Or. Rev. Stat. § 759.015
Legislative findings on universal telecommunications service
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
759.015 Legislative findings on universal telecommunications service. The Legislative Assembly finds and declares that it is the goal of the State of Oregon to secure and maintain high-quality universal telecommunications service at just and reasonable rates for all classes of customers and to encourage innovation within the industry by a balanced program of regulation and competition. The Public Utility Commission shall administer the statutes with respect to telecommunications rates and services in accordance with this policy. [Formerly 757.810]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2023 · leading case: Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Main Street Development, Inc.
Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Main Street Development, Inc. (2010)
“” See Or.Rev.Stat. § 759.015. Moreover, Verizon had to incur the cost of installing its facilities in the first place.”
GTE Northwest Inc. v. Public Utility Commission (1995)
“8 PUC cites ORS 759.015 in support of that proposition.”
Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Katz (1993)
“” ORS 759.015. (Emphasis supplied.) *53 Other statutes give PUC both authority and various mechanisms to ensure that consumers are charged “reasonable and just” rates.”
At & T COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. Eachus (2001)
“ORS § 759.015. On June 16, 2000, the Commission issued its Order 00-312, as part of a series of orders, concerning the concept known as “universal service.”
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev. (2023)
“040(1) (2009); ORS 759.015 (2009) (“just and reasonable”).”
Beaver Creek Cooperative Telephone Co. v. Public Utility Commission (1999)
“Before addressing the merits of petitioners’ arguments, we observe that the legislative policy underlying telecommunications regulation is to “secure and maintain high-quality universal telecommunications service at just and reasonable rates for all classes of customers * * ORS…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.