Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 144.360 (2026)

Effect of order for arrest and detention of violator

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      144.360 Effect of order for arrest and detention of violator. Any order issued by the Department of Corrections or other supervisory authority as authorized by ORS 144.350 constitutes full authority for the arrest and detention of the violator, and all the laws applicable to warrants of arrest shall apply to such orders. [Amended by 1973 c.836 §298; 1987 c.320 §64; 1995 c.423 §26]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: State v. Perrodin, 500 P.3d 704 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Perrodin, 500 P.3d 704 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “” The state argued that, “[p]ursuant to ORS 144.360, parole violation warrants are afforded the same treatment under the law as any other warrant.”
State v. Meier, 929 P.2d 1052 (Or. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “” ORS 144.360 provides: “Any order issued by the Department of Corrections as authorized by ORS 144.”
Arellano-Sanchez v. Thrasher, 374 Or. 623 (Or. 2025). “” See ORS 144.360 (“Any order issued by the Department of Corrections or other supervisory authority as authorized by ORS 144.”
Salem Hosp. v. Marion Cnty., 766 P.2d 376 (Or. 1988). “ORS 144.360. 3 County’s jail policy directs: “Should an inmate present with [sic] an acute illness that, in the determination of qualified medical personnel, requires more sophisticated and demanding care than we can provide here, this inmate will be transferred to Salem…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.