161.675 Time
and method of payment of fines, restitution and costs. (1) When a defendant, as a part of
a sentence or as condition of probation or suspension of sentence, is required
to pay a sum of money for any purpose, the court may order payment to be made
immediately or within a specified period of time or in specified installments.
If a defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment, any part of the sentence
that requires the payment of a sum of money for any purpose is enforceable
during the period of imprisonment if the court expressly finds that the
defendant has assets to pay all or part of the amounts ordered.
(2) When a
defendant whose sentence requires the payment of a sum of money for any purpose
is also sentenced to probation or imposition or execution of sentence is
suspended, the court may make payment of the sum of money a condition of
probation or suspension of sentence.
(3) When a
defendant is sentenced to probation or imposition or execution of sentence is
suspended and the court requires as a part of the sentence or as a condition of
the probation or suspension of sentence that the defendant pay a sum of money
in installments, the court, or the court clerk or parole and probation officer
if so ordered by the court, shall establish a schedule of payments to satisfy
the obligation. A schedule of payments shall be reviewed by the court upon
motion of the defendant at any time, so long as the obligation remains
unsatisfied. [1971 c.743 §81; 1977 c.371 §4; 1985 c.46 §1; 1993 c.14 §19; 1995
c.512 §3; 2005 c.264 §16]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
66
cases (
5 in the last 5 years), 1973–2025 · leading case:
State v. Foos
State v. Foos (2018)
orctapp · cites it 9×
“*117 In this criminal appeal, defendant challenges a term in a judgment stating that "[p]ayment of the fines, fees, assessments, and/or attorney's fees noted in this and any subsequent Money Award shall be scheduled by the clerk of the court pursuant to ORS 161.675." According…”
State v. Lobue (2020)
orctapp · cites it 4×
“The trial court did not exceed its authority by including in the judgment an order authorizing the court to add collection fees and assessments without further notice and directing the clerk of the court to include a collection fee and to schedule payments under ORS 161.675.…”
State v. Fuller (1973)
orctapp · cites it 11×
“Nothing in the challenged statute here affords the defendant in a revocation proceeding to the exemptions provided debtors generally under Oregon law.”
Fuller v. Oregon (1974)
scotus · cites it 4×
“" Ore. Rev. Stat. § 161.675 provides: "(1) When a defendant is sentenced to pay a fine or costs, the court may grant permission for payment to be made within a specified period of time or in specified instalments.”
State v. Lord (2020)
orctapp · cites it 17×
“The judgments stated that the payment of defendant’s fines should be scheduled by the clerk of the court “pursuant to ORS 161.675.” Defendant raises two assignments of error, challenging the trial court’s imposition of finan- cial penalties.”
State v. Lewis (2010)
orctapp · cites it 2×
“As to the merits, defendant contends, in part, that “the trial court in this case had authority to impose the fines and had authority to require the fines’ payment during defendant’s period of incarceration, but only upon making a finding [pursuant to ORS 161.675(1)] that it…”
State v. Davis (1997)
tenn
“§ 99-37-5 (1995); Or.Rev.Stat. § 161.675(1) (1995).”
State v. Wilcher (1989)
orctapp · cites it 6×
“ORS 161.675(1) provides, in pertinent part: “When a defendant, as part of a sentence or as condition of probation or suspension of sentence, is required to pay a sum of money for any purpose, the court may order payment to be made forthwith or within a specified period of time…”
State v. Saunders (2019)
orctapp · cites it 6×
“1 Beginning with his fifth assignment, defendant challenges a term in the judgment providing that "[p]ayment of the fines, fees, assessments, and/or attorney's fees noted in this and any subsequent Money Award shall be scheduled by the clerk of the court pursuant to ORS…”
State v. Martinez (2016)
orctapp · cites it 3×
“PER CURIAM Defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment of conviction, assigning error to the trial court’s inclusion of a provision directing the clerk of court to schedule the payment of defendant’s monetary obligations “pursuant to ORS 161.675.” 1 Defendant was sentenced to…”
State v. Hart (1985)
or
“1 ORS 161.675(1) provides: “When a defendant is sentenced to pay a fine or costs or ordered to make restitution, as defined in ORS 137.”
People v. Cook (1980)
ill
“If it appears to the satisfaction of the court that payment of the amount due will impose manifest hardship on the defendant or his immediate family, the court may remit all or part of the amount due in costs, or modify the method of payment under ORS 161.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.675(1) — 34 cases
State v. Lewis (2010)
orctapp
“As to the merits, defendant contends, in part, that “the trial court in this case had authority to impose the fines and had authority to require the fines’ payment during defendant’s period of incarceration, but only upon making a finding [pursuant to ORS 161.675(1)] that it…”
State v. Davis (1997)
tenn
“§ 99-37-5 (1995); Or.Rev.Stat. § 161.675(1) (1995).”
State v. Lobue (2020)
orctapp
“The trial court did not exceed its authority by including in the judgment an order authorizing the court to add collection fees and assessments without further notice and directing the clerk of the court to include a collection fee and to schedule payments under ORS 161.675.…”
State v. Lord (2020)
orctapp
“The judgments stated that the payment of defendant’s fines should be scheduled by the clerk of the court “pursuant to ORS 161.675.” Defendant raises two assignments of error, challenging the trial court’s imposition of finan- cial penalties.”
State v. Hart (1985)
or
“1 ORS 161.675(1) provides: “When a defendant is sentenced to pay a fine or costs or ordered to make restitution, as defined in ORS 137.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.675(2) — 5 cases
State v. Fuller (1973)
orctapp
“Nothing in the challenged statute here affords the defendant in a revocation proceeding to the exemptions provided debtors generally under Oregon law.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.675(3) — 7 cases
State v. Foos (2018)
orctapp
“*117 In this criminal appeal, defendant challenges a term in a judgment stating that "[p]ayment of the fines, fees, assessments, and/or attorney's fees noted in this and any subsequent Money Award shall be scheduled by the clerk of the court pursuant to ORS 161.675." According…”
State v. Wilcher (1989)
orctapp
“ORS 161.675(1) provides, in pertinent part: “When a defendant, as part of a sentence or as condition of probation or suspension of sentence, is required to pay a sum of money for any purpose, the court may order payment to be made forthwith or within a specified period of time…”
State v. Lord (2020)
orctapp
“The judgments stated that the payment of defendant’s fines should be scheduled by the clerk of the court “pursuant to ORS 161.675.” Defendant raises two assignments of error, challenging the trial court’s imposition of finan- cial penalties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.