Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 317.267

Dividends received by corporation from certain other corporations

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      317.267 Dividends received by corporation from certain other corporations. (1) To derive Oregon taxable income, there shall be added to federal taxable income:

      (a) Amounts received as dividends from corporations deducted for federal purposes pursuant to section 243 or 245 of the Internal Revenue Code, except section 245(c) of the Internal Revenue Code;

      (b) Amounts deducted for income repatriated, deemed or otherwise, under section 965 of the Internal Revenue Code;

      (c) Amounts deducted as global intangible low-taxed income pursuant to section 250 of the Internal Revenue Code;

      (d) Amounts paid as dividends by a public utility or telecommunications utility and deducted for federal purposes pursuant to section 247 of the Internal Revenue Code; or

      (e) Dividends eliminated under Treasury Regulations adopted under section 1502 of the Internal Revenue Code that are paid by members of an affiliated group that are eliminated from a consolidated federal return pursuant to ORS 317.715 (2).

      (2) To derive Oregon taxable income, after the modification prescribed under subsection (1) of this section, there shall be subtracted from federal taxable income an amount equal to 70 percent of dividends (determined without regard to section 78 of the Internal Revenue Code) received or deemed received from corporations if such dividends are included in federal taxable income. However:

      (a) In the case of any dividend on debt-financed portfolio stock as described in section 246A of the Internal Revenue Code, the subtraction allowed under this subsection shall be reduced under the same conditions and in same amount as the dividends received deduction otherwise allowable for federal income tax purposes is reduced under section 246A of the Internal Revenue Code.

      (b) In the case of any dividend received from a 20 percent owned corporation, as defined in section 243(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, or global intangible low-taxed income included in gross income pursuant to section 951A of the Internal Revenue Code, this subsection shall be applied by substituting “80 percent” for “70 percent.”

      (c) A dividend that is not treated as a dividend under section 243(d) of the Internal Revenue Code may not be treated as a dividend for purposes of this subsection.

      (d) If a dividends received deduction is not allowed for federal tax purposes because of section 246(a) or (c) of the Internal Revenue Code, a subtraction may not be made under this subsection for received dividends that are described in section 246(a) or (c) of the Internal Revenue Code.

      (e) In the case of any dividend received from an alien, domestic or foreign insurer, as defined in ORS 731.082, that would be included in the taxpayer’s consolidated Oregon return but for the application of ORS 317.710 (5) or (7), this subsection shall be applied by substituting “100 percent” for “70 percent.”

      (f) A subtraction under this subsection is not allowed for any amount of foreign-source dividend income, as described in section 245A of the Internal Revenue Code, that is included in gross income.

      (3) There shall be excluded from the sales factor of any apportionment formula employed to attribute income to this state any amount subtracted from federal taxable income under subsection (2) of this section or deducted under section 245A of the Internal Revenue Code. The amount of any dividend or of any global intangible low-taxed income that is apportionable shall be determined as provided by the apportionment formula applicable to the taxpayer, as provided in ORS 314.280 and 314.605 to 314.675, but may not include any amount subtracted under subsection (2) of this section. [1983 c.162 §13; 1984 c.1 §9; 1985 c.802 §33; 1987 c.293 §38; 1987 c.447 §119; 1987 c.911 §8i; 1989 c.625 §21; 2003 c.77 §21; 2005 c.80 §2; 2005 c.832 §33; 2013 c.707 §3; 2015 c.755 §5; 2017 c.316 §1; 2018 c.101 §28; 2019 c.556 §5]

 

