105.815 When
double damages are awarded for trespass; exception. (1) Except as provided in
subsection (3) of this section, if, upon the trial of an action included in ORS
105.810, it appears that the trespass was casual or involuntary, or that the
defendant had probable cause to believe that the land on which the trespass was
committed was the land of the defendant or the land of the person in whose
service or by whose direction the act was done, or that the tree or timber was
taken from unenclosed woodland for the purpose of repairing any public highway
or bridge upon the land or adjoining it, judgment shall be given for double
damages.
(2) A judgment
for the costs of litigation and reforestation as provided in ORS 105.810 shall
be in addition to and not in lieu of a judgment for damages under this section.
(3) This section
does not apply to a contract logger if the contract logger is subject only to
actual damages under ORS 105.810 (4). [Amended by 1995 c.721 §2; 1999 c.544 §2]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
35
cases (
4 in the last 5 years), 1955–2024 · leading case:
Wyatt v. Sweitz
Wyatt v. Sweitz (1997)
orctapp · cites it 19×
“Plaintiff appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s allowance of partial judgment on the pleadings, ORCP 21 B, against his claim for “casual or involuntary” timber trespass, ORS 105.815. Defendant cross-appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s allowance of attorney…”
Bighorn Logging Corp. v. Truck Ins. Exch. (2019)
orctapp · cites it 2×
“810 ; ORS 105.815. Ater relied on the same factual allegations to support both claims, namely, Ater alleged that Bighorn had exceeded the limited license granted by Ater when it used a chainsaw to cut and girdle numerous trees on Ater's property in lieu of using the promised…”
Worman v. Columbia County (2008)
orctapp · cites it 3×
“810 and ORS 105.815, the double-damages timber trespass statutes] apply to injuries to [the] plaintiffs’ fruit crops and trees caused by fumes emitted from [the] defendants’ plant.”
Olson v. Howard (2010)
orctapp · cites it 3×
“810; ORS 105.815. 2 Howard, in a single motion, moved to strike all allegations from plaintiffs amended complaint that pertained to him, or, alternatively, to make the amended complaint more definite and certain regarding what relief was sought against him.”
Simington Gardens, LLC v. Rock Ridge Farms, LLC (2021)
orctapp · cites it 24×
“810, and double damages when the “trespass to pro- duce” is “casual or involuntary,” ORS 105.815. ORS 105.810 additionally provides for an award of attorney fees to the prevailing party.”
Loe Et Ux v. Lenhard (1961)
or · cites it 2×
“The plaintiff proceeded on the theory that both defendants were liable for an accidental trespass.”
Nordling v. Johnston (1955)
or · cites it 2×
“There are many points of difference between this provision and ORS 105.815, which was considered in Kinzua Lumber Co.”
Sinsel v. Henderson (1983)
orctapp · cites it 6×
“The trial court awarded plaintiffs double damages for timber trespass, ORS 105.815, and dismissed defendants’ counterclaim and suit to quiet title to the property on the ground of adverse possession.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 105.815(1) — 5 cases
Bighorn Logging Corp. v. Truck Ins. Exch. (2019)
orctapp
“810 ; ORS 105.815. Ater relied on the same factual allegations to support both claims, namely, Ater alleged that Bighorn had exceeded the limited license granted by Ater when it used a chainsaw to cut and girdle numerous trees on Ater's property in lieu of using the promised…”
Olson v. Howard (2010)
orctapp
“810; ORS 105.815. 2 Howard, in a single motion, moved to strike all allegations from plaintiffs amended complaint that pertained to him, or, alternatively, to make the amended complaint more definite and certain regarding what relief was sought against him.”
Simington Gardens, LLC v. Rock Ridge Farms, LLC (2021)
orctapp
“810, and double damages when the “trespass to pro- duce” is “casual or involuntary,” ORS 105.815. ORS 105.810 additionally provides for an award of attorney fees to the prevailing party.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.