Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 419C.617 (2026)

Time limitation for certain adults seeking relief under ORS 419C.615

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      419C.617 Time limitation for certain adults seeking relief under ORS 419C.615. If a person seeking relief under ORS 419C.615 is over 18 years of age and is no longer within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, the petition must be filed within two years of the following, unless the court on hearing a subsequent petition finds grounds for relief asserted therein that could not reasonably have been raised in the original petition or an amended petition:

      (1) If no appeal is taken, the date the juvenile court adjudication was entered in the register.

      (2) If an appeal is taken, the date the appeal is final in the Oregon appellate courts. [2001 c.803 §5]

 

REPORTS BY AGENCY HAVING GUARDIANSHIP OR LEGAL CUSTODY

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2016–2017 · leading case: Dep't of Human Servs. v. T. L., 369 P.3d 1159 (Or. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dep't of Human Servs. v. T. L., 369 P.3d 1159 (Or. 2016). · cites it 3× “616 sets out detailed exhaustion-type provisions concerning the relationship between a proceeding to set aside a delinquency judgment and other proceedings, including a direct appeal from the judgment, and ORS 419C.617 establishes time limits for asserting claims to set *698…”
State v. E. C.-P. (In re E. C.-P.), 410 P.3d 1045 (Or. Ct. App. 2017). “We also note that, in ORS 419C.617, the legislature established a two-year limitations period for a person seeking post-adjudication relief on the grounds in ORS 419C.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. T. L. (Or. 2016). · cites it 3× “616 sets out detailed exhaustion-type provisions concerning the relationship between a proceed- ing to set aside a delinquency judgment and other proceed- ings, including a direct appeal from the judgment, and ORS 419C.617 establishes time limits for asserting claims to set 698…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.