Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.770 (2026)

Firearms training facilities

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      197.770 Firearms training facilities. (1) Any firearms training facility in existence on September 9, 1995, shall be allowed to continue operating until such time as the facility is no longer used as a firearms training facility.

      (2) For purposes of this section, a “firearms training facility” is an indoor or outdoor facility that provides training courses and issues certifications required:

      (a) For law enforcement personnel;

      (b) By the State Department of Fish and Wildlife; or

      (c) By nationally recognized programs that promote shooting matches, target shooting and safety. [1995 c.475 §2]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2006–2013 · leading case: Citizens for Responsibility v. Lane Cnty., 142 P.3d 486 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Citizens for Responsibility v. Lane Cnty., 142 P.3d 486 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 23× “pro tempore Lane County seeks review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision remanding the county’s approval of a special use permit for a firearms training facility for further proceedings consistent with LUBA’s understanding of ORS 197.770. We reverse and remand LUBA’s…”
Citizens for Responsibility v. Lane Cnty., 180 P.3d 35 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “On remand, LUBA affirmed the county’s approval of the league’s special use permit, and this petition for judicial review followed.”
Friends of Yamhill Cnty. v. Yamhill Cnty., 211 P.3d 297 (Or. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “770, which provides that “[a]ny firearms training facility in existence on September 9, 1995, shall be allowed to continue operating until such time as the facility is no longer used as a firearms training facility.” Id. at 503, 503 n 1.”
Conrady v. Lincoln Cnty., 316 P.3d 413 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 3× “There is, however, legislative history concerning a separate bill passed in the 1995 Regular Session, HB 2876, later codified as ORS 197.770, that suggests that the 1995 legislature did not understand the preemption bill, HB 2784, to preempt city and county zoning of shooting…”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.770(2): 2 cases
Citizens for Responsibility v. Lane Cnty., 142 P.3d 486 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “pro tempore Lane County seeks review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision remanding the county’s approval of a special use permit for a firearms training facility for further proceedings consistent with LUBA’s understanding of ORS 197.770. We reverse and remand LUBA’s…”
Conrady v. Lincoln Cnty., 316 P.3d 413 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “There is, however, legislative history concerning a separate bill passed in the 1995 Regular Session, HB 2876, later codified as ORS 197.770, that suggests that the 1995 legislature did not understand the preemption bill, HB 2784, to preempt city and county zoning of shooting…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.