314.660
Determination of payroll factor.
(1) For purposes of ORS 317.391, the payroll factor is a fraction, the
numerator of which is the total amount paid in this state during the tax period
by the taxpayer for compensation, and the denominator of which is the total
compensation paid everywhere during the tax period.
(2) Compensation
is paid in this state if:
(a) The
individual’s service is performed entirely within the state;
(b) The
individual’s service is performed both within and without the state, but the
service performed without the state is incidental to the individual’s service
within the state; or
(c) Some of the
service is performed in the state and (A) the base of operations or, if there
is no base of operations, the place from which the service is directed or
controlled is in the state, or (B) the base of operations or the place from
which the service is directed or controlled is not in any state in which some
part of the service is performed, but the individual’s residence is in this
state. [1965 c.152 §§14,15; 2001 c.793 §4; 2001 c.933 §3; 2009 c.842 §3]
Notes of Decisions
Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Department of Revenue (1985)
or
“” *223 ORS 314.660 “(1) The payroll factor is a fraction, the numerator of which is the total amount paid in this state during the tax period by the taxpayer for compensation, and the denominator of which is the total compensation paid everywhere during the tax period.”
May Trucking Co. v. Employment Department (2016)
orctapp · cites it 2×
“660(2)(4), which implements ORS 314.660 relating to the determination of the payroll factor in the apportionment of business income paid in Oregon, states almost the identical test: “The term ‘base of operations’ is the place of more or less permanent nature from which the…”
Terrace Tower U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of Revenue (1999)
ortc
“655, ORS 314.660, and ORS 314.665. The factors, payroll, property, and sales, from which the apportionment formula is derived, are linked to a taxpayer’s activity within the state during its fiscal year.”
ABC Inc. v. Dept. of Rev. (2024)
ortc
“655 to ORS 314.660; Or Laws 2005, ch 832, §§ 48-49 (making sales the sole factor for apportionment).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 314.660(1) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.