Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 663.220

Appeal of board’s order to Court of Appeals; authority of court in reviewing order

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      663.220 Appeal of board’s order to Court of Appeals; authority of court in reviewing order. (1) Any person aggrieved by a final order of the Employment Relations Board granting or denying in whole or in part the relief sought may obtain a review of the order in the Court of Appeals by filing in the court a written petition praying that the order of the board be modified or set aside. A copy of the petition shall be transmitted forthwith by the clerk of the court to the board and thereupon the aggrieved party shall file in the court the record in the proceeding, certified by the board.

      (2) On the filing of the petition, the court shall proceed in the same manner as in the case of an application by the board under ORS 663.210, and it has the same jurisdiction to grant to the board temporary relief or restraining order as it considers just and proper, and in like manner to make and enter a judgment enforcing, modifying and enforcing as so modified, or setting aside in whole or in part the order of the board. The findings of the board with respect to questions of fact, if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, are in like manner conclusive. [1971 c.729 §28; 2003 c.576 §538]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1996–2022 · leading case: Central Catholic Education Ass'n v. Archdiocese of Portland
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Central Catholic Education Ass'n v. Archdiocese of Portland (1996) or · cites it 25× “We hold that judicial review was available in the Court of Appeals in this matter under ORS 663.220 and that ERB properly dismissed the union’s amended petition for lack of jurisdiction.”
Serv. Emps. Int'l Union Local 503 v. Univ. of Or. (2018) orctapp · cites it 2× “*111 Pursuant to ORS 663.220, 1 the University of Oregon petitions for review of an order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB) in this unfair labor practice case.”
Portland Fire Fighters' Assn. v. City of Portland (2022) orctapp “Oregon Institute of Technology, 314 Or App 595, 597 , 500 P3d 55 (2021), rev den, 369 Or 504 (2022); see also ORS 663.220(2) (“The findings of the board with respect to questions of fact, if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, are in like…”
Multnomah Cty. v. Mult. Cty. Corrections Deputy Assn. (2022) orctapp · cites it 2× “480, any party to an agency proceeding is entitled to judicial review of the final order,” but that “[u]nder ORS 663.220, however, only a ‘person aggrieved by a final order of [the board] * * * may obtain review of the order in the Court of Appeals’ ” and that “the county failed…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 663.220(1) — 2 cases
Central Catholic Education Ass'n v. Archdiocese of Portland (1996) or “We hold that judicial review was available in the Court of Appeals in this matter under ORS 663.220 and that ERB properly dismissed the union’s amended petition for lack of jurisdiction.”
Serv. Emps. Int'l Union Local 503 v. Univ. of Or. (2018) orctapp “*111 Pursuant to ORS 663.220, 1 the University of Oregon petitions for review of an order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB) in this unfair labor practice case.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 663.220(2) — 1 case
Portland Fire Fighters' Assn. v. City of Portland (2022) orctapp “Oregon Institute of Technology, 314 Or App 595, 597 , 500 P3d 55 (2021), rev den, 369 Or 504 (2022); see also ORS 663.220(2) (“The findings of the board with respect to questions of fact, if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, are in like…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.