Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875 (2026)

Parties to proceedings; rights of limited participation; status of grandparents; interpreters

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      419B.875 Parties to proceedings; rights of limited participation; status of grandparents; interpreters. (1)(a) Parties to proceedings in the juvenile court under ORS 419B.100 and 419B.500 are:

      (A) The child or ward;

      (B) The parents or guardian of the child or ward;

      (C) An alleged genetic parent of the child or ward who has demonstrated a direct and significant commitment to the child or ward by assuming, or attempting to assume, responsibilities normally associated with parenthood, including but not limited to:

      (i) Residing with the child or ward;

      (ii) Contributing to the financial support of the child or ward; or

      (iii) Establishing psychological ties with the child or ward;

      (D) The state;

      (E) The juvenile department;

      (F) A court appointed special advocate, if appointed;

      (G) The Department of Human Services if:

      (i) The department is the petitioner;

      (ii) The department has taken the child or ward into protective custody;

      (iii) The court has granted the department temporary custody of the child under ORS 419B.809 (5); or

      (iv) The ward has been committed to the legal custody of the department for care, placement and supervision under ORS 419B.337;

      (H) A child-caring agency if the agency has temporary custody of the child or ward; and

      (I) If the child or ward is an Indian child:

      (i) The Indian child’s tribe; and

      (ii) The Indian child’s Indian custodian.

      (b) An intervenor who is granted intervention under ORS 419B.116 is a party to a proceeding under ORS 419B.100. An intervenor under this paragraph is not a party to a proceeding under ORS 419B.500.

      (c) If an Indian child is a member of or is eligible for membership in more than one tribe, the court may, in its discretion, permit a tribe, in addition to the Indian child’s tribe, to participate in a proceeding under this chapter involving the Indian child in an advisory capacity or as a party.

      (2) The rights of the parties include, but are not limited to:

      (a) The right to notice of the proceeding and copies of the petitions, answers, motions and other papers;

      (b) The right to appear with counsel and, except for intervenors under subsection (1)(b) of this section, to have counsel appointed as otherwise provided by law;

      (c) The right to call witnesses, cross-examine witnesses and participate in hearings;

      (d) The right of appeal; and

      (e) The right to request a hearing.

      (3) An alleged genetic parent who satisfies the criteria set out in subsection (1)(a)(C) of this section shall be treated as a parent, as that term is used in this chapter and ORS chapters 419A and 419C, until the court confirms the alleged genetic parent’s parentage or finds that the alleged genetic parent is not the legal or genetic parent of the child or ward.

      (4) If no appeal from the judgment or order is pending, an alleged genetic parent whom a court of competent jurisdiction has found not to be the child or ward’s legal or genetic parent or who has filed a petition for adjudication of parentage that was dismissed is not a party under subsection (1) of this section.

      (5)(a) A person granted rights of limited participation under ORS 419B.116 is not a party to a proceeding under ORS 419B.100 or 419B.500 but has only those rights specified in the order granting rights of limited participation.

      (b) Persons moving for or granted rights of limited participation are not entitled to appointed counsel but may appear with retained counsel.

      (6) If a foster parent, preadoptive parent or relative is currently providing care for a child or ward, the Department of Human Services shall give the foster parent, preadoptive parent or relative notice of a proceeding concerning the child or ward. A foster parent, preadoptive parent or relative providing care for a child or ward has the right to be heard at the proceeding. Except when allowed to intervene, the foster parent, preadoptive parent or relative providing care for the child or ward is not considered a party to the juvenile court proceeding solely because of notice and the right to be heard at the proceeding.

      (7)(a) The Department of Human Services shall make diligent efforts to identify and obtain contact information for the grandparents of a child or ward committed to the department’s custody. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, when the department knows the identity of and has contact information for a grandparent, the department shall give the grandparent notice of a hearing concerning the child or ward. Upon a showing of good cause, the court may relieve the department of its responsibility to provide notice under this paragraph.

      (b) If a grandparent of a child or ward is present at a hearing concerning the child or ward, and the court informs the grandparent of the date and time of a future hearing, the department is not required to give notice of the future hearing to the grandparent.

      (c) If a grandparent is present at a hearing concerning a child or ward, the court shall give the grandparent an opportunity to be heard.

      (d) The court’s orders or judgments entered in proceedings under ORS 419B.185, 419B.310, 419B.325, 419B.449, 419B.476 and 419B.500 must include findings of the court as to whether the grandparent had notice of the hearing, attended the hearing and had an opportunity to be heard.

      (e) Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, a grandparent is not a party to the juvenile court proceeding unless the grandparent has been granted rights of intervention under ORS 419B.116.

      (f) As used in this subsection, “grandparent” means the legal parent of the child’s or ward’s legal parent, regardless of whether the parental rights of the child’s or ward’s legal parent have been terminated under ORS 419B.500 to 419B.524.

