135.355
Presentation of plea; entry in register; forms. (1) Every plea shall be oral and
shall be entered in the register of the court in substantially one of the
following forms:
(a) “The
defendant pleads that defendant is guilty of the offense charged in this
accusatory instrument.”
(b) “The
defendant pleads that defendant is not guilty of the offense charged in this
accusatory instrument.”
(c) “The
defendant pleads no contest to the offense charged in this accusatory
instrument.”
(2) When a
defendant enters a conditional plea of guilty or no contest, the entry in the
register of the court shall so indicate.
(3) For purposes
of this section, an oral plea includes a plea made orally by means of
simultaneous electronic transmission as described in ORS 131.045. [Formerly
135.830; 1985 c.540 §32; 1999 c.134 §2; 2005 c.566 §6]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2006–2024 · leading case:
State v. HEISSER
State v. HEISSER (2009)
orctapp · cites it 2×
“335 (identifying the types of pleas that can be entered by a defendant); ORS 135.355 (describing the entry of the defendant's plea in the court's register); ORS 135.”
State v. Tannehill (2006)
or
“ORS 135.355. It recognizes that a plea may be the result of a plea agreement that recommends either dismissal of some counts or reduced sentences on others.”
Lozano-Memije v. Reyes (2024)
orctapp
“However, at his plea hearing, the trial court never requested petitioner to make an oral plea of guilty to those two offenses as required by ORS 135.355(1). The post- conviction court denied relief finding, among other things, that petitioner understood that he was asking the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 135.355(1) — 1 case
Lozano-Memije v. Reyes (2024)
orctapp
“However, at his plea hearing, the trial court never requested petitioner to make an oral plea of guilty to those two offenses as required by ORS 135.355(1). The post- conviction court denied relief finding, among other things, that petitioner understood that he was asking the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.