646.930 Motor
vehicle fuel prices; requirements for display. (1) A person who operates a
service station, business or other place for the purpose of retailing and
delivering gasoline, diesel or other fuel into the tanks of motor vehicles:
(a) May display
on a sign visible from the street the lowest cash prices charged for the sale
of the lowest grades of gasoline, diesel or other fuel.
(b) If a sign is
displayed under paragraph (a) of this subsection, shall display on a sign
visible at or near any dispensing device all prices charged for the sale of all
grades of gasoline, diesel or other fuel offered for sale.
(2) The following
apply to a sign displaying prices under this section:
(a) The price per
unit of measurement and the unit of measurement for a particular kind of fuel
must be the same on the sign as on any dispensing device used for delivering
that kind of fuel into the tanks of motor vehicles.
(b) If a cash
price displayed on a sign is available only under some conditions, the sign and
the dispensing device must clearly state the conditions.
(c) If a price
displayed on a sign is available only in a certain area of the service station
or business, the area where the price displayed is available must be clearly
identified.
(3) A person who
displays a cash price that is available only under some conditions may not
require, as a condition of buying fuel at the displayed price, that the buyer
fill the fuel tank of the buyer’s vehicle. [Formerly 646.875; 2010 c.19 §1]
Notes of Decisions
Scharfstein v. BP W. Coast Prods., LLC, 423 P.3d 757 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 9× “Additionally, we decline to address BP's challenge to plaintiff's alternative theory of liability under OAR 137-020-0150(4)(e) because, even if it was error to submit that theory of liability to the jury, it would be harmless because the jury separately found BP in violation of…”
BP West Coast Prods., LLP v. Oregon Dep't of Just., 396 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 57× “” We disagree; ORS 646.930 establishes the minimum requirements for a service station’s posting of fuel prices, and it does not prohibit the Attorney General from adopting rules under ORS 646.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.930(1) — 1 case
BP West Coast Prods., LLP v. Oregon Dep't of Just., 396 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).
“” We disagree; ORS 646.930 establishes the minimum requirements for a service station’s posting of fuel prices, and it does not prohibit the Attorney General from adopting rules under ORS 646.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.930(1)(a) — 2 cases
Scharfstein v. BP W. Coast Prods., LLC, 423 P.3d 757 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
“Additionally, we decline to address BP's challenge to plaintiff's alternative theory of liability under OAR 137-020-0150(4)(e) because, even if it was error to submit that theory of liability to the jury, it would be harmless because the jury separately found BP in violation of…”
BP West Coast Prods., LLP v. Oregon Dep't of Just., 396 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).
“” We disagree; ORS 646.930 establishes the minimum requirements for a service station’s posting of fuel prices, and it does not prohibit the Attorney General from adopting rules under ORS 646.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.930(1)(b) — 1 case
BP West Coast Prods., LLP v. Oregon Dep't of Just., 396 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).
“” We disagree; ORS 646.930 establishes the minimum requirements for a service station’s posting of fuel prices, and it does not prohibit the Attorney General from adopting rules under ORS 646.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.930(2) — 1 case
BP West Coast Prods., LLP v. Oregon Dep't of Just., 396 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).
“” We disagree; ORS 646.930 establishes the minimum requirements for a service station’s posting of fuel prices, and it does not prohibit the Attorney General from adopting rules under ORS 646.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.930(2)(b) — 2 cases
Scharfstein v. BP W. Coast Prods., LLC, 423 P.3d 757 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
“Additionally, we decline to address BP's challenge to plaintiff's alternative theory of liability under OAR 137-020-0150(4)(e) because, even if it was error to submit that theory of liability to the jury, it would be harmless because the jury separately found BP in violation of…”
BP West Coast Prods., LLP v. Oregon Dep't of Just., 396 P.3d 244 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).
“” We disagree; ORS 646.930 establishes the minimum requirements for a service station’s posting of fuel prices, and it does not prohibit the Attorney General from adopting rules under ORS 646.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.