      (8) Interpreters for parties and persons granted rights of limited participation shall be appointed in the manner specified by ORS 45.275 and 45.285. [Formerly 419B.115; 2003 c.231 §§1,2; 2003 c.396 §§93a,94a; 2005 c.160 §4; 2005 c.450 §8; 2007 c.454 §11; 2007 c.611 §9; 2013 c.436 §1; 2015 c.216 §1; 2017 c.651 §44; 2020 s.s.1 c.14 §28; 2021 c.398 §13; 2023 c.267 §8; 2025 c.262 §1; 2025 c.592 §145]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 51 cases (23 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Juv. Dep't v. Cooper, 72 P.3d 674 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dep't v. Cooper, 72 P.3d 674 (Or. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 13× “See ORS 419B.875; Evjen. That was reversible error.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. A. E. R., 374 P.3d 1018 (Wasco Cty. Cir. Ct., O.R. 2016). · cites it 7× “We review the meaning of the rights conferred by ORS 419B.875(2) as a matter of law, under the established rules of statutory construction.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. C. M. H., 486 P.3d 772 (Or. 2021). · cites it 3× “The Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply in these proceedings.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. S. P., 275 P.3d 979 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 3× “” ORS 419B.875(l)(a), in turn, specifies that “[t]he child or ward,” ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. W. C. T., 501 P.3d 44 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “803; that parents are to be made par- ties to the proceedings in juvenile court, ORS 419B.875 (1)(a)(B); and that parents, when served, are subject to the jurisdiction of the court, ORS 419B.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. D. J., 314 P.3d 998 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 6× “ORS 419B.875 expressly applies to jurisdictional hearings under ORS 419B.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. G. D. W., 292 P.3d 548 (Or. 2012). · cites it 2× “ORS 419B.875(l)(a)(A), (2). Although it is true that the child rarely, if ever, would enter anything equivalent to a pleading, the child can stake out a position on the issues before the court in the same way that any other party to the proceeding would — through opening…”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. T. L., 369 P.3d 1159 (Or. 2016). “) 11 The broad authority to test DHS’s evidence is shown by ORS 419B.875(2), which provides a nonexclusive list of rights granted to parties in dependency and termination hearings.”
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dep't v. Kopp, 43 P.3d 1197 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “115 was amended Bind renumbered as ORS 419B.875. Or Laws 2001, ch 622, §§ 39, 39a.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. E. M., 341 P.3d 216 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “Based on the circumstances presented, the juvenile court erred by denying father’s motion for continuance or otherwise failing to make other procedural accommodations to protect father’s right to participate, ORS 419B.875(2). ORS 419B.800(3). 2 Reversed and remanded.”
Keffer v. A. R. M., 497 P.3d 781 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “366,4 have requirements for their establish- ment that tie into the other parts of the juvenile dependency initiated by an intervenor under ORS 419B.875, the state is not foreclosed from filing a subsequent action should the intervenor’s petition be denied.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. T. J., 466 P.3d 702 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 7× “) Father argues that the court’s error here was prejudicial because it deprived father of his rights under ORS 419B.875 to participate and present a defense at the jurisdictional hearing, thus rendering the pro- ceedings fundamentally unfair.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(1) — 12 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. C. M. H., 486 P.3d 772 (Or. 2021). “The Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply in these proceedings.”
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dep't v. Cooper, 72 P.3d 674 (Or. Ct. App. 2003). “See ORS 419B.875; Evjen. That was reversible error.”
State Ex Rel. Dep't of Human Servs. v. S. P. B., 178 P.3d 307 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
Dep't of Human Servs. v. M. H., 300 P.3d 1262 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).
Keffer v. A. R. M., 497 P.3d 781 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “366,4 have requirements for their establish- ment that tie into the other parts of the juvenile dependency initiated by an intervenor under ORS 419B.875, the state is not foreclosed from filing a subsequent action should the intervenor’s petition be denied.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(1)(a) — 4 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. C. M. H., 486 P.3d 772 (Or. 2021). “The Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply in these proceedings.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. C. S. (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
Dept. of Human Servs. v. C. S. (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
Dept. of Human Servs. v. A. T. (Or. Ct. App. 2026).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(1)(a)(A) — 1 case
Dept. of Human Servs. v. J. L. S., 321 Or. App. 158 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(1)(a)(B) — 5 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. W. C. T., 501 P.3d 44 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “803; that parents are to be made par- ties to the proceedings in juvenile court, ORS 419B.875 (1)(a)(B); and that parents, when served, are subject to the jurisdiction of the court, ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. D. J. L., 345 Or. App. 474 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. TS, 164 P.3d 308 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. D. L. (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
