Okla. Stat. tit. 40, § 562

Disciplinary actions

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. An employer's policy shall state the disciplinary actions that may be taken upon a refusal to undergo a drug or alcohol test or for a positive test for the presence of drugs or alcohol. B. An employer may take disciplinary action, up to and including discharge, against an employee who refuses to undergo drug or alcohol testing conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 551 et seq. of this title or who tests positive for the presence of drugs or alcohol. C. Notwithstanding any provision of law for confidentiality of drug or alcohol testing results, nothing in the Standards for Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Act shall preclude an employer, contracting with another employer, from sharing drug or alcohol testing results of any tested person who works pursuant to such contractual agreement. Added by Laws 1993, c. 355, § 12, emerg. eff. June 10, 1993. Amended by Laws 2011, c. 180, § 8, eff. Nov. 1, 2011; Laws 2012, c. 196, § 21, emerg. eff. May 8, 2012.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2006 · leading case: McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co.
McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co. (2006) okla · cites it 5× “¶ 8 1) The Legislature’s utilization of the phrase requiring that a test result be “confirmed” before an employee is subject to dismissal pursuant to 40 O.S.2001 § 562 rather than referring to the statutorily defined term, “confirmation test,” contained in 40 O.”
Karnes v. Boeing Company (2003) ca10 · cites it 2× “” Okla. Stat. tit. 40, § 562 (A).). In order to establish a violation of this section, Karnes must show that Boeing (1) discharged him based on his drug test, and (2) failed to confirm the result through a second test.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.