Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 135.345

Legal effect of plea of no contest

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      135.345 Legal effect of plea of no contest. A judgment following entry of a no contest plea is a conviction of the offense to which the plea is entered. [1973 c.836 §160]

 

      135.350 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §137; renumbered 135.065]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: Matter of Adoption of Eder
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matter of Adoption of Eder (1991) or · cites it 2× “" ORS 135.345 provides: "A judgment following entry of a no contest plea is a conviction of the offense to which the plea is entered.”
United States v. Snyder (2011) ca9 · cites it 2× “One effect specified is that, "[w]hen the offense charged is one for which a different or additional penalty is authorized by reason of the fact that the defendant may be adjudged a dangerous offender, that this fact may be established after a plea in the present action, thereby…”
State v. McAnulty (2014) or “See also ORS 135.345 (regarding effect of no contest plea).”
State v. Bateman (1989) orctapp · cites it 2× “On the other hand, an order revoking probation is also an intermediate order. It is a necessary predicate to a sentence (or to an order requiring the execution of a previously imposed sentence) for a defendant who was originally placed on probation.”
State v. Steed (2025) orctapp · cites it 3× “According to the state, ORS 135.345 provides the necessary language to establish that, for purposes of ORS 157.”
In Re Conduct of Hassenstab (1997) or “Before that incident, the accused had represented that client in a child dependency proceeding. He also represented her afterward in a termination of parental rights proceeding.”
Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District (2004) orctapp “See ORS 135.345. 7 We do not set forth that letter in this opinion.”
State v. Roberts (2013) orctapp · cites it 4× “” *136 Defendant’s statutory construction argument is undermined by ORS 135.345, which provides that “[a] judgment following entry of a no contest plea is a conviction of the offense to which the plea is entered.”
State v. Farley (1986) orctapp “ORS 135.345. Even if a judgment resulting from a no contest plea would bar a subsequent prosecution for an offense arising from the same criminal episode, defendant’s privileges and immunities attack is not well taken.”
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Yacob (1993) or “ORS 135.345. Therefore, the requirement of ORS 9.”
State v. Blair (1985) orctapp “” 3 ORS 135.345 provides: “A judgment following entry of a no contest plea is a conviction of the offense to which the plea is entered.”
State v. Dawson (1982) orctapp · cites it 2× “The state concedes, in addition, that "the exact question put to defendant unfortunately did not specifically refer to any rights which the group was advised of as a whole, and the record therefore does not reveal which rights he was aware of when he answered in the affirmative.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.