Dept. of Human Servs. v. D. J. L., 345 Or. App. 474 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(1)(a)(C) — 2 cases
Dep't of Human Servs. v. J. B., 273 P.3d 196 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. B. (Or. Ct. App. 2026).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(1)(a)(D) — 1 case
Dept. of Human Servs. v. A. T. (Or. Ct. App. 2026).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(1)(a)(G) — 2 cases
Dep't of Human Servs. v. B. M. C., 355 P.3d 190 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. G. H., 305 Or. App. 783 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(1)(b) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dep't v. Cooper, 72 P.3d 674 (Or. Ct. App. 2003). “See ORS 419B.875; Evjen. That was reversible error.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(1)(f) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dep't v. Cooper, 72 P.3d 674 (Or. Ct. App. 2003). “See ORS 419B.875; Evjen. That was reversible error.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(2) — 18 cases
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dep't v. Cooper, 72 P.3d 674 (Or. Ct. App. 2003). “See ORS 419B.875; Evjen. That was reversible error.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. T. L., 369 P.3d 1159 (Or. 2016). “) 11 The broad authority to test DHS’s evidence is shown by ORS 419B.875(2), which provides a nonexclusive list of rights granted to parties in dependency and termination hearings.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. A. E. R., 374 P.3d 1018 (Wasco Cty. Cir. Ct., O.R. 2016). “We review the meaning of the rights conferred by ORS 419B.875(2) as a matter of law, under the established rules of statutory construction.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. D. J., 314 P.3d 998 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “ORS 419B.875 expressly applies to jurisdictional hearings under ORS 419B.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. E. M., 341 P.3d 216 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). “Based on the circumstances presented, the juvenile court erred by denying father’s motion for continuance or otherwise failing to make other procedural accommodations to protect father’s right to participate, ORS 419B.875(2). ORS 419B.800(3). 2 Reversed and remanded.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(2)(a) — 2 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. C. C., 343 Or. App. 657 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
Dept. of Human Servs. v. C. C., 343 Or. App. 657 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(2)(b) — 4 cases
Dep't of Human Servs. v. A. E. R., 374 P.3d 1018 (Wasco Cty. Cir. Ct., O.R. 2016). “We review the meaning of the rights conferred by ORS 419B.875(2) as a matter of law, under the established rules of statutory construction.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. D. J., 314 P.3d 998 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “ORS 419B.875 expressly applies to jurisdictional hearings under ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. D. L. (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
State ex rel. Juv. Dep't v. Jackson, 142 P.3d 110 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(2)(c) — 9 cases
Dep't of Human Servs. v. A. E. R., 374 P.3d 1018 (Wasco Cty. Cir. Ct., O.R. 2016). “We review the meaning of the rights conferred by ORS 419B.875(2) as a matter of law, under the established rules of statutory construction.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. E. M., 341 P.3d 216 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). “Based on the circumstances presented, the juvenile court erred by denying father’s motion for continuance or otherwise failing to make other procedural accommodations to protect father’s right to participate, ORS 419B.875(2). ORS 419B.800(3). 2 Reversed and remanded.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. D. J., 314 P.3d 998 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “ORS 419B.875 expressly applies to jurisdictional hearings under ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. T. J., 466 P.3d 702 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). “) Father argues that the court’s error here was prejudicial because it deprived father of his rights under ORS 419B.875 to participate and present a defense at the jurisdictional hearing, thus rendering the pro- ceedings fundamentally unfair.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. E. L. P., 336 Or. App. 751 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(3) — 1 case
Dep't of Human Servs. v. J. B., 273 P.3d 196 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(l)(a) — 2 cases
Dep't of Human Servs. v. S. P., 275 P.3d 979 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). “” ORS 419B.875(l)(a), in turn, specifies that “[t]he child or ward,” ORS 419B.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. A. S.-M., 350 P.3d 207 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(l)(a)(A) — 2 cases
Dep't of Human Servs. v. G. D. W., 292 P.3d 548 (Or. 2012). “ORS 419B.875(l)(a)(A), (2). Although it is true that the child rarely, if ever, would enter anything equivalent to a pleading, the child can stake out a position on the issues before the court in the same way that any other party to the proceeding would — through opening…”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. S. P., 275 P.3d 979 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). “” ORS 419B.875(l)(a), in turn, specifies that “[t]he child or ward,” ORS 419B.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(l)(a)(B) — 3 cases
Dep't of Human Servs. v. S. P., 275 P.3d 979 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). “” ORS 419B.875(l)(a), in turn, specifies that “[t]he child or ward,” ORS 419B.”
State ex rel. Juv. Dep't v. T. S., 164 P.3d 308 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
State ex rel. Juv. Dep't v. Jackson, 142 P.3d 110 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.875(l)(a)(C) — 1 case
Dep't of Human Servs. v. J. B., 273 P.3d 196 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.