). · cites it 4× “Title 37 O.S.Supp.1989 §§ 537 and 538 prohibit the selling or furnishing of alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated person.”
Brigance v. Velvet Dove Restaurant, Inc., 725 P.2d 300 (Okla. 1986). · cites it 2× “[7] 37 O.S.Supp.1985 § 537 provides in pertinent part: "(A) No person shall: (1) Knowingly sell, deliver, or furnish alcoholic beverages to any person under twenty-one (21) years of age; (2) Sell, deliver or knowingly furnish alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated person or to…”
Mansfield v. Circle K. Corp., 877 P.2d 1130 (Okla. 1994). · cites it 3× “Sell, deliver or knowingly furnish alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated person or to any person who has been adjudged insane or mentally deficient.”
Boyle v. Asap Energy, Inc., 2017 OK 82 (Okla. 2017). “Todd , 24 we noted the statutory duty of a commercial vendor of alcohol arising from 37 O.S. § 537 not to "sell, deliver or knowingly furnish alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated person.”
Shadid v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 639 P.2d 1239 (Okla. 1982). · cites it 4× “27 § 4, 1 and 37 O.S.1971 § 537(c)(6), 2 to cash a check which exceeds *1241 the purchase price of alcoholic beverages, and return the change to the customer; and 2) may the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board [ABC Board] and its director be enjoined from enforcing an…”
Bittle v. Bahe, 2008 OK 10 (Okla. 2008). “T 49 One of the laws to which Thunderbird casino agreed to be bound is 37 O.S.2001, § 537(A)(2). Section 537(A)(2) prohibits a person from selling, delivering, or knowingly furnishing "alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated person.”
Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 (Okla. 1973). · cites it 2× “Frank Harold Moss, (licensee) was cited by the Board for violation of 37 O.S.1971 § 537(a)(1) of the Oklahoma Beverage Control Act, and Art.”
Tomlinson v. Love's Country Stores, Inc., 854 P.2d 910 (Okla. 1993). “The statute involved in that case was 37 O.S.Supp.1985, § 537. In pertinent part the statute provides: (A) No person shall: (1) Knowingly sell, deliver, or furnish alcoholic beverages to any person under twenty-one (21) years of age; (2) Sell, deliver or knowingly furnish…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537(A)(2) — 4 cases
Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. Todd, 813 P.2d 508 (Okla. 1991). “The purpose or intent of Article 28, § 5 is not limited to the protection of sober third persons nor is it limited to the prevention of injury to third persons caused by drunken driving.”
Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enf't Comm'n, 764 P.2d 172 (Okla. 1988). “4 *177 After receiving a Notice of Contemplated Suspension or Revocation of License for purported violation of 37 O.S.Supp.1985, § 537(A)(2), Appellee was afforded a hearing before an ABLE Commission hearing officer on March 4, 1986.”
Bittle v. Bahe, 2008 OK 10 (Okla. 2008). “T 49 One of the laws to which Thunderbird casino agreed to be bound is 37 O.S.2001, § 537(A)(2). Section 537(A)(2) prohibits a person from selling, delivering, or knowingly furnishing "alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated person.”
Megee v. El Patio, 2023 OK 14 (Okla. 2023).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537(H) — 1 case
Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enf't Comm'n, 764 P.2d 172 (Okla. 1988). “4 *177 After receiving a Notice of Contemplated Suspension or Revocation of License for purported violation of 37 O.S.Supp.1985, § 537(A)(2), Appellee was afforded a hearing before an ABLE Commission hearing officer on March 4, 1986.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537(a) — 4 cases
— Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537(a)(1) — 2 cases
Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 (Okla. 1973). “Frank Harold Moss, (licensee) was cited by the Board for violation of 37 O.S.1971 § 537(a)(1) of the Oklahoma Beverage Control Act, and Art.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537(a)(2) — 1 case
— Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537(a)(8) — 1 case
Moore v. City of Tulsa, 561 P.2d 961 (Okla. 1977).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537(b) — 1 case
— Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537(c) — 1 case
— Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537(c)(4) — 1 case
— Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537(c)(6) — 1 case
Shadid v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 639 P.2d 1239 (Okla. 1982). “27 § 4, 1 and 37 O.S.1971 § 537(c)(6), 2 to cash a check which exceeds *1241 the purchase price of alcoholic beverages, and return the change to the customer; and 2) may the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board [ABC Board] and its director be enjoined from enforcing an…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 37, § 537(e) — 1 case
Williams v. State, 508 P.2d 1087 (Okla. Crim. App. 1973).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.