Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 186.510 (2026)
Oregon-Washington Columbia River Boundary Compact adopted
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
186.510 Oregon-Washington Columbia River Boundary Compact adopted. The Legislative Assembly of the State of Oregon hereby ratifies the Oregon-Washington Columbia River Boundary Compact set forth in ORS 186.520, and the provisions of such compact hereby are declared to be the law of this state upon such compact becoming operative as provided in Article III of the compact. [1957 c.94 §1]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1977–2011 · leading case: United States v. Crookshanks, 441 F. Supp. 268 (D. Or. 1977).
United States v. Crookshanks, 441 F. Supp. 268 (D. Or. 1977). “455; ORS 186.510; RCW 43.58.050. For present purposes I assume that the acts alleged occurred on the Washington side of the mid-channel line.”
Girod v. Kroger, 268 P.3d 562 (Or. 2011). “The boundary between the two states is the mid-channel of the river; each state may enforce its own laws on its own side and, if the other state has a similar law, may enforce its law on the other state’s side.”
State v. Nearing, 784 P.2d 121 (Or. Ct. App. 1989). “ORS 186.510. That compact, however, did not alter the grant of concurrent jurisdiction in the Admission Act.”
State v. Pepper, 803 P.2d 1213 (Or. Ct. App. 1990). “ORS 186.510. That compact, however, did not alter the grant of concurrent jurisdiction in the Admission Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.