Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 419C.680 (2026)

Curfew; parental responsibility; authority of political subdivisions; custody authorized

✓ current as of May 2026 Cite as: Or. Rev. Stat. § 419C.680 (2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      419C.680 Curfew; parental responsibility; authority of political subdivisions; custody authorized. (1) No minor shall be in or upon any street, highway, park, alley or other public place between the hours of 12 midnight and 4 a.m. of the following morning, unless:

      (a) Such minor is accompanied by a parent, guardian or other person 18 years of age or over and authorized by the parent or by law to have care and custody of the minor;

      (b) Such minor is then engaged in a lawful pursuit or activity which requires the presence of the minor in such public places during the hours specified in this section; or

      (c) The minor is emancipated pursuant to ORS 419B.550 to 419B.558.

      (2) No parent, guardian or person having the care and custody of a minor under the age of 18 years shall allow such minor to be in or upon any street, highway, park, alley or other public place between the hours specified in subsection (1) of this section, except as otherwise provided in that subsection.

      (3) Subsections (1) and (2) of this section do not affect the authority of any political subdivision to make regulations concerning the conduct of minors in public places by ordinance or other local law, provided, that the local ordinance or law restricts curfew hours at least to the extent required by subsections (1) and (2) of this section.

      (4) The county court or board of county commissioners of any county may provide by ordinance for a curfew restriction on minors applicable to areas not within a city, which has the same terms provided in subsection (1) of this section except that the period of curfew may include hours in addition to those specified in subsection (1) of this section. The ordinance may provide different periods of curfew for different age groups.

      (5) Any minor who violates subsection (1) of this section or an ordinance established under subsection (4) of this section may be taken into custody as provided in ORS 419C.080, 419C.085 and 419C.088 and may be subjected to further proceedings as provided in this chapter. [1993 c.33 §271; 1993 c.546 §140; 1995 c.593 §2; 1997 c.727 §9]

_______________

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2024 · leading case: State v. J. G. G.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. J. G. G. (2016) orccmarion · cites it 4× “On appeal, youth argues that the court erred as a matter of law either by not interpreting “curfew” within the context of the juvenile code, including using the definition found in ORS 419C.680, 1 or by subjecting youth to an unconstitutionally vague order.”
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. J. D. (2007) orctapp “760 was reenacted as ORS 419C.680. Or Laws 1993, ch 33, § 271.”
State v. Olinger (2024) orctapp “He, he also inquired because he was trying to determine if the passenger was committing a curfew viola- tion pursuant to [ORS 419C.680]. And she was. * * * And I find that [the trooper’s] suspicions were reasonable based on all of those things.”
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. JD (2007) orctapp “760 was reenacted as ORS 419C.680. Or. Laws 1993, ch. 33, § 271.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.