Or. Rev. Stat. § 308.233

Use of sales data for physical appraisal

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      308.233 Use of sales data for physical appraisal. (1) For purposes of making a physical appraisal of property for ad valorem property taxation, in arriving at the value level for the property, any sales data used shall be examined, analyzed, adjusted and otherwise utilized in such a manner that the value level determined for the property is substantially equivalent to the value level that would be determined if the sales data utilized was the same sales data, and was examined, analyzed, adjusted and otherwise utilized in the same manner as the sales data utilized in making the certified ratio study under ORS 309.200.

      (2) The purpose of this section is to achieve equality and uniformity in assessed values between properties that are physically appraised and those that are not physically appraised, but subject to trending or indexing for the particular assessment year. [1979 c.241 §51; 1989 c.330 §15; 1991 c.459 §98; 1997 c.541 §160]

 

      Note: 308.233 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 308 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1991–2019 · leading case: Clackamas County Assessor v. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLC
AKS LLC v. Dept. of Rev. (2019) ortc “ORS 308.233(2). Additional laws provide direction for the development of data used for trending.”
Gray v. Linn County Assessor (2018) ortc “ORS 308.233(2). Trending and indexing are developed from annual “ratio studies” prepared by the county assessors.”
Miller v. Benton County Assessor (2012) ortc · cites it 3× “ORS 308.233 discusses the use of “sales data” “[f]or purposes of making a physical appraisal of property for ad valorem property taxation[.”
Phillips v. Lane County Assessor (2012) ortc “232; ORS 308.233; ORS 308.235, etc.). Defendant relies on Redmond as support for applying ORS 308A.”
Clackamas County Assessor v. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLC (2010) or · cites it 2× “See ORS 308.233 and ORS 309.203. This process is called “trending.”
Rothenfluch v. Department of Revenue (1991) or “ORS 308.233 describes how “a physical appraisal of property for ad valorem property taxation” is to be made and states the purpose “to achieve equality and uniformity in assessed values between properties that are physically appraised and those that are not physically appraised,…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 308.233(2) — 4 cases
Clackamas County Assessor v. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLC (2010) or “See ORS 308.233 and ORS 309.203. This process is called “trending.”
AKS LLC v. Dept. of Rev. (2019) ortc “ORS 308.233(2). Additional laws provide direction for the development of data used for trending.”
Miller v. Benton County Assessor (2012) ortc “ORS 308.233 discusses the use of “sales data” “[f]or purposes of making a physical appraisal of property for ad valorem property taxation[.”
Gray v. Linn County Assessor (2018) ortc “ORS 308.233(2). Trending and indexing are developed from annual “ratio studies” prepared by the county assessors.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.