308.233 Use of
sales data for physical appraisal.
(1) For purposes of making a physical appraisal of property for ad valorem
property taxation, in arriving at the value level for the property, any sales
data used shall be examined, analyzed, adjusted and otherwise utilized in such
a manner that the value level determined for the property is substantially
equivalent to the value level that would be determined if the sales data
utilized was the same sales data, and was examined, analyzed, adjusted and
otherwise utilized in the same manner as the sales data utilized in making the
certified ratio study under ORS 309.200.
(2) The purpose
of this section is to achieve equality and uniformity in assessed values
between properties that are physically appraised and those that are not
physically appraised, but subject to trending or indexing for the particular
assessment year. [1979 c.241 §51; 1989 c.330 §15; 1991 c.459 §98; 1997 c.541 §160]
Note: 308.233 was enacted into law by
the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 308
or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised
Statutes for further explanation.
Notes of Decisions
AKS LLC v. Dept. of Rev. (2019)
ortc
“ORS 308.233(2). Additional laws provide direction for the development of data used for trending.”
Gray v. Linn County Assessor (2018)
ortc
“ORS 308.233(2). Trending and indexing are developed from annual “ratio studies” prepared by the county assessors.”
Miller v. Benton County Assessor (2012)
ortc · cites it 3×
“ORS 308.233 discusses the use of “sales data” “[f]or purposes of making a physical appraisal of property for ad valorem property taxation[.”
Rothenfluch v. Department of Revenue (1991)
or
“ORS 308.233 describes how “a physical appraisal of property for ad valorem property taxation” is to be made and states the purpose “to achieve equality and uniformity in assessed values between properties that are physically appraised and those that are not physically appraised,…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 308.233(2) — 4 cases
AKS LLC v. Dept. of Rev. (2019)
ortc
“ORS 308.233(2). Additional laws provide direction for the development of data used for trending.”
Miller v. Benton County Assessor (2012)
ortc
“ORS 308.233 discusses the use of “sales data” “[f]or purposes of making a physical appraisal of property for ad valorem property taxation[.”
Gray v. Linn County Assessor (2018)
ortc
“ORS 308.233(2). Trending and indexing are developed from annual “ratio studies” prepared by the county assessors.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.