Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 316.048

Taxable income of resident

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      316.048 Taxable income of resident. The entire taxable income of a resident of this state is the federal taxable income of the resident as defined in the laws of the United States, with the modifications, additions and subtractions provided in this chapter and other laws of this state applicable to personal income taxation. [Formerly 316.062; 1999 c.580 §4]

 

      316.049 [1977 c.755 §2; renumbered 316.777]

 

      316.050 [1977 c.553 §2; renumbered 316.783]

 

      316.051 [1977 c.390 §2; renumbered 316.788]

 

      316.052 [1977 c.390 §3; 1979 c.691 §2; renumbered 316.794]

 

      316.053 [1977 c.390 §4; renumbered 316.799]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 72 cases (20 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: Denniston v. Department of Revenue
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Denniston v. Department of Revenue (1979) or · cites it 5× “6 ORS 316.048 provides: "The entire taxable income of a resident of this state is his federal taxable income as defined in the laws of the United States, with the modifications, additions and subtractions provided in this chapter.”
Hillenga v. Department of Revenue (2015) or · cites it 2× “See ORS 316.048 (generally, taxable income is as defined by federal law); 6 ORS 316.”
Hillenga v. Dept. of Rev. (2014) ortc “ORS 316.048 incorporates the provisions of the federal Internal Revenue Code for purposes of determining Oregon Income Tax liability, except where the Legislative Assembly has adopted specific exceptions.”
Harding v. Department of Revenue (1996) ortc “ORS 316.048. 2 Accordingly, Oregon looks to federal law.”
Allison v. Department of Revenue (1990) ortc · cites it 2× “4 Defendant contends these sections are not administrative provisions but part of the definition of federal taxable income adopted by ORS 316.048. The court finds that IRC § 482 and IRC § 446(b) are not adopted by reference.”
Roelli v. Department of Revenue (1986) ortc “IRC § 220(A); ORS 316.048.” (Defendant’s Exhibits C and D.”
Jimenez v. Dept. of Rev. (2021) ortc “022(6); ORS 316.048. Plaintiffs make four main arguments.”
Dept. of Rev. v. Washington Federal, Inc. (2012) ortc “022(6); ORS 316.048. The federal change can be said to result in a change in Oregon tax liability in all cases except where the department makes a different factual or legal determination.”
Zemke v. Department of Revenue (2003) ortc · cites it 2× “007; ORS 316.048; see also IRC § 61, Treas Reg 1-61.”
Jimenez v. Dept. of Rev. (2022) or “In its summary-judgment ruling, the Tax Court addressed each of taxpayers’ four main arguments and explained why, in the court’s view, each was incorrect.”
Matter of Marriage of Engle (1981) orctapp “…since an Oregon resident’s taxable income for purposes of state taxation is equal to his federal taxable income. ORS 316.048.”
Wood v. Department of Revenue (1988) or “” ORS 316.048. 5 In Supreme Ct. of New Hampshire v.”
Show all 72 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.