      317.270 [Amended by 1957 c.88 §1; repealed by 1983 c.162 §57]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2012–2025 · leading case: Oracle Corp. and Subsidiaries II v. Dept. of Rev.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Oracle Corp. and Subsidiaries II v. Dept. of Rev. (2021) ortc · cites it 21× “Taxpayer treated the dividends and subpart F income from the CFCs as “dividends * * * received or deemed received” for purposes of the subtraction from the tax base that is allowed by ORS 317.267, commonly referred to as Oregon’s “dividends-received deduction” statute.”
Stancorp Financial Group, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev. (2013) ortc · cites it 13× “In fact, ORS 317.267, as quoted above, speaks directly to the treatment of certain dividends paid by one member of a federal affiliated group to another member of that group.”
Oracle Corp. and Subsidiaries I v. Dept. of Rev. (2020) ortc · cites it 26× “Taxpayer treated the Subpart F Income and the Dividends as “dividends * * * received or deemed received” for purposes of the subtraction allowed by ORS 317.267, commonly referred to as Oregon’s “dividends-received deduc- tion” statute.”
Dept. of Rev. v. Wakefield (2022) ortc “Instead, a number of discrete modifications applicable to cor- porations are codified at ORS 317.267 to 317.491. 6 Dept. of Rev. v.”
Microsoft Corp. v. Dept. of Rev. (2024) ortc · cites it 11× “Text, context and legislative history of ORS 317.267 In an effort to consider all relevant laws involved in the application of allocation and apportionment provisions, the court extends its analysis to the 1984 act that created Oregon’s water’s-edge system.”
Microsoft Corporation v. Dept. of Rev. (2025) ortc · cites it 11× “Text, context and legislative history of ORS 317.267 In an effort to consider all relevant laws involved in the application of allocation and apportionment provisions, the court extends its analysis to the 1984 act that created Oregon’s water’s-edge system.”
Microsoft Corporation v. Dept. of Rev. (2025) ortc · cites it 11× “Text, context and legislative history of ORS 317.267 In an effort to consider all relevant laws involved in the application of allocation and apportionment provisions, the court extends its analysis to the 1984 act that created Oregon’s water’s-edge system.”
Stancorp Financial Group and Subsidiaries v. Department of Revenue (2012) ortc · cites it 12× “In fact, ORS 317.267, as quoted above, speaks directly to the treatment of certain dividends paid by one member of a federal affiliated group to another member of that group.”
Oracle Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Dept. of Rev. (2021) ortc “The Department’s motion asked the court to determine that ORS 314.”
M&T Bank Corp. v. Dept of Rev. (2015) ortc “295; and (3) REIT distributions are dividends under IRC section 316, and MRET distributions qualified for the deduction under ORS 317.267(2) for the 2004 and 2005 tax years.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 317.267(1) — 2 cases
Stancorp Financial Group, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev. (2013) ortc “In fact, ORS 317.267, as quoted above, speaks directly to the treatment of certain dividends paid by one member of a federal affiliated group to another member of that group.”
Stancorp Financial Group and Subsidiaries v. Department of Revenue (2012) ortc “In fact, ORS 317.267, as quoted above, speaks directly to the treatment of certain dividends paid by one member of a federal affiliated group to another member of that group.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 317.267(2) — 8 cases
Oracle Corp. and Subsidiaries II v. Dept. of Rev. (2021) ortc “Taxpayer treated the dividends and subpart F income from the CFCs as “dividends * * * received or deemed received” for purposes of the subtraction from the tax base that is allowed by ORS 317.267, commonly referred to as Oregon’s “dividends-received deduction” statute.”
Stancorp Financial Group, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev. (2013) ortc “In fact, ORS 317.267, as quoted above, speaks directly to the treatment of certain dividends paid by one member of a federal affiliated group to another member of that group.”
Oracle Corp. and Subsidiaries I v. Dept. of Rev. (2020) ortc “Taxpayer treated the Subpart F Income and the Dividends as “dividends * * * received or deemed received” for purposes of the subtraction allowed by ORS 317.267, commonly referred to as Oregon’s “dividends-received deduc- tion” statute.”
Microsoft Corp. v. Dept. of Rev. (2024) ortc “Text, context and legislative history of ORS 317.267 In an effort to consider all relevant laws involved in the application of allocation and apportionment provisions, the court extends its analysis to the 1984 act that created Oregon’s water’s-edge system.”
Microsoft Corporation v. Dept. of Rev. (2025) ortc “Text, context and legislative history of ORS 317.267 In an effort to consider all relevant laws involved in the application of allocation and apportionment provisions, the court extends its analysis to the 1984 act that created Oregon’s water’s-edge system.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 317.267(2)(b) — 6 cases
Stancorp Financial Group, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev. (2013) ortc “In fact, ORS 317.267, as quoted above, speaks directly to the treatment of certain dividends paid by one member of a federal affiliated group to another member of that group.”
Oracle Corp. and Subsidiaries I v. Dept. of Rev. (2020) ortc “Taxpayer treated the Subpart F Income and the Dividends as “dividends * * * received or deemed received” for purposes of the subtraction allowed by ORS 317.267, commonly referred to as Oregon’s “dividends-received deduc- tion” statute.”
Microsoft Corp. v. Dept. of Rev. (2024) ortc “Text, context and legislative history of ORS 317.267 In an effort to consider all relevant laws involved in the application of allocation and apportionment provisions, the court extends its analysis to the 1984 act that created Oregon’s water’s-edge system.”
Microsoft Corporation v. Dept. of Rev. (2025) ortc “Text, context and legislative history of ORS 317.267 In an effort to consider all relevant laws involved in the application of allocation and apportionment provisions, the court extends its analysis to the 1984 act that created Oregon’s water’s-edge system.”
Microsoft Corporation v. Dept. of Rev. (2025) ortc “Text, context and legislative history of ORS 317.267 In an effort to consider all relevant laws involved in the application of allocation and apportionment provisions, the court extends its analysis to the 1984 act that created Oregon’s water’s-edge system.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 317.267(3) — 6 cases
Oracle Corp. and Subsidiaries II v. Dept. of Rev. (2021) ortc “Taxpayer treated the dividends and subpart F income from the CFCs as “dividends * * * received or deemed received” for purposes of the subtraction from the tax base that is allowed by ORS 317.267, commonly referred to as Oregon’s “dividends-received deduction” statute.”
Oracle Corp. and Subsidiaries I v. Dept. of Rev. (2020) ortc “Taxpayer treated the Subpart F Income and the Dividends as “dividends * * * received or deemed received” for purposes of the subtraction allowed by ORS 317.267, commonly referred to as Oregon’s “dividends-received deduc- tion” statute.”
Oracle Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Dept. of Rev. (2021) ortc “The Department’s motion asked the court to determine that ORS 314.”
Microsoft Corp. v. Dept. of Rev. (2024) ortc “Text, context and legislative history of ORS 317.267 In an effort to consider all relevant laws involved in the application of allocation and apportionment provisions, the court extends its analysis to the 1984 act that created Oregon’s water’s-edge system.”
Microsoft Corporation v. Dept. of Rev. (2025) ortc “Text, context and legislative history of ORS 317.267 In an effort to consider all relevant laws involved in the application of allocation and apportionment provisions, the court extends its analysis to the 1984 act that created Oregon’s water’s-edge system.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.