Or. Rev. Stat. § 131.155
Tolling of statute; three-year maximum
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
131.155 Tolling of statute; three-year maximum. Notwithstanding ORS 131.145, in no case shall the period of limitation otherwise applicable be extended by more than three years. [1973 c.836 §9]
JURISDICTION
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1989–2013 · leading case: Abbott v. Baldwin
Abbott v. Baldwin (2001)
“105 to ORS 131.155 generally relate to the subject of time limitations in criminal actions.”
State v. Stokes (2011)
“ORS 131.155. The practical result, in this case, was a nine-year statute of limitations.”
State v. Bigelow (2005)
“Even assuming that the statute of limitation for this felony — three years— could be extended by the maximum three years under ORS 131.155 because of defendant’s out-of-state residence, more than six years have passed since the offense was committed.”
State v. Pirouzkar (1989)
“145(2)(a) and ORS 131.155 are inapplicable here. Those statutes provide that, when the accused is not an inhabitant or usual resident of Oregon, the normal period of limitation to commence a prosecution is tolled, except that in no case may the period be extended more than three…”
State v. Gerlach (2013)
“…of limitations was tolled for an additional three years because the defendant was out of state. ORS 131.145(2)(a); ORS 131.155.”
State v. Hinkle (2009)
“ORS 131.155, however, provides that the tolling provision in ORS 131.”
State v. Loza (2011)
“145 and ORS 131.155 because he was not a resident of Oregon while he was in Texas, more than six years have passed since the latest offense was committed, which was on March 5, 1999.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.