Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 663.195 (2026)

Orders and findings of board

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      663.195 Orders and findings of board. (1) If, on the preponderance of the evidence taken and in the record, the Employment Relations Board is not of the opinion that the person named in the complaint has engaged in or is engaging in an unfair labor practice, the board shall state its findings of fact and shall issue an order dismissing the complaint.

      (2) If, on the preponderance of evidence taken and in the record, the board is of the opinion that a person named in the complaint has engaged in or is engaging in an unfair labor practice, the board shall state its findings of fact and shall issue and cause to be served on that person an order requiring the person to cease and desist from the unfair labor practice and to take such affirmative action, including reinstatement of employees with or without back pay, as will effectuate the policies of this chapter.

      (3) No order of the board shall require the reinstatement as an employee of an individual who has been suspended or discharged, or the payment to the individual of any back pay, if the individual was suspended or discharged for cause. [1971 c.729 §23]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1980–1980 · leading case: Vaughn v. Pac. Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 611 P.2d 281 (Or. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vaughn v. Pac. Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 611 P.2d 281 (Or. 1980). · cites it 3× “The standards in ORS 663.195 for holding an employer responsible for an unfair labor practice are applicable by analogy to the suit for injunctive relief in ORS 659.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 663.195(1) — 1 case
Vaughn v. Pac. Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 611 P.2d 281 (Or. 1980). “The standards in ORS 663.195 for holding an employer responsible for an unfair labor practice are applicable by analogy to the suit for injunctive relief in ORS 659.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 663.195(3) — 1 case
Vaughn v. Pac. Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 611 P.2d 281 (Or. 1980). “The standards in ORS 663.195 for holding an employer responsible for an unfair labor practice are applicable by analogy to the suit for injunctive relief in ORS 659.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.