Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 106.030 (2026)

Voidable marriages

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      106.030 Voidable marriages. When either party to a marriage is incapable of making such contract or consenting thereto for want of legal age or sufficient understanding, or when the consent of either party is obtained by force or fraud, such marriage shall be void from the time it is so declared by judgment of a court having jurisdiction thereof. [Amended by 2003 c.576 §372]

 

      106.040 [Repealed by 1953 c.143 §9]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1955–1984 · leading case: Dibble v. Meyer, 280 P.2d 765 (Or. 1955).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dibble v. Meyer, 280 P.2d 765 (Or. 1955). “ORS 106.030 provides: “When either party to a marriage is incapable of making such contract or consenting thereto for want of legal age or sufficient understanding, or when the consent of either party is obtained by force or fraud, such marriage shall be void from the time it is…”
State v. Anderson, 396 P.2d 558 (Or. 1964). · cites it 2× “The majority opinion merely adds to the voidable marriages listed in ORS 106.030 a further class, namely: marriages in which either one or both of the parties are not personally present as required by law.”
Baker v. Munro, 692 P.2d 126 (Or. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 3× “” 2 Defendant argues that mother’s marriage to Pastor was not void, but merely voidable under ORS 106.030, because Pastor’s consent to the marriage was obtained by mother’s false representation that he was the father of her unborn child.”
Hunter v. Craft, 588 P.2d 617 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 3× “ORS 106.030. The death of a party to a marriage terminates *551 the marriage and a suit for annulment does not survive the death.”
Holland v. Ribicoff, 219 F. Supp. 274 (D. Or. 1962). · cites it 2× “vidual who died a fully insured individual, if such widow * * * (A) has not remarried, * * * shall be entitled to a widow’s insurance benefit for each month, beginning with the first month after August 1950 in which she becomes so entitled to such insurance benefits and ending